You're just having a sook because the coaches' opinions differ to your own.Clearly reading isn’t a strong suit. One part of my post relates to Cameron.
Too much info for you to comprehend, it’s all good.
Grow up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You're just having a sook because the coaches' opinions differ to your own.Clearly reading isn’t a strong suit. One part of my post relates to Cameron.
Too much info for you to comprehend, it’s all good.
I think the spread of votes is better too. Where both coaches get a 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, there's potentially (however unlikely) 10 players who get votes in each game.I think this is the most accurate of the awards. Not perfect, but the best we have.
Coaches have a better understanding of roles than the umps do. Empirically, I think we also see more votes for rucks and defenders in here vs Brownlow.
Lots of fans seem to prefer the MVP award. But I think that is the weakest of the three. Yes, it's voted on by the players. But it's an end-of-season vote, not game-by-game. So it's the most easily influenced by public opinion and momentum at the end of the season.
Go back to post #1 and read it again, I DGAF about Collingwood players getting votes from coaches, it’s not what I’m trying to discuss.
It’s coaches giving extra votes to their own players despite opposition players having better games. Cameron kicked 7 (3 of them were given to him) yet it’s deemed a better game than Daicos, who made sure Collingwood won. This doesn’t mean Cameron didn’t deserve ANY votes, or that players from losing teams shouldn’t get ANY votes. How is this so hard to comprehend?
Wrong.You're just having a sook because the coaches' opinions differ to your own.
Grow up.
Why’re you being so dramatic? When did I say the whole system was broken?1) Claims that doesn't care about Collingwood players not getting votes.
2) Then rants about Collingwood players not getting enough votes.
2a) Also mentions Jeremy Cameron in eight separate posts in this thread.
If you really care about discussing the validity of AFLCA voting, bring some real analysis and multiple examples from the season you think are biased.
If you want posters to take you seriously, maybe don't focus all your energy on one match where a guy kicked 7 goals and was voted BOG BY BOTH COACHES.... But apparently the whole the god damn system is broken because YOU think another player deserved to be BOG
I thought Daicos was very good. Clearly he had a lot of the ball and his disposal efficiency was high (as it should’ve been with the space he was given, grrrrr).
But perhaps 1 vote (whichever coach it was cast by) was not a bad summation of his output and overall impact?
His 9 score involvement ranked behind Cameron, Adams, Dangerfield and Henry and alongside Atkins. All bar Atkins and Daicos had goal assists or goals also credited to them. Degoey also had 8 score involvements and a goal assist. Additionally, Daicos only had two inside 50s (Danger 11, Adams 5, Duncan 5, Lipinski 4, Mitchell 3).
A very good night at the office no doubt but perhaps not the most impactful person on the ground.
1) Claims that doesn't care about Collingwood players not getting votes.
2) Then rants about Collingwood players not getting enough votes.
2a) Also mentions Jeremy Cameron in eight separate posts in this thread.
If you really care about discussing the validity of AFLCA voting, bring some real analysis and multiple examples from the season you think are biased.
If you want posters to take you seriously, maybe don't focus all your energy on one match where a guy kicked 7 goals and was voted BOG BY BOTH COACHES.... But apparently the whole the god damn system is broken because YOU think another player deserved to be BOG