Shot
BBL Match 23 Melbourne Renegades v Melbourne Stars 4/1 1845hrs @ the MCG
- Thread starter Gough
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Nov 25, 2017
- 13,783
- 12,420
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
121m or 2× Eden Park
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
121m six lol
NSWCROW
Make me an Admin!
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Gades should have run Cartwright out and caught Maxwell…
There’s the game
There’s the game
Entertaining game
smasha
It's Time!
Entertaining game in the end.
Stars just win.
Stars just win.
smasha
It's Time!
Fantastic crowd of over 40k for two bottom teams.
Still have pulling power.
Still have pulling power.
- Apr 22, 2017
- 11,229
- 10,309
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Nationals, Pelicans
For all the hype the Renegades are gonna be hard pressed to make the finals. A few decent starts from JFM and the Gades are probably 4-2. He's in the running with Hurst for the Worst and Unfairest Award.
nobbyiscool
Brownlow Medallist
- Aug 11, 2006
- 23,021
- 25,548
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
- Other Teams
- TasTigers, JJs, MV, CRaiders, PhEagles
Do we have a resident geek on the cricket board that someone can tag for me? I have a maths and/or physics question.
Fox Sports give us that data of ball speed in, ball speed out, and bat speed.
Fox Sports give us that data of ball speed in, ball speed out, and bat speed.
- what is the unit of measurement denoting the impact of the bat itself? Is it force? Is it power?
- what would be the mathematical equation for working out the value of that unit of measurement?
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
To a degree but you still got a decent total, flopped in the field late. I’ll never understand why you have fast bowlers fielding at point lol
Cleavy
Hall of Famer
E = mc squared x “made it up”
cats_09
Otters United
- Jun 21, 2011
- 67,876
- 141,196
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Moderator
- #342
I know there's been chat in here of blowing up the Stars and starting again, but kinda want to do the same with the Gades - especially our bowling unit which has seemed rather limp most of this season
I know Rogers has been our strike bowler over recent seasons, likely our current leading wicket taker with 11 but he seems to be very predictable and not exactly someone seen as a partnership breaker unless the surge has been called & batsmen get themselves out
When there's something in the pitch he's looked dangerous, otherwise opposition batsmen don't seem too troubled by him. Add in that he's also proven something of a liability in the field with the dropped catch of Maxwell tonight, and in the first game the missed runout of Henriques - looked like we tried to hide him tonight but that's not a permanent option, and he's a slightly frustrating player
Richardson has also been hit & miss going back to last season - he has only the 3 wickets so far this season to go with just the 6 from 7 matches last season and he's simply getting smacked around the park each match
Crone is 27 - made his debut for us tonight. So is he a long term option that just needs to find his feet or nothing more than a fill in?
O'Neill seems to have been made a scapegoat from a bowling perspective after going for 11 from his 1 over last match. Don't think they can use the excuse he was sore as he was fielding tonight. He looked an exciting prospect last season and would like to see what he has to offer if they trust him a bit more
I'd like to see at least one of O'Neill & Crone in the 11 the rest of the season - they may go for a few runs, but so are the more experienced players and wouldn't mind seeing what they have to offer over our remaining games
Sutherland is another who hasn't performed as well with the ball in hand as would have been expected - 5 wickets in his first two games, only 2 wickets in our next 4. I also wouldn't mind someone like Finch working with him from a tactical side of things as I think we've got it wrong in the field the last couple of mattress and made it way too easy for the chasing team
The one player tonight who tonight was willing to keep pitching it up on that hard to hit length was Sandhu and he was rewarded with 3 wickets, plus a run out during his first over
Not sure who our bowling coach is but they suck - seriously, we saw how hard it is to hit the ball of a good length but too often we seem reluctant to continually hit that good spot and try to get too fancy with what we do
I know Rogers has been our strike bowler over recent seasons, likely our current leading wicket taker with 11 but he seems to be very predictable and not exactly someone seen as a partnership breaker unless the surge has been called & batsmen get themselves out
When there's something in the pitch he's looked dangerous, otherwise opposition batsmen don't seem too troubled by him. Add in that he's also proven something of a liability in the field with the dropped catch of Maxwell tonight, and in the first game the missed runout of Henriques - looked like we tried to hide him tonight but that's not a permanent option, and he's a slightly frustrating player
Richardson has also been hit & miss going back to last season - he has only the 3 wickets so far this season to go with just the 6 from 7 matches last season and he's simply getting smacked around the park each match
Crone is 27 - made his debut for us tonight. So is he a long term option that just needs to find his feet or nothing more than a fill in?
O'Neill seems to have been made a scapegoat from a bowling perspective after going for 11 from his 1 over last match. Don't think they can use the excuse he was sore as he was fielding tonight. He looked an exciting prospect last season and would like to see what he has to offer if they trust him a bit more
I'd like to see at least one of O'Neill & Crone in the 11 the rest of the season - they may go for a few runs, but so are the more experienced players and wouldn't mind seeing what they have to offer over our remaining games
Sutherland is another who hasn't performed as well with the ball in hand as would have been expected - 5 wickets in his first two games, only 2 wickets in our next 4. I also wouldn't mind someone like Finch working with him from a tactical side of things as I think we've got it wrong in the field the last couple of mattress and made it way too easy for the chasing team
The one player tonight who tonight was willing to keep pitching it up on that hard to hit length was Sandhu and he was rewarded with 3 wickets, plus a run out during his first over
Not sure who our bowling coach is but they suck - seriously, we saw how hard it is to hit the ball of a good length but too often we seem reluctant to continually hit that good spot and try to get too fancy with what we do
Good to see the shit Tom Rogers gifting the Stars a win, lucky they didn’t listen to Bigfooty and get rid of the Big Show.
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
not saying put him at deep mid but how about not in a catching position there’s a middle ground there
To be unable to go at a run a ball in the first four overs and lose 2 wickets is not good enough.
Their go hell for leather strategy in the first power surge s failed. The Gades don't have the length in their line up to do that.
Their go hell for leather strategy in the first power surge s failed. The Gades don't have the length in their line up to do that.
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Has to be, enough of the two hacks being 2 for squat.
If they played normal cricket shots (given only 2 players are outside the circle), took the singles etc then they would have a much better start to the match.
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Similar threads
