The AFL website has spun this as a good news story so the average punter wouldn't recognise it to be a modern day variation of what's alleged to have happened at Hawthorn (admittedly, the early newspaper reports related to Hawthorn claimed harsher controls that generated outrage in many including myself, but these have not been proven).Really?
From purgatory to footy heaven, Cat's ascent of biblical proportions
After being dumped by Adelaide it looked like Tyson Stengle's AFL career was over, but what a year he's hadwww.afl.com.au
It's a really polite way of saying they never let Stengle be by himself, he's got a permanent chaperone, he had to agree all kinds of conditions before they'd give a chance and Geelong gave Betts a job too.
It is all fine because it worked and he got a flag. But its still really paternalistic control and no matter how Geelong dress it up, if his footy wasn't up to scratch they would arseholed him at the end of the season and not given two shits if he ended up in jail and on the pipe.
The role of Eddie Betts is interesting as he was one who did make a public comment when reporters stuck a microphone in his face soon after the initial newspaper story broke and he didn't draw any comparisons between Hawthorn and his role at Geelong. Perhaps the biggest difference is that Stengle may have agreed up front to the conditions imposed on him and Eddie might have been able to work in a mentor / teacher type of role with a genuine understanding of the competing forces of culture and footy, and have the patience and personality to work with Tyson in a way that others in the past were unable to manage as effectively.