Anthony Albanese - How long? -3-

[kalex6251]

whats all this talk about snouts in the trough?

Peter Dutton's childcare woes - 9News

Peter Dutton is fending off claims he could be ineligible to sit in parliament because of his family trust'...

www.9news.com.au

 

[Jane Doe]

As a cop in the then most corrupt police force in Australian history (?)

Clutching at straws bud.

 

[Jane Doe]

whats all this talk about snouts in the trough?

Peter Dutton's childcare woes - 9News

Peter Dutton is fending off claims he could be ineligible to sit in parliament because of his family trust'...

www.9news.com.au

Have you received your $275 off your power bill that your esteemed leader promised before the last election?

 

[kalex6251]

my last power bill was $12 for the quarter ..... im good thanks

now take your drama queen histrionics and bother someone else

 

[SBD Gonzalez]

Laughable how the Labor party are trying to transform Albanese into a person that can relate to the average person. He has had his snout in the public service for all his working life. At least Dutton has had a job outside of politics.

LOL jog on mate.

 

[Gough]

LOL jog on mate.

Ten years in the Queensland Police force and he couldn't make it past senior constable but we're supposed to believe he's PM material.

 

[Jane Doe]

Ten years in the Queensland Police force and he couldn't make it past senior constable but we're supposed to believe he's PM material.

Here we go. The labor pr machine at it again. What about your beloved leader's creditentials?

 

[Gough]

Here we go. The labor pr machine at it again. What about your beloved leader's creditentials?

Anyone defending the government is part of a pr spin machine but you're just giving your independent and rational point of view. Am I doing it right?

 

[Demons09]

Here we go. The labor pr machine at it again. What about your beloved leader's creditentials?

Don’t worry mate the lefties in here are in denial like they were in the Trump thread.

 

[nut]

Don’t worry mate the lefties in here are in denial like they were in the Trump thread.

American farmers loving Trumps tariff wars…

 

[Jane Doe]

Anyone defending the government is part of a pr spin machine but you're just giving your independent and rational point of view. Am I doing it right?

You defend the prime minister and the labor party to the hilt. They do never wrong in your eyes. Don't take any of your posts seriously at all.

 

[nut]

You defend the prime minister and the labor party to the hilt. They do never wrong in your eyes. Don't take any of your posts seriously at all.

What have they done wrong? I mean seriously which policy would you change?

 

[SBD Gonzalez]

You defend the prime minister and the labor party to the hilt. They do never wrong in your eyes. Don't take any of your posts seriously at all.

Albo's "snout in the public service for all his working life" suggests you're not exactly a bastion of impartiality.

Plus the police are public servants.

Plus it's well documented that the Qld police in Dutton's time were appallingly corrupt and nasty.

Plus there's nothing to suggest he distinguished himself during that time, likewise nothing to suggest he was horrified by the corrupt and nasty behaviour he would have seen around him, and at least a little to suggest he was pretty nasty himself.

But yeah, a "real" job.

PS I don't "defend the prime minister and the labor party to the hilt". I mostly vote Green. Labor have been a big disappointment and I certainly won't be voting for them.

But Blind Freddie can see how much better they've been than the Coalition. I mean why are we even having this discussion.

 

[Bloods86]

Don’t worry mate the lefties in here are in denial like they were in the Trump thread.

What are/were we in denial about? If you can summon more than a vague one sentence jibe.

 

[Jane Doe]

Albo's "snout in the public service for all his working life" suggests you're not exactly a bastion of impartiality.

Plus the police are public servants.

Plus it's well documented that the Qld police in Dutton's time were appallingly corrupt and nasty.

Plus there's nothing to suggest he distinguished himself during that time, likewise nothing to suggest he was horrified by the corrupt and nasty behaviour he would have seen around him, and at least a little to suggest he was pretty nasty himself.

But yeah, a "real" job.

PS I don't "defend the prime minister and the labor party to the hilt". I mostly vote Green. Labor have been a big disappointment and I certainly won't be voting for them.

But Blind Freddie can see how much better they've been than the Coalition. I mean why are we even having this discussion.

So your saying a politician and being a cop are the same? Thats an odd take.

"I defend the prime minister and the labor party to the hilt" was not directed at you and you know that.

Yeah blind freddie can tell the labor party are so much better and doing such a great job. They are doing such a great job they are behind in most polls.

Albanese is a weak and indecisive leader. Who has no idea how the average person in the suburbs is travelling.

But you and your mates keep being in denial. Its just like the trump thread before he won the election last year. Its just laughable how you and your mates defend the labor party.

 

[Saint]

So your saying a politician and being a cop are the same? Thats an odd take.

"I defend the prime minister and the labor party to the hilt" was not directed at you and you know that.

Yeah blind freddie can tell the labor party are so much better and doing such a great job. They are doing such a great job they are behind in most polls.

Albanese is a weak and indecisive leader. Who has no idea how the average person in the suburbs is travelling.

But you and your mates keep being in denial. Its just like the trump thread before he won the election last year. Its just laughable how you and your mates defend the labor party.

I think your sentence about Albo is true, but I also think the ALP are doing a better job than the LNP.

I think Albanese is the albatross around the job the ALP are doing. They're not seen to be leading because their leaders seems intent on not leading in case he gets attacked by the conservative media for it.

 

[Bloods86]

So your saying a politician and being a cop are the same? Thats an odd take.

"I defend the prime minister and the labor party to the hilt" was not directed at you and you know that.

Yeah blind freddie can tell the labor party are so much better and doing such a great job. They are doing such a great job they are behind in most polls.

Albanese is a weak and indecisive leader. Who has no idea how the average person in the suburbs is travelling.

But you and your mates keep being in denial. Its just like the trump thread before he won the election last year. Its just laughable how you and your mates defend the labor party.

"I'm not accusing you personally of defending Labor too much, but it's laughable how you're in denial and defending Labor."

What exactly are "we" in denial about? That's the 2nd such comment today, and in relation to Trump, where it goes unspecified.

 

[SBD Gonzalez]

So your saying a politician and being a cop are the same? Thats an odd take.

No. I'm saying they are both public servants, which is what you were tangentially criticising Albanese for being.

If you want to make the case that cops are more important than politicians, go right ahead. A nation with a police force but no government. Gee wouldn't that be a swell place to be?

"I defend the prime minister and the labor party to the hilt" was not directed at you and you know that.

You certainly implied you were directing it at everyone, with your "labor pr machine at it again" comment. So just take my comment as further enrichment of the discursive background.

Yeah blind freddie can tell the labor party are so much better and doing such a great job. They are doing such a great job they are behind in most polls.

Yes coz, the people are always right. They smashed John Howard for Kevin Rudd, and Rudd's government was such a raging success, wasn't it?

Albanese is a weak and indecisive leader.

He is overly cautious, when a lot of voters wanted clear change from the horrible Coalition years. Admittedly he is starting to make noises about being more reforming in a second term, but the big question is whether he will even get a second majority term at this rate.

Who has no idea how the average person in the suburbs is travelling.

Gee whiz, a politician with decades of experience from the very bottom to the very top, and yet he doesn't know that his party constantly runs focus groups, and conducts seat-by-seat polling. You should tell him!

But you and your mates keep being in denial. Its just like the trump thread before he won the election last year. Its just laughable how you and your mates defend the labor party.

I already explained. I don't defend Labor. I mostly vote Green.

But I can still see (as you clearly can't) how important it was for the good of the nation that Labor replaced that truly terrible Coalition government. Do list the achievements of them in their near-decade in power.

PS if it was so certain Trump was going to win (by a whopping 1% of the vote in the end, as it happens), why didn't you tell all the polling companies?

 

[Bloods86]

No. I'm saying they are both public servants, which is what you were tangentially criticising Albanese for being.

If you want to make the case that cops are more important than politicians, go right ahead. A nation with a police force but no government. Gee wouldn't that be a swell place to be?


You certainly implied you were directing it at everyone, with your "labor pr machine at it again" comment. So just take my comment as further enrichment of the discursive background.


Yes coz, the people are always right. They smashed John Howard for Kevin Rudd, and Rudd's government was such a raging success, wasn't it?



He is overly cautious, when a lot of voters wanted clear change from the horrible Coalition years. Admittedly he is starting to make noises about being more reforming in a second term, but the big question is whether he will even get a second majority term at this rate.

Gee whiz, a politician with decades of experience from the very bottom to the very top, and yet he doesn't know that his party constantly runs focus groups, and conducts seat-by-seat polling. You should tell him!

I already explained. I don't defend Labor. I mostly vote Green.

But I can still see (as you clearly can't) how important it was for the good of the nation that Labor replaced that truly terrible Coalition government. Do list the achievements of them in their near-decade in power.

PS if it was so certain Trump was going to win (by a whopping 1% of the vote in the end, as it happens), why didn't you tell all the polling companies?

Certainly seems strange that some posters seem to have no political principles of their own by taking the position that polling/election results equates to the winner being objectively better for the electorate.

But then despite the fact that polls/results swing back and forth, they somehow seem to have distinct biases toward conservative parties/against lefter leaning ones.

 

[Demons09]

So your saying a politician and being a cop are the same? Thats an odd take.

"I defend the prime minister and the labor party to the hilt" was not directed at you and you know that.

Yeah blind freddie can tell the labor party are so much better and doing such a great job. They are doing such a great job they are behind in most polls.

Albanese is a weak and indecisive leader. Who has no idea how the average person in the suburbs is travelling.

But you and your mates keep being in denial. Its just like the trump thread before he won the election last year. Its just laughable how you and your mates defend the labor party.

It’s laughable how out of touch they are with folk out there.

 

[Jane Doe]

"I'm not accusing you personally of defending Labor too much, but it's laughable how you're in denial and defending Labor."

What exactly are "we" in denial about? That's the 2nd such comment today, and in relation to Trump, where it goes unspecified.

Its pretty well known in this group how left leaning it is.

 

[Jane Doe]

No. I'm saying they are both public servants, which is what you were tangentially criticising Albanese for being.

If you want to make the case that cops are more important than politicians, go right ahead. A nation with a police force but no government. Gee wouldn't that be a swell place to be?


You certainly implied you were directing it at everyone, with your "labor pr machine at it again" comment. So just take my comment as further enrichment of the discursive background.


Yes coz, the people are always right. They smashed John Howard for Kevin Rudd, and Rudd's government was such a raging success, wasn't it?



He is overly cautious, when a lot of voters wanted clear change from the horrible Coalition years. Admittedly he is starting to make noises about being more reforming in a second term, but the big question is whether he will even get a second majority term at this rate.

Gee whiz, a politician with decades of experience from the very bottom to the very top, and yet he doesn't know that his party constantly runs focus groups, and conducts seat-by-seat polling. You should tell him!

I already explained. I don't defend Labor. I mostly vote Green.

But I can still see (as you clearly can't) how important it was for the good of the nation that Labor replaced that truly terrible Coalition government. Do list the achievements of them in their near-decade in power.

PS if it was so certain Trump was going to win (by a whopping 1% of the vote in the end, as it happens), why didn't you tell all the polling companies?

You could argue the case the country has not been the same since Howard was voted out (I can almost hear you choking on your cafe latte from here).

You would think a politician with decades of experience could communicate better with the public and sell his message than Albanese has

Again, my original post was not directed at you in terms of defending labor. You need to open your other eye.

Personally I was always confident of Trump beating Harris. Just had to watch a Harris press conference to see why. Pretty oblivous to some people here.

 

[Bloods86]

Its pretty well known in this group how left leaning it is.

What does that have to do with a) my post that you're responding to, and b) with what is actually being said in this thread by left leaning posters, versus what you imagine they are saying.

Plenty of us say Labor is not doing a good or good enough job, but they are better than the Coalition.

Instead of that actually sinking in, you interpret it as "Omg you guys love Labor so much it's laughable".

There's a few that cheerlead a bit hard from my perspective, but it's generally using the same economic factors that conservatives love to froth about when it suits them.

 

[Jane Doe]

What does that have to do with a) my post that you're responding to, and b) with what is actually being said in this thread by left leaning posters, versus what you imagine they are saying.

Plenty of us say Labor is not doing a good or good enough job, but they are better than the Coalition.

Instead of that actually sinking in, you interpret it as "Omg you guys love Labor so much it's laughable".

There's a few that cheerlead a bit hard from my perspective, but it's generally using the same economic factors that conservatives love to froth about when it suits them.

A few that cheerlead a bit hard? That is most understatement that I have read on here.