Barrett- Pies offer Treloar 5 years at $700k

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
No idea - don't know your list well enough - so I'll say.... Pendlebury and your first rounder;):p


giphy.gif
 
No idea - don't know your list well enough - so I'll say.... Pendlebury and your first rounder;):p

I was thinking maybe Tony Armstrong plus a couple of rookie picks but Im sure we can meet somewhere in the middle
 
We would not give you Witts anyway, Witts is a better player then blokes like Lobb. No one wants to play at a club in west Sydney with no history no fans and no tradition. Also if we are going of Twitter Treloar tweeted how much he liked playing on ANZAC day saying he would love it to be a regular fixture. If he comes to the Pies it will be and he will play infront of 10 times as many people.

Touch harsh?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Who would Collingwood get to replace Witts?

Grundy.........[backup option].........Cox?

Mature body rucks are vital.

I'm not convinced Collingwood would have the trade capital to bring in someone else after getting in Treloar.
It's all about finding the right player. Especially when we're talking potential ruckmen since clubs only play 1 not, there would be a potential player on every list. The one standout in AFL would be Currie at the moment. He's not getting a game anytime soon, is fairly highly rated. Would back himself in over Grundy and at the moment a late 2nd-3rd rounder should get the job done.
 
It's all about finding the right player. Especially when we're talking potential ruckmen since clubs only play 1 not, there would be a potential player on every list. The one standout in AFL would be Currie at the moment. He's not getting a game anytime soon, is fairly highly rated. Would back himself in over Grundy and at the moment a late 2nd-3rd rounder should get the job done.
Luenburger is a free agent too, if he is up to it.
 
It's all about finding the right player. Especially when we're talking potential ruckmen since clubs only play 1 not, there would be a potential player on every list. The one standout in AFL would be Currie at the moment. He's not getting a game anytime soon, is fairly highly rated. Would back himself in over Grundy and at the moment a late 2nd-3rd rounder should get the job done.

Currie is awful. Gawn from Melbourne?
 
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-05-01/treloar-rubbishes-magpie-rumour-expects-to-sign-soon-

"I did hear about that yesterday," Treloar said at Domain Stadium on Friday morning. "And it's the first I've heard of it.

"That's just all speculation. That's just the media doing what media does best in making stories up.

"I am very happy here. I love the Giants. At the moment all I care about is playing footy. I've got a great management team who really look after me. They take care of all that stuff and I'm here to play footy."

Treloar said he was committed to the Giants and wanted to end the speculation sooner rather than later.

"Once it all gets settled down we can end that speculation because it's all nonsense," Treloar said.

Sounds pretty emphatic. It's of course possible this is just a facade for the media but generally players aren't his strong in their stance.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Maybe I should type slower so you can grasp the meaning... No, it isn't a fact that we might never see him again, it's a possibility we might never see him again.

Facepalm alright!

Um... are you serious?

Is it a fact a coin MIGHT land on heads when you toss it? Yes... yes it is. You're embarrassing yourself now
 
Um... are you serious?

Is it a fact a coin MIGHT land on heads when you toss it? Yes... yes it is. You're embarrassing yourself now

Seriously... whatever!
 
well aren't you the lucky one!
 
So what did he say we had to give up to get Treloar?
Who would Collingwood get to replace Witts?

Grundy.........[backup option].........Cox?

Mature body rucks are vital.

I'm not convinced Collingwood would have the trade capital to bring in someone else after getting in Treloar.
I highly doubt we'll trade Witts, with the sub rule most likely getting scrapped for next season most teams will start playing 2 ruckmen again
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top