Bluemour Season Blast Off Edition XXXIII

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Yes… only 1 player refused a pay cut.

Hmm would love to know more about this.

Assuming channel 7 were right that 6 stars took pay cuts, does that mean we approached 7 and 1 refused?

Interested to know how this came about...approaching only 7 players to take pay cuts. Could this cause divisions in the team?

Williams is probably our most overpaid player but can we really offer him a big contract to join us then ask to take a cut? Probably not.

And yeah the fact we need to in order to fit in Cerra suggests our cap is tight.
 
Hmm would love to know more about this.

Assuming channel 7 were right that 6 stars took pay cuts, does that mean we approached 7 and 1 refused?

Interested to know how this came about...approaching only 7 players to take pay cuts. Could this cause divisions in the team?

Williams is probably our most overpaid player but can we really offer him a big contract to join us then ask to take a cut? Probably not.

And yeah the fact we need to in order to fit in Cerra suggests our cap is tight.
Pretty sure channel 7 said "up to 6 players"
 
And yeah the fact we need to in order to fit in Cerra suggests our cap is tight.

Could be for a whole host of different reasons.

I'm not sure any club (other than Collingwood) would mismanage things to such a degree that they would ask their best players to take a pay cut mid-trade week, because it'll allow them to go after a player.

The fact this isn't on the front page of every news site around the country tells me we're probably reading far more into it than we need to be.
 
The only thing I find strange about 1 refusing is how would B70 know this? I’m not having a go but we haven’t heard any rumours or bits about coaching, players looking in or sps going, (baltolli has said it all year though)
But we know extremely private info like this? I dunno about that one
 
The only thing I find strange about 1 refusing is how would B70 know this? I’m not having a go but we haven’t heard any rumours or bits about coaching, players looking in or sps going, (baltolli has said it all year though)
But we know extremely private info like this? I dunno about that one

6 players, means these players talk to their managers, their coaches, training staff, their friends. Journo's will be all over this.
 
What if the future 1st brings back a future 2nd, 3rd or 4th that has been traded out?
I think you just need to restore balance. I dont know if you could do a traded back 4th round as that pick is worse than the 3rd we are missing, but it would be fine if we brought in a future 3rd or 2nd in the deal.

I think with out list too, the AFL would give us an allowance to deviate from the rules given we have taken multiple 1st round (and high 1st round) picks over the last 5-6 years. They did it for Geelong previously.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

- Austin said we are done.
- Comfy picking from 25
- Want to attack next years draft
- Might look at pick trading though
- Few players futures up in the air as we need to finalise draft hand - so we seem interested in potentially pick trading
- LOB hasn’t been finalised yet

Next years draft will be a crap shoot too.
 
Pretty sure channel 7 said "up to 6 players"

can we assume Cripps pay cut at resigning was 1 and maybe Harry resigned for less on the provision we get Cerra, the.

It might also be year on year the other 4 took a pay cut so that some were backended or front loaded etc without changing the contract amount.

Much too broad a statement to say they took pay cuts without being able to quantify what the actual numbers are.

but I am pumped that the players would be selfless in this way, if they translate that to the field then good things will happen.
 
I’m certain Nick will be looking at at least 1 more trade or perhaps re entering 1st round? We have a serious list review on going and probably 6 to 8 changes still over the next couple of seasons.
 
Could be for a whole host of different reasons.

I'm not sure any club (other than Collingwood) would mismanage things to such a degree that they would ask their best players to take a pay cut mid-trade week, because it'll allow them to go after a player.

The fact this isn't on the front page of every news site around the country tells me we're probably reading far more into it than we need to be.

66 game rebuild and counting ... don't you dare sell ourselves short.
 
Think GWS will be holding onto Tom Green for dear life, very handy player.

Don't want a bar of Cogs now unless GWS are paying half his salary for the rest of his contract, or he's happy to renegotiate down to something in the realm of $600k.

Impey is versatile enough that he could actually be played on a wing, so he might be one to look at. Seems to be racking up the injuries of late though, which would have to be a cause for concern.

Offering a second for Sicily because of his injury would be like a club offering us a second for Charlie for the same reason. Waste of breath.

Trading out a fringe player for one of Mitchell/O'Meara/Wingard would be fine with me, because if gets us that experience boost right away at the cost of a player whose development seems to have stalled a bit, and leaves our early picks intact to replace the young player with someone else next year. I'd try for something like Setterfield and a future second for one of those three mentioned. Hawthorn get a talented young kid to try and rejuvenate, as well as a second rounder to take to the draft or package up to improve their draft position.

TBF, if you take off the blue tinted glasses for a moment, the truth is his value is not that high at all. Charlie's I mean.
 
Human nature is a funny thing - I only care about the bastard that wouldn't take a haircut LOL.

Seven players prob include Harry, Charlie, Williams, Saad, Cripps, Weiters, Martin
as long as Williams is one of them, I'm OK.

I'll say the piker was Saad - literally because I didn't like the way he congratulated Stocker after that goal. Ridiculous, but that's my theory and I'm sticking with it.
Hoping McGovern was 1
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top