Recruiting AFL Trade & Free Agency X - Club has elected not to fill list spot - Davey returning from injury?

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
How is it unfair?

We change the rules every year to bring a competent club back to the back.

If we wanted Bowes we could have offered him game time, but we didn't because our mids are so good.

Why is it so unbelievable that he didn’t just take the easy way out?

For all the talk of Cotton On money and crap like that there is the path of least resistance.
 
Why is it so unbelievable that he didn’t just take the easy way out?

For all the talk of Cotton On money and crap like that there is the path of least resistance.
Because it's not allowed to be the fact Geelong are the best run club in the league and us the worst.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

With these salary dumps for draft capital you should have to take the original contract on your books for the length of the deal. Geelong getting away Scott free by smoothing it out to 450-500 a year.
It's still a salary dump. So nothing the AFL can claim about it.
I think if the AFL are fair dinkum about equalisation they would tighten up on clubs paying unders. And to some extent backended contracts.
 
It's still a salary dump. So nothing the AFL can claim about it.
I think if the AFL are fair dinkum about equalisation they would tighten up on clubs paying unders. And to some extent backended contracts.
Yeh I know but the flip side of the draft pick should be the disadvantage of having 800k on your books x2 years for a player who isn’t worth that.
You can’t tell clubs to not back end contracts because it would stop so much player mobility around the league and would disable the ability for clubs to add to their list, it’s the same as club front ending contracts to top up to the cap floor. It’s rare a player gets their set money year after year. Money is constantly moved around to create space to the cap.
 
I totally agree. Just saying I think it's different to Stringer as Bulldogs would love Dunkley to stay, whereas they didn't want Stringer. I wouldn't be surprised if they raised that possibility with him to stay if they're at an impasse with Brisbane.

In the end I think he'll get traded, but it makes it interesting that Brisbane got rid of their first.

Brisbane are going to be a tough side next year with their ins this trade/draft period.
Well I was never saying the trades were similar though. Just that Dogs posters melting was a flash back.
 
Moving 22 in front of any GWS bids is now the main objective for mine (I know the talk is that a Davey bid comes in the 20s, but I'm not ready to dismiss McCartney's very real animosity as a decisive factor).
 
Exactly. It should only be available to teams that can afford it. Thus creating some level of equalisation and benefit to the bottom teams given free agency has worked out completely opposite to what they were planning.
Yeh I know but the flip side of the draft pick should be the disadvantage of having 800k on your books x2 years for a player who isn’t worth that.
You can’t tell clubs to not back end contracts because it would stop so much player mobility around the league and would disable the ability for clubs to add to their list, it’s the same as club front ending contracts to top up to the cap floor. It’s rare a player gets their set money year after year. Money is constantly moved around to create space to the cap.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Oh wow. He's highly rated then!
Yeah. He's a better technical ruck than Draper but not as aggressive. Most of us are hoping we can develop more forward craft between them so we can play them together.
 
Why is it so unbelievable that he didn’t just take the easy way out?

For all the talk of Cotton On money and crap like that there is the path of least resistance.


I'm not sure what you mean by the path of least resistance. It's not clear to me how that is basically taking a pay cut to play at a team at which you're not expecting to play.

According to SOS Geelong contacted Bowes' management during the year.

He's not going to Geelong because it's Geelong and they're well run. He's going to Geelong because they have convinced him of their interest in him.

Bowes could have already been told he'll get the first shot at replacing Selwood. Who is he competing with that his pedigree, age and experience would not have him in front of? Scott is very big on roles and team balance not reflecting the best 22 players on the list. Menegola, for example isn't a mid.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure what you mean by the path of least resistance. It's not clear to me how that is basically taking a pay cut to play at a team at which you're not expecting to play.

According to SOS Geelong contacted Bowes' management during the year.

He's not going to Geelong because it's Geelong and they're well run. He's going to Geelong because they have convinced him of their interest in him.
Fwiw they've told him there is a hole in their midfield he can fill.
 
Toby Greene, Nick Haynes and Lachy Whitfield are possibly on the market

if we aren't into at least Haynes i'm going to flip a lid!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top