That’s my point. When did Australia become such a sick democracy.What media?
Murdoch and 9 are in on the whole scam and the ABC frankly has given up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s my point. When did Australia become such a sick democracy.What media?
Murdoch and 9 are in on the whole scam and the ABC frankly has given up.
Over a million? Don't think so.As if Dutton and Albanese give 2 shits for the Uighurs.it's just a handy tool for their criminal defence spending.You glossed over the million plus uighurs in concentration camps for the crime of wanting independence from a country they have nothing in common with. Not ethnically, not linguistically, not genetically.
They dont give a shit about them personally no.It
Over a million? Don't think so.As if Dutton and Albanese give 2 shits for the Uighurs.it's just a handy tool for their criminal defence spending.
We have children in jails and refugees locked up and all our money goes to the top 5%.
They don't have homeless people in China. We use more fossil fuels per capita than anyone in the world and we are a racist country with racist political parties.
You might be getting confused with vietnam here bud.I'm with you except for the Korean war, which was a case of the US committing unimaginable war crimes.
They were depopulating the North of the country, via use of incendiary explosives, chemical and biological weapons, in a way few states ever have.
There is a reason the "forgotten war" narrative is pushed so aggressively. Truly behaviour that would have been worthy of the axis powers.
Well either theres a lot of uighurs want independance, or the chinese have locked up a million people for nothing.Be a bit more honest. A lot are there for supporting jihadist movements, not all Uyghurs want an independent state (the East Turkestan movement is a tiny minority group), and it just so happens that it's happening in a key region of the nation that if it became independent would cut off the majority of China's population in the East from the Silk Road land trade routes to the East, further boxing the nation in. Obviously some neocons would love for Xinjiang to break off from China for their own geopolitical goals.
Interesting contribution, thanks for including it.So how do the countries who share our part of the world feel about our sub announcement?
Reckon that's something our media should have put front and centre of its assessment of the deal.
Did a quick run around of the major dudes and here's the verdict:
Malaysia - opposed
Indonesia - opposed but want more details. Currently opposed to allowing nuclear powered vessels in Indonesian waters
Singapore - supports
Japan - Supports
Fiji - supports
Japan - supports
Phillipines - supports
NZ - no comment but reiterates existing policy to not allow nuclear powered subs in NZ waters
Fill in more as you find them.
Oh und fuxed that for you bruNZ - no communt but reuterates uxistung policy to not allow nuclear powered subs in uNZ waters
Fill in more as you find them.
3 million out of 1.4 billion is a far far lower % than any other major country.They dont give a s**t about them personally no.
They just understand that’s how the chinese treat those who oppose them.
Who are the Uyghurs and why is China being accused of genocide? - BBC News
China has been accused by the US of genocide and crimes against humanity against the Muslim minority group.www.bbc.com
No homeless in china? You havnt been there have you.
Homelessness in China - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Not even close, but you knew thatUs. Like it or not.
Attack the politicians all you like, leave the poor bastards that paid the sacrifice in peace.
You said there was no homeless - i simply corrected that falsehood.3 million out of 1.4 billion is a far far lower % than any other major country.
There's 20,000 social workers to aid them as well.
Still not good enough reasons to provoke WW3, you can't ram your own dogma down the throats of sovereign nations.
Sadly the politicians are no better informed on a lot the issues they make decisions on.This thread...
View attachment 1631180
You said have I ever been to China inferring that homeless people are everywhere.You said there was no homeless - i simply corrected that falsehood.
They are dude.You said have I ever been to China inferring that homeless people are everywhere.
Cheaper AND more effective.If I'm getting this right. the deal was set in play by the Coalition after they cancelled the French subs contract
If Labor pulled out of the deal, that would be Australia ******* over France, the US and the UK in the space of two years which would have looked terrible on the world stage
These subs seem to be mostly to appease the US and don't really help much with the defence of our nation. Plus we've angered the Chinese even more who are a major trading partner
If we truly wanted to defend our nation there are cheaper and more effective options available
Is that the gist of it?
Yes, it is just another Morrison screw up.If I'm getting this right. the deal was set in play by the Coalition after they cancelled the French subs contract
If Labor pulled out of the deal, that would be Australia ******* over France, the US and the UK in the space of two years which would have looked terrible on the world stage
These subs seem to be mostly to appease the US and don't really help much with the defence of our nation. Plus we've angered the Chinese even more who are a major trading partner
If we truly wanted to defend our nation there are cheaper and more effective options available
Is that the gist of it?
So how do the countries who share our part of the world feel about our sub announcement?
Reckon that's something our media should have put front and centre of its assessment of the deal.
Did a quick run around of the major dudes and here's the verdict:
Malaysia - opposed
Indonesia - opposed but want more details. Currently opposed to allowing nuclear powered vessels in Indonesian waters
Singapore - supports
Japan - Supports
Fiji - supports
Japan - supports
Phillipines - supports
NZ - no comment but reiterates existing policy to not allow nuclear powered subs in NZ waters
Fill in more as you find them.
Missiles would be better. If an invading army was en route to Australia, we could bomb the sh!t out of them as soon as they entered our territorial waters. A small supply of nukes would be good too. Just as a deterrent to other nuclear powers. Sure the likes of China & others could nuke us into oblivion, but if the price they had to pay to do that was to get hit 10 nukes from us, would they be prepared to pay it? I don't think so.If I'm getting this right. the deal was set in play by the Coalition after they cancelled the French subs contract
If Labor pulled out of the deal, that would be Australia ******* over France, the US and the UK in the space of two years which would have looked terrible on the world stage
These subs seem to be mostly to appease the US and don't really help much with the defence of our nation. Plus we've angered the Chinese even more who are a major trading partner
If we truly wanted to defend our nation there are cheaper and more effective options available
Is that the gist of it?
Missiles would be better. If an invading army was en route to Australia, we could bomb the sh!t out of them as soon as they entered our territorial waters. A small supply of nukes would be good too. Just as a deterrent to other nuclear powers. Sure the likes of China & others could nuke us into oblivion, but if the price they had to pay to do that was to get hit 10 nukes from us, would they be prepared to pay it? I don't think so.