Fantasy Alpha Dynasty 2011 - Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Very quiet around here. Zarko's 'streak' must have ended...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Zarko so confident against the 1-9 Oaktown he does not even need a QB this week. So he is kinda like the Broncos then..... No QB and still winning.....
As soon as Kolb went out I pencilled this week in as a loss admittedly. I'm just too blood proud to say it out loud normally :p

You have a hefty head start with Decker on Revis Island and the Steelers on bye!

My life got in the way of waivers.
 
**** you, Alpha.

Had Kevin Smith starting all week, then changed my mind late last night before crashing.

**** you, Mustangs.

Apologies to the long-suffering Baggers fans yet again
baggersfans.jpg
 
Looks like Zarko will get over me. Damn you Matthews and your fumble-itis, damn you Ravens for deciding this week was the week to keep handing the ball to Ray Rice. Oh and i think it was Jenkins against the Raiders who fumbled on the final play of the game?
 
Looks like Zarko will get over me. Damn you Matthews and your fumble-itis, damn you Ravens for deciding this week was the week to keep handing the ball to Ray Rice. Oh and i think it was Jenkins against the Raiders who fumbled on the final play of the game?
Rice getting it makes up for a Jennings injury, lack of QB, and Revis Island

I'll still lose btw. Johnson has only scored the required points in 3 games so far and the Pats won't run it for him to buffer his score.
 
If you do lose that will make up for my bitter disappointment.
Can't let you get 2 games ahead, cos tho i 'could' beat you last game, i'd still need you to lose another game out of your other two and they're 'winnable' games. My fate in your hands, in short.
But if I can stay 1 game behind right thru till week 14, then it's in my hands.

Mind you, Dspeed/Mordikai could take the WC away.
 
Rice getting it makes up for a Jennings injury, lack of QB, and Revis Island

I'll still lose btw. Johnson has only scored the required points in 3 games so far and the Pats won't run it for him to buffer his score.

Surely the best team in the league has more than one decent QB? Also, ypu'd think the best team wouldnt have to play a WR3 (at best), with a shit QB against the best corner in the game??? Please explain.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I need Brady to not throw to Gronk tomorrow to secure my win and maintain my 1 game margin over Mordikai/Dspeed in the Central division.

So, I guess what I'm saying is, Go Chiefs LBs! :thumbsu:
Will dspeed win?
 
Surely the best team in the league has more than one decent QB? Also, ypu'd think the best team wouldnt have to play a WR3 (at best), with a shit QB against the best corner in the game??? Please explain.
Injuries curse us all son. I think you would find most WR3s in this league are playable in this league given the fact that starting rosters are so large. Add in the fact that byes took away the better option I had... This is all basic stuff son. Nice to see you continue to cry about me not trading you Decker for scraps though.

Congrats for getting a decent score for once though!
 
Injuries curse us all son. I think you would find most WR3s in this league are playable in this league given the fact that starting rosters are so large. Add in the fact that byes took away the better option I had... This is all basic stuff son. Nice to see you continue to cry about me not trading you Decker for scraps though.

Congrats for getting a decent score for once though!
Decker :D

My WRs are fine without adding a B grader taking the best corners with Tebow throwing the ball. Lol.
 
Injuries curse us all son. I think you would find most WR3s in this league are playable in this league given the fact that starting rosters are so large. Add in the fact that byes took away the better option I had... This is all basic stuff son. Nice to see you continue to cry about me not trading you Decker for scraps though.

Congrats for getting a decent score for once though!
BTW you got the wrong Steelers receiver....
 
Decker :D

My WRs are fine without adding a B grader taking the best corners with Tebow throwing the ball. Lol.
Before this week Decker sat at WR10 OVERALL.

But I'm sure you would prefer Little/Jones/Tampa Mike/Baldwin/Williams/Hankerson in your line up...................................

As for Brown vs Sanders, different roles in the O when Sanders gets healthy. Both good players though.
 
Before this week Decker sat at WR10 OVERALL.

But I'm sure you would prefer Little/Jones/Tampa Mike/Baldwin/Williams/Hankerson in your line up...................................

As for Brown vs Sanders, different roles in the O when Sanders gets healthy. Both good players though.

Absolutely. All have more talent than Decker (Tampa Mike, the most comparable) . Will take time though especially Baldwin and Hankerson.

Decker's screwed being the WR1 and having Tebow throwing the ball. Get a passing QB and a proper WR1 and Decker will be good.
 
Absolutely. All have more talent than Decker (Tampa Mike, the most comparable) . Will take time though especially Baldwin and Hankerson.

Decker's screwed being the WR1 and having Tebow throwing the ball. Get a passing QB and a proper WR1 and Decker will be good.
Trololololol.

Stop crying that I didn't trade him to you for scraps and live with it. Enjoy Clayton mk II
 
Trololololol.

Stop crying that I didn't trade him to you for scraps and live with it. Enjoy Clayton mk II

Is that all you got? Seriously?
 
Is that all you got? Seriously?
When you spend as much time trying to trade for a player and get told no that many times, and have the player maintain good enough form to be in the top 10 WR scorers for as long as Decker has, and THEN to call him a WR3 at best with less talent than everyone in your WR squad... Yes, that is a troll.

It's all the answer that you deserve.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Fantasy Alpha Dynasty 2011 - Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top