Some real delusion going on here. I've pointed out your errors line by line as follows:
Teague's coaching had flaws, but one of the flaws was not the inability to give forwards shots. We played a very attacking gameplan and there were certainly opportunities for forwards. Injuries played a part sure, but he hasn't contributed in 3 years, injury or no.
One of the key components of defence is no lapses. You lapse as a forward and the team can still be ok once in awhile. Every time you lapse as a backman there will be a score against you or the team as your teammates have to cover. The only way he makes it as a defender if is he's able to give consistent effort throughout the game and let the play come to him. He certainly hasn't demonstrated anything to show he has that sort of depseration that say Jones/Weiters have.
Second fastest speed at our club means what. Top sprint speed? This is nice, but he'd be much more valuable if he was able to up the amount of sprints per game, even if he didn't have the same top level speed. As it is, there are way too few sprint efforts for his speed to mean anything.
Best shot on goal? What is this based on?
Part of a poorly coached team? Yes true, but it hasn't affected the forwards.
Waste of talent IF he failed to make it? He's been the biggest waste on our list to date. High salary, high draft capital, low output.
TL;DR: I, like everyone else hope he turns it around. But it's time we left the excuses at the door. He needs to get fit, stay healthy but more importantly give the 100% effort guys like JSOS bring to every game.
I think you will see how good he can be if he gets fit and plays enough consecutive games to get match fit.
I don't think he plays with lack of effort or concentration and have no idea where this theory comes from.
I see a guy playing a ridiculous role which was pretty much to get out of the way of the other forwards, a decoy role. Our forward line tactics were deplorable. Another theory that we should throw out the window was that Teague had us playing attacking and high scoring football, we weren't, we couldn't produce scores and we couldn't produce repeat entries. We set a few individuals up to score but not all of them, Teague's system failed to utilise all forwards, it was a disaster. Thinking Teague had our forward line going well is totally delusional, tactically it was a basketcase.
McGovern looked like someone playing a role he had no idea how to play, that's what it looked like to me. We talk about of out of position but being played in a role he couldn't play is up there. Like Setterfield on a wing McGovern can't play the third tall decoy role, that role should not exist.
He's played small portions of defence and did not look out of place. He has every tool in the book to be a terrific defender however he needs to stay fit and injury free. He's a tallish player with lightning speed and a big leap and strength, he's the ideal third tall who should be able to play smaller or taller.
He is one of the best kicks for goal in our side, based on the fact he misses less often than the rest. He's a great kick.
He's someone who came from Adelaide to a club with no high performance program, hasn't ever been fully fit, has been made to work harder and get fit under Andrew Russell and has since been injured regularly. Has only played after a month or two off and hasn't played much more than 3 or 4 games in a row for the last 4 years. It's not that he can't play or that he's lazy or that he lapses, it's that he's injured consistent. Same with a few others on the list. If he gets fit and gets a run of form he's going to be in the team in some capacity.
Teague did him no favours and neither has his body but he can play and I hope we get to see that. Same with a few others on our list.