Bluemour Melting Pot XXVI

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
As per the Bluemour File OP, this is a thread for discussing Carlton related rumours.
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/bluemour-file.1085141/

Rumour posters should post their rumours in both threads for those that like just to read rumours and for those that like to have get lost in their rumour files.

Remember ... #Bluemour





Continued from here ...


Continued here:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, we are holding up trade week by offering pick for Saad and 43. A very unfair deal to Essendon

On SM-G950F using BigFooty.com mobile app

I guess it was Sydney holding up the Daniher deal last year, GWS holding up the Shiel deal previously too?

Poor Essendon, getting stuck every single year with the difficult party to deal with on the other side. That happens to be different each off season.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Do yourselves a favour, ignore/unfollow/block Browne on Twitter - he has a track record of spouting nonsense, and your time is far more valuable. I'd prefer he wasn't quoted here either, but I understand he's vaguely 'newsworthy' at this time of the year, as a key example of just how poor the AFL 'media' is nowadays.

Browne has made it quite clear he's excited by the prospect of Essendon snaring Dunkley, so that bias frames the tweet nicely.
 
Dodo is in trouble here, needs to use 2 1st rounders over the next 2 years via the draft.

Dogs want future 1sts, meaning 2 for Dunkley or 1 and a player.

Has Fantasia and Saad, wants 2 future 1st for them (doubtful)

This will be fun

They currently hold 3 first round picks - 6,7 & next years.
If they want Dunkley they need to spend one of the 3 and then work from there. Carlton isn't holding anything up. Dodo is playing the media.
If he wants us to give him pick 8 for him to use on Dunkley, not our problem.
 


lmao Dodoro's puppet this trade period is weeping to the masses.

Poor old Tom, the character limits on Twitter has prevented him from naming which clubs, who holds those views or any other sources he’s heard this from. He’s basically given Dodoro a rusty trombone in public.
 
Was thinking to include 30 as well, but that means we have nothing at all in this draft.
Pick 51...
We’re a bit limited this year with the 3 picks we currently hold atm, split and trade for anyone else of value leaves us with a latter pick... unless someone gets traded out which could bring some type of value back...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

its seems pretty clear the * want to keep saad, so they are being deliberately difficult by asking for an unreasonable return.

They seemed pretty keen to pot the guy as soon as he said he wanted to leave, and now they are trying to win him back...
 
They currently hold 3 first round picks - 6,7 & next years.
If they want Dunkley they need to spend one of the 3 and then work from there. Carlton isn't holding anything up. Dodo is playing the media.
If he wants us to give him pick 8 for him to use on Dunkley, not our problem.

They need to trade out before trading in, unless they use a future 1st for Caldwell (with something coming back). If they did that, they still need to take 6 and 7 to the draft, unless they gain another future 1st

Think the Dunkley nomination is premature
 
Damo talking out of his ass
Saad is 100% committed to Carlton, infact his already using the facilities at Princes Park

I personally took Damo’s tweet as him embarrassing * with this tweet. Nothing to do with us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top