Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The commentary via TV whether Ch7 or Foxtel is garbage, trying to commentate the game as if it's played in a tactical sense, it's laughable.
Chyloe is right up there as the worst alsoLaughable isn't the word I'd use to describe Underwood's commentary.
Cringeworthy is closer to the mark although that's underselling it.
Impressive. He knows AFLW started in 2017, and the name Mon Conti. That really helps disguise the nonsense in the rest of the post, which reads like AI-generated garbage.
View attachment 2127783
Watched a bit when it first started, then switched off.
Watched it again today. Its improved.
The woman's game will be very good in time. The girls are kicking the ball further, so its not a big scrum all over the ground all the time anymore. So when the skills get better, it will be very good to watch.
I'll tune back in in another couple of years to see where it's at.
Tbf it makes sense this week because its pride round so makes sense to highlight members of the LGBTI communityAm I the only one that tries to read the AFL / AFLW.com site to learn about AFLW football related stuff only to be met with "i'm a lesbian' stories as the main focus.
It's literally every other story gets 'my girlfriend' or 'my wife' shoehorned into the first or second paragraph.
I.Don't.Want.To.Know.Who.They.Are.Making.Love.To.
I don't want to know about the male players either.
Does anyone actually want to read this stuff, or would the AFLW be better served sticking to actual footy stories.
I thought 'Anne Hatchard becomes a lash tech to do her wifes eyelashes' was the pinnacle of "I don't care' stories - and Anne Hatchard of all people! - one of the best AFLW players of all time - surely there are better things to share.
But don't worry, good 'ol Maddy Scholz has it covered.
This was on todays webpage - peak "look at me,look at me - I make love to women!!"
View attachment 2138892
Maybe Scholz should start getting the Footy so kids can 'look up to her' for actually being a good football player - not for being gay.
I doubt if kids give a toss tbh.
Too many agendas in AFLW and it's keeping the sport from growing.
AFLW is more about sexuality than football glad I'm not the only one that sees it that way, who gives a flying saucer what a person's sexuality is.Am I the only one that tries to read the AFL / AFLW.com site to learn about AFLW football related stuff only to be met with "i'm a lesbian' stories as the main focus.
It's literally every other story gets 'my girlfriend' or 'my wife' shoehorned into the first or second paragraph.
I.Don't.Want.To.Know.Who.They.Are.Making.Love.To.
I don't want to know about the male players either.
Does anyone actually want to read this stuff, or would the AFLW be better served sticking to actual footy stories.
I thought 'Anne Hatchard becomes a lash tech to do her wifes eyelashes' was the pinnacle of "I don't care' stories - and Anne Hatchard of all people! - one of the best AFLW players of all time - surely there are better things to share.
But don't worry, good 'ol Maddy Scholz has it covered.
This was on todays webpage - peak "look at me,look at me - I make love to women!!"
View attachment 2138892
Maybe Scholz should start getting the Footy so kids can 'look up to her' for actually being a good football player - not for being gay.
I doubt if kids give a toss tbh.
Too many agendas in AFLW and it's keeping the sport from growing.
Your career advice for Matilda Scholz is as clueless as the rest of your batshit post.Am I the only one that tries to read the AFL / AFLW.com site to learn about AFLW football related stuff only to be met with "i'm a lesbian' stories as the main focus.
It's literally every other story gets 'my girlfriend' or 'my wife' shoehorned into the first or second paragraph.
I.Don't.Want.To.Know.Who.They.Are.Making.Love.To.
I don't want to know about the male players either.
Does anyone actually want to read this stuff, or would the AFLW be better served sticking to actual footy stories.
I thought 'Anne Hatchard becomes a lash tech to do her wifes eyelashes' was the pinnacle of "I don't care' stories - and Anne Hatchard of all people! - one of the best AFLW players of all time - surely there are better things to share.
But don't worry, good 'ol Maddy Scholz has it covered.
This was on todays webpage - peak "look at me,look at me - I make love to women!!"
View attachment 2138892
Maybe Scholz should start getting the Footy so kids can 'look up to her' for actually being a good football player - not for being gay.
I doubt if kids give a toss tbh.
Too many agendas in AFLW and it's keeping the sport from growing.
In what way is your comment that belittles another poster's perception of the standard of the game related to the video you shared?Impressive. He knows AFLW started in 2017, and the name Mon Conti. That really helps disguise the nonsense in the rest of the post, which reads like AI-generated garbage.
View attachment 2127783
All the people who hate gay people. That's who gives a ****. If that's not you, congrats, but don't pretend there aren't a lot of them, and that they don't impact the lives of gay people significantly.AFLW is more about sexuality than football glad I'm not the only one that sees it that way, who gives a flying saucer what a person's sexuality is.
Marinoff and Hatchard being prone to a blind hack is hardly new information.In what way is your comment that belittles another poster's perception of the standard of the game related to the video you shared?
Do you realise you are inadvertently supporting that poster's view with the video that references 40% of a player's possessions being turned over?
Oh, playing the poster again, hey?Marinoff and Hatchard being prone to a blind hack is hardly new information.
Nevertheless the commentators do continue to highlight it, as the clip showed, despite the stupid claim in an earlier post.
Do you realise that????? Yes, once you use your brain, you will.
Mindreading not required. Just read the post you're bravely defending, which falsely claims "what is not mentioned about [Marinoff/Hatchard] is the number of turnovers they produce in a game".Oh, playing the poster again, hey?
The fact you didn't even quote the post you were referring to (I only noticed the connection due to the Conti reference), and you picked out one specific element of that post, posted a video without explanation...
Happy to 'use my brain', but most of us aren't mindreaders...
Yeah, right.Mindreading not required. Just read the post you're bravely defending, which falsely claims "what is not mentioned about [Marinoff/Hatchard] is the number of turnovers they produce in a game".
I really don't know how the connection to the clip couldn't be obvious to a sensible person, sorry.