Going by your posts, there's no doubt that will go out the window.
I'm ranked 5,721
He is the only poster that is on my ignore list now and going by his posts that get quoted its a good idea. Worst poster ever.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Going by your posts, there's no doubt that will go out the window.
I'm ranked 5,721
Yes. Made a mistake going with Selwood and Ebert in the first place, so may aswell try fix them ASAP.
Yes. Made a mistake going with Selwood and Ebert in the first place, so may aswell try fix them ASAP.
whats every1 ranked so far i've started well with a ranking of 156, but thats going to go out the window i think
Ebert was a mistake, but I had Selwood last year and he did pretty well.
Adam Selwood isnt a rookie, he is the Eagle tagger.
I would keep Selwood as he will have a decent year and go up in cash.
Ebert was a mistake, but I had Selwood last year and he did pretty well.
Selwood isnt exactly someone that will improve alot on his average from last year. He didnt have a strong average last year to start off with (averaged about 75??), cant see him upping that to around 85-90
Yeah, I'm not deadset on trading him out, but I want to upgrade Ebert and if I got rid of Selwood and got Palmer, I'd have more than enough money to replace him with a star.
It's just a matter of how often Palmer is going to play.
those injuries and that blod clot doesnt make him nemore injury proned nowyou don't judge keepers by average. You judge them by total score.
A player who missed most of last year with a broken ankle and surgury to remove a blood clot from his lung doesn't sound to me like 22 game material.
At most, I see you making some cash from him and trading him up.
you don't judge keepers by average. You judge them by total score.
A player who missed most of last year with a broken ankle and surgury to remove a blood clot from his lung doesn't sound to me like 22 game material.
At most, I see you making some cash from him and trading him up.
In that scenario, it's worth it if you believe player B is going to increase by another 20-30k the week following and so on. After a number of weeks, that trade would result in a gain much much more than 30 grand (any chance this is relating to Tippett and Hill?).I'm interested in the thoughts on how much a trade is worth financially.
For example is it worth using a trade to gain a 30k price increase?
If not when is it worth it?
Say for example I had player A who is guarenteed a start week in week out and costs the same as player B. However player A is expected to stay the same in value while player B is expected to increase 30, 40 or even 50 grand.
At what stage is the trade worth making?
I'm interested in the thoughts on how much a trade is worth financially.
For example is it worth using a trade to gain a 30k price increase?
If not when is it worth it?
Say for example I had player A who is guarenteed a start week in week out and costs the same as player B. However player A is expected to stay the same in value while player B is expected to increase 30, 40 or even 50 grand.
At what stage is the trade worth making?
In that scenario, it's worth it if you believe player B is going to increase by another 20-30k the week following and so on. After a number of weeks, that trade would result in a gain much much more than 30 grand (any chance this is relating to Tippett and Hill?).
Any thoughts on Hill or rioli to bring in. Getting rid of Hawkins and Maguire and looking to bring in Thornton and one of those two.
Sound more Like Hill and Gamble to me.In that scenario, it's worth it if you believe player B is going to increase by another 20-30k the week following and so on. After a number of weeks, that trade would result in a gain much much more than 30 grand (any chance this is relating to Tippett and Hill?).
In that scenario, it's worth it if you believe player B is going to increase by another 20-30k the week following and so on. After a number of weeks, that trade would result in a gain much much more than 30 grand (any chance this is relating to Tippett and Hill?).
More important then just money is how you want your team to look at the end of the season. I could trade N.Thompson for Hill and make around 100K+ in the long run, but then i'd have to trade another 'cash cow' to upgrade Hill later in the season to a gun. So i will have used 3 trades to get to that gun, when sticking with N.Thompson i might get away with only using 2 trades to get that gun specially if Thompson can do his part and get over 220-250K.
Look at your team and look at the players you need to upgrade. It will be around 7-10. That's anywhere between 14-20 trades to get them to guns, doesn't leave much room for injuries and that's what will hurt in the final 10 rounds of the season. In other words a trade doesn't have a value, you have to look at the bigger picture.
Either Hill or Rioli will be fine. But i'd consider sticking with Hawkins, it's only a matter of time before he goes bang. Up to you though, seems sideishways a bit though. You would have got Hawkins originally as a cash cow and he's playing games so he'll return a profit soon enough.
It takes a minimum 2 trades to upgrade to any premium, will just treat fev as a mid price upgradeable player, if he can string 2 or 3 decent games together then all the better.