Exe Gesis
Kylo was here
- Sep 6, 2005
- 148,224
- 98,258
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
Hey, it's okay. It was bound to occur on me, putting up a big score and getting done still. Usually, the Baggers bring every team down to their level of ugliness.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
As soon as Kolb went out I pencilled this week in as a loss admittedly. I'm just too blood proud to say it out loud normallyZarko so confident against the 1-9 Oaktown he does not even need a QB this week. So he is kinda like the Broncos then..... No QB and still winning.....
Rice getting it makes up for a Jennings injury, lack of QB, and Revis IslandLooks like Zarko will get over me. Damn you Matthews and your fumble-itis, damn you Ravens for deciding this week was the week to keep handing the ball to Ray Rice. Oh and i think it was Jenkins against the Raiders who fumbled on the final play of the game?
Rice getting it makes up for a Jennings injury, lack of QB, and Revis Island
I'll still lose btw. Johnson has only scored the required points in 3 games so far and the Pats won't run it for him to buffer his score.
Will dspeed win?I need Brady to not throw to Gronk tomorrow to secure my win and maintain my 1 game margin over Mordikai/Dspeed in the Central division.
So, I guess what I'm saying is, Go Chiefs LBs!
Injuries curse us all son. I think you would find most WR3s in this league are playable in this league given the fact that starting rosters are so large. Add in the fact that byes took away the better option I had... This is all basic stuff son. Nice to see you continue to cry about me not trading you Decker for scraps though.Surely the best team in the league has more than one decent QB? Also, ypu'd think the best team wouldnt have to play a WR3 (at best), with a shit QB against the best corner in the game??? Please explain.
DeckerInjuries curse us all son. I think you would find most WR3s in this league are playable in this league given the fact that starting rosters are so large. Add in the fact that byes took away the better option I had... This is all basic stuff son. Nice to see you continue to cry about me not trading you Decker for scraps though.
Congrats for getting a decent score for once though!
BTW you got the wrong Steelers receiver....Injuries curse us all son. I think you would find most WR3s in this league are playable in this league given the fact that starting rosters are so large. Add in the fact that byes took away the better option I had... This is all basic stuff son. Nice to see you continue to cry about me not trading you Decker for scraps though.
Congrats for getting a decent score for once though!
Before this week Decker sat at WR10 OVERALL.Decker
My WRs are fine without adding a B grader taking the best corners with Tebow throwing the ball. Lol.
Before this week Decker sat at WR10 OVERALL.
But I'm sure you would prefer Little/Jones/Tampa Mike/Baldwin/Williams/Hankerson in your line up...................................
As for Brown vs Sanders, different roles in the O when Sanders gets healthy. Both good players though.
Trololololol.Absolutely. All have more talent than Decker (Tampa Mike, the most comparable) . Will take time though especially Baldwin and Hankerson.
Decker's screwed being the WR1 and having Tebow throwing the ball. Get a passing QB and a proper WR1 and Decker will be good.
Trololololol.
Stop crying that I didn't trade him to you for scraps and live with it. Enjoy Clayton mk II
When you spend as much time trying to trade for a player and get told no that many times, and have the player maintain good enough form to be in the top 10 WR scorers for as long as Decker has, and THEN to call him a WR3 at best with less talent than everyone in your WR squad... Yes, that is a troll.Is that all you got? Seriously?