I'm not disagreeing with you but Brownlows are hardly a measuring stick.
To name a few, Darcy, Teasdale, Cooney, Woewodin, Wilson, & Hardie.
Did Luke Darcy win one?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I'm not disagreeing with you but Brownlows are hardly a measuring stick.
To name a few, Darcy, Teasdale, Cooney, Woewodin, Wilson, & Hardie.
Did Luke Darcy win one?
Was thinking of Wynd. Probably a bit harsh on him though.Did Luke Darcy win one?
The fact that there's no Johnny Greening, James Clement or Peter Moore in that "Team of the Century" just makes it defunct in my eyes. Shawy was a great little skipper and a wonderful role model but Ronnie Wearmouth was a far better player. It's a bit like replacing Nuts Coventry with Maxy or Jock McHale with Mick!!
Peter Moore won a Brownlow for goodness sakes!
Like Ronnie wearmouth also, but there is no way l would have him in front Tony Shaw. Tony ended up a great player and captain for all his limitationsThe fact that there's no Johnny Greening, James Clement or Peter Moore in that "Team of the Century" just makes it defunct in my eyes. Shawy was a great little skipper and a wonderful role model but Ronnie Wearmouth was a far better player. It's a bit like replacing Nuts Coventry with Maxy or Jock McHale with Mick!!
Peter Moore won a Brownlow for goodness sakes!
How very dare you punk?!Was thinking of Wynd. Probably a bit harsh on him though.
Point still stands.
Played 2 years in that time frame, 1 very good year and 1 average one. If we were going back to say '85, then he's in, no doubt. Can see your point though.Millane?
He was, but it was just that - 2 years. McGuane was outstanding player for longer and would've been even longer than that without injuries, IMO anyway.I would have Tarrant in over Monkey and probably Thomas over McGuane
I hate Daisy but he was incredible in those GF years.
Good team, on a quick look I'dThought I'd update this a bit, my team of the last 30 years (1990-Current):
FB: Maxwell Prestigiacomo H.Shaw
HB: Crosisca Clement B.Johnson
C: Sidebottom Buckley G.Brown
HF: Didak T.Cloke P. Williams
FF: Davis S.Rocca P.Daicos
R: Grundy Pendlebury Swan
I/C: Monkhurst McGuane Burns Treloar
EMG: A.Rocca Beams Reid Wright
Slight changesI love this sort of thing, so from the flag year 1990 onwards, with minimum two seasons with us:
B. J Clement ~ G Pert ~ S Burns
HB. S Morwood ~ B Reid ~ M McGuane
C. D Millane ~ N Buckley (c) ~ G Brown
HF. P Daicos ~ T Cloke ~ M Williams
F. J Elliott ~ S Rocca ~ A Didak
R. D Jolly ~ S Pendlebury ~ D Swan
I. B Grundy ~ A Treloar ~ L Ball ~ A Shaw
C. L Matthews
E. H Shaw, T Francis, S Sidebottom
Mark Williams (who doesn't qualify)? Or do you mean Paul?Slight changes
Sidebottom gets in for sure now.
Jolly out, Grundy the first ruck.
1990 onwards
B. J Clement ~ G Pert ~ S Burns
HB. S Morwood ~ B Reid ~ M McGuane
C. D Millane ~ N Buckley (c) ~ G Brown
HF. P Daicos ~ T Cloke ~ M Williams
F. J Elliott ~ S Rocca ~ A Didak
R. B Grundy ~ S Pendlebury ~ D Swan
I. S Sidebottom ~ A Treloar ~ L Ball ~ A Shaw
C. L Matthews
You are 100% correct.Mark Williams (who doesn't qualify)? Or do you mean Paul?
I love picking these sorts of teams as well, but it's always hard to know just what "rules" you're supposed to be following. I guess there just aren't any, apart from the 1990> bit in this case! Are you meant to pick players based on their absolute best football played for us in that time, even if it has only lasted for a year or two (that allows the likes of Grundy and Millane to be picked) or should it be on "body of work" (Monkhorst and probably Jolly would be in front of Grundy if it was done on that basis, but Grundy's best is almost certainly miles in front of his rivals)?
Now correctedMark Williams (who doesn't qualify)? Or do you mean Paul?
I think recentism (apparently that really is a word!!) can be a real issue. I couldn't put the likes of Elliott, Treloar, or even Ball in the team, and leave Graham Wright (a fantastic player) out, for instance. Elliott is an absolute favourite current player, but I (we all) would love to see him string together a few seasons now where he can play a lot of games and show that he belongs in such company.^ actually I look at the above and Beams and Paul Williams are in the fully body of work better players than the so far Treloar career. I’m probably projecting so that my need further consideration.
Interesting excercise.
You’re ofcourse right.I think recentism (apparently that really is a word!!) can be a real issue. I couldn't put the likes of Elliott, Treloar, or even Ball in the team, and leave Graham Wright (a fantastic player) out, for instance. Elliott is an absolute favourite current player, but I (we all) would love to see him string together a few seasons now where he can play a lot of games and show that he belongs in such company.
Mark Williams (who doesn't qualify)? Or do you mean Paul?
If it’s only 1-2 years players like Medhurst and Anthony come into contention. A team of best year vs body of work would make for an interesting comparison.Are you meant to pick players based on their absolute best football played for us in that time, even if it has only lasted for a year or two (that allows the likes of Grundy and Millane to be picked) or should it be on "body of work" (Monkhorst and probably Jolly would be in front of Grundy if it was done on that basis, but Grundy's best is almost certainly miles in front of his rivals)?