Trade Requested Bailey Smith

Remove this Banner Ad

Geelong will paint the Dogs into a corner like they did the Pies with Henry. Their first move will be to trade a future second in an unrelated deal so their future first is not available to trade.
I think in the Henry case it was a future second to Brisbane for picks.
Incidentally didn’t Brisbane also do similar in the Dunkley trade?
you mean Geelong fattened up the deal for Collingwood by trading up picks. Pies were never, ever getting 2 firsts for O Henry lmfao
 

Log in to remove this ad.

From menory we traded 38 55 a future 2nd and future 4th for 25 to bris (bris got a good deal there and i think they used one of our picks in the dunkley deal).
I think to be fair we would offer 15 and a future 2nd to the dogs (thats good faith) before we do what you are suggesting.
We would only then trade the future 2nd away and lock the future 1st if things were clearly at an impasse etc.
Only thing is future picks are worth less specially in this years draft where 70 players are expected to be selected
your F2 might fall to around 30-35 but would only get a pick around 50-55 in this years draft
 
I do too but depends if Doggies think it’s enough or want to drag it out.

15 and 35 is 1634 points or equivalent to Pick 8 right?

Not bad for an OOC player who hasn’t played in over a year.

View attachment 2118845
Never go full points. The Dogs don't need points. It's worth about pick 18 on trade night (will be 20 and 40).
 
It reminds me a lot of Henry.

More than a few Pies supporters were huffing and puffing about "Pick 7 or we'll send him to the draft!" and in the end Collingwood accepted Pick 25.

If a player is out of contract and determined to leave, their existing club is in a weak position. That's not some nuffie Geelong conspiracy, that's just the facts.
We didn't accept just pick 25.
 
I do too but depends if Doggies think it’s enough or want to drag it out.

15 and 35 is 1634 points or equivalent to Pick 8 right?

Not bad for an OOC player who hasn’t played in over a year.

View attachment 2118845
#1) The points system is laughable and anyone who uses it as "fair value" is out of touch. (like a politician out of touch)
#2) WB should ask for this years 1st, 2025 1st with a 2nd rounder as a minimum.

In reality that will look something like #20, #20 and #35. And without any high pick that still seems like unders for what would be essentially be your best player for the next 8 years.
 
#1) The points system is laughable and anyone who uses it as "fair value" is out of touch. (like a politician out of touch)
#2) WB should ask for this years 1st, 2025 1st with a 2nd rounder as a minimum.

In reality that will look something like #20, #20 and #35. And without any high pick that still seems like unders for what would be essentially be your best player for the next 8 years.

Really. Maybe we didn't have the best year this year but really.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Trade Requested Bailey Smith

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top