This is an interesting debate. On our average (both form and results) you'd say we aren't a contender.
BUT ...
+ This is a roller coaster year. Anything goes.
+/- The Doggies broke the mould last year by not being top four, but, we would need to travel probably every week which they didn't.
+ The bulk of this team did get us to a GF two years ago.
- The final is played on the 'G which we don't seem to like.
+/- The top three seem to have the jump on the rest, but, they still have their hiccups.
+ With the exception of maybe Parto we have tried a few young'uns and a few older players may now be 'depth' so we may be finally finding our best 22*. (*I deliberately didn't mention Lecca and Pridda - there's enough elsewhere on that!)
+ Our good does seem pretty good.
- Our bad is very bad.
+ The FTB tag is NOT justified as we can/have beaten better sides.
So even after shattering losses - where I think we are freakin' useless - I then think 'well we are not out of it ... yet'.
On balance ... I'd say we aren't in contention. But then again ...
BUT ...
+ This is a roller coaster year. Anything goes.
+/- The Doggies broke the mould last year by not being top four, but, we would need to travel probably every week which they didn't.
+ The bulk of this team did get us to a GF two years ago.
- The final is played on the 'G which we don't seem to like.
+/- The top three seem to have the jump on the rest, but, they still have their hiccups.
+ With the exception of maybe Parto we have tried a few young'uns and a few older players may now be 'depth' so we may be finally finding our best 22*. (*I deliberately didn't mention Lecca and Pridda - there's enough elsewhere on that!)
+ Our good does seem pretty good.
- Our bad is very bad.
+ The FTB tag is NOT justified as we can/have beaten better sides.
So even after shattering losses - where I think we are freakin' useless - I then think 'well we are not out of it ... yet'.
On balance ... I'd say we aren't in contention. But then again ...