Agree, one more (double) week and they can likely all go.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
AFLW AFLW Fantasy
- Thread starter samFFC
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Saints2001
Team Captain
- Apr 6, 2018
- 341
- 255
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Ha well - what do I know
At least it's not like Window or Syme are tearing it up...less than 70 points between 4 of them. At least Tripodi phew, and I brought in AOL. Not watching the game but sounds like she's injured or likely to be suspended? If so - bugger...
At least it's not like Window or Syme are tearing it up...less than 70 points between 4 of them. At least Tripodi phew, and I brought in AOL. Not watching the game but sounds like she's injured or likely to be suspended? If so - bugger...
Good to go for this game and I think she'll be okay suspension wise as there wasn't much impact in the tackle, albeit slightly dangerous. Likely to be low impact and a fineHa well - what do I know
At least it's not like Window or Syme are tearing it up...less than 70 points between 4 of them. At least Tripodi phew, and I brought in AOL. Not watching the game but sounds like she's injured or likely to be suspended? If so - bugger...
She's back on, so can't be bad, especially considering this game is well and over.Ha well - what do I know
At least it's not like Window or Syme are tearing it up...less than 70 points between 4 of them. At least Tripodi phew, and I brought in AOL. Not watching the game but sounds like she's injured or likely to be suspended? If so - bugger...
Tossed and turned over who to go out of Garner and Riddell for a while this week. Riddel two points up for me currently, but you wouldn't be upset with either decision, going point for point at the moment.
tigs2010
Pick 1...
The Flying Belgian
Third Tall
Will she? I still think it's more likely you'll see the aggregate applied to prices, which will see a bunch of price rises for DGW teams. I know it seems counter-intuitive but I think it's the way their system is set up.
Are you sure? Free Kick Liam was talking about how it will be be per game, so if there's a high BE, it could be 2 price drops
TBH, doesn't make sense to have aggregate applied. So if Anderson scores 200 total, she would rise in price instead dropping? Imagine if Noffy scores 300 in her DGW and gets priced over $2mil?
Saints2001
Team Captain
- Apr 6, 2018
- 341
- 255
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
According to Jaiden's site:
Double game weeks: Double-game players have new BEs based on their score in Game 1 and the score they need in Game 2 to maintain their previous price.
Anderson's BE for Game #2, in order to maintain her R4 opening price of $1,492k, is 159. So to me it seems like there's some sort of average score to be achieved, not aggregate score. Her Game #1 score was 98 - combined with the 159 seems to reflect a 2 game average for this week of 128ish.
Goody and Window aren't going to make BE. Wendland breaks even. I only have Goody left, but not sure if she's even worth keeping. EDIT: Goody gets final tackle to make BE
The Flying Belgian
Third Tall
I stand corrected. There's nothing on it in the official rules that I can see. Was basing my experience on other fantasy formats.
I would ask where those guys are getting their info from. I don't do social media so I don't really know them.
I would ask where those guys are getting their info from. I don't do social media so I don't really know them.
Last edited:
Saints2001
Team Captain
- Apr 6, 2018
- 341
- 255
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Window's BE is 34, she's on 35 too from what I can see? And Goody is just on her BE of 42. So both should be a touch higher...
Pity about Tripodi's TOG in the last there. She was definitely going to ton up. She may just be a keeper as a forward. I had been looking at trading her out after next week.
Garner only barely made her BE, so will definitely be the more affordable out of her and Riddell. Mia King an option as well, if you cant afford/already have the other two.
I'm in the odd position of being able to loop Riddell's score on Bolter. I think I'll probably just stick with Noffy against Essendon.
Edit: I just noticed that I'm rank 1 on Bolter. Probably temporary, but still nice. Second edit: it's counting Riddell's score twice and Beatty's score on my bench, so who knows where I'm really at. Third edit: didn't even last half an hour. Must be an updating quirk, because I'm now behind top spot by 66 points!
Fourth edit: Tripodi now has a ton! They found her another ten points after the game. Not bad for 64% TOG! Garner also up to 125, so should go up 20K according to Jaiden's stats.
Garner only barely made her BE, so will definitely be the more affordable out of her and Riddell. Mia King an option as well, if you cant afford/already have the other two.
I'm in the odd position of being able to loop Riddell's score on Bolter. I think I'll probably just stick with Noffy against Essendon.
Edit: I just noticed that I'm rank 1 on Bolter. Probably temporary, but still nice. Second edit: it's counting Riddell's score twice and Beatty's score on my bench, so who knows where I'm really at. Third edit: didn't even last half an hour. Must be an updating quirk, because I'm now behind top spot by 66 points!
Fourth edit: Tripodi now has a ton! They found her another ten points after the game. Not bad for 64% TOG! Garner also up to 125, so should go up 20K according to Jaiden's stats.
Last edited:
Imagine what she could be scoring with greated TOG. I knew there were a bunch of tackles not recorded for her.
I doubt I'd be able to afford Garner. I have no cash left and will have to downgrade someone to make money to go from Anderson to Garner. I'd be lucky to afford King.
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Also found a Goody kick
We'll see first how Anderson does against WC and then what kind of downgrade options there are. At worst, you could keep Anderson if you've got a R5 captain option. She should lose the 77 after next week, assuming they do prices the way we expect.
You could also potentially look a week ahead to someone like Gardiner. Again, not ideal, but you're still trading out someone who has played a DG for someone who hasn't in that scenario.
I was thinking about King as an option before the game started, but she may have gone too large. She's going to be over $100K more than Conti. She does have the upside of not having to play against North, though.
AF 6/889 (C Drennan)
12 SI
BOL 4/286
12 SI
BOL 4/286
Yeh, I don't expect Conti to go well against North. They kept saying no one is matching up on Conti (against Carlton), but Carlton are the easiest midfield match up and they have no star midfielders. North have a plethora of stars. Any one of them could go with Conti and shut her down. Plan was to go Anderson and Conti to Riddell and Garner, but the price rises may be too much.
tigs2010
Pick 1...
If I didn't have Hosking to deal with reckon I'd trade the 3 mids for Garner.
That may still be the play and field Beatty for a week with her double score.
That may still be the play and field Beatty for a week with her double score.
I count things the same way.
767/11 with 14 to come
There's going to be some big swings with the DGW prices, bit hard to plan next weeks trades until the dust settles.
Is that the 3 mid rookies? Probably wise as their DGW is coming up and with a couple of low scores could see them bleed a heap of cash, the reverse is true too.
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Yeah Goody, Window and Breed.
Think the DGW is more useful for the lines other than midfield for rooks. Can turn a 30 to a 60 and match a premo.
GrantSpatchcock
Debutant
- Aug 21, 2024
- 142
- 191
- AFL Club
- GWS
Huh, I've been trying to figure out a JHosking replacement with the DGW week and not wanting to spend on that line, why the hell didn't I think of just benching her and focus elsewhere? Thanks, saved me a tonne of research that probably would have went nowhere.
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Only buys us a week.
