por_please_ya
por_kill_ye
Don't worry, I still love you.Hey!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't worry, I still love you.Hey!!
Wouldn’t the fact that Sante is dead mean the manipulation has failed as there isn’t anyone to vote for? Grand Uncle Horace can you confirm that?Your vote is manipulated onto sante - so it’s 3 v 2 v 1 on a voting front at best for you.
If Rob’s killed by an exploding amulet then I took it to mean his vote doesn’t count which is a coin flip, but presumably the amulet exploding isn’t simultaneous with the lynch. If it is, then yeah I guess technically the outcome would ride on a coin flip - I was treating it as though the explosion would precede the lynch though because otherwise why would the vote not be valid? Rob going boom gets you to five.
Nope. Would be the same as my intimidated vote on D1 where I was compelled to vote for a dead dero, or like last night where we went to a coin flip because the manipulated recipient of hotchilli’s vote was MP.Wouldn’t the fact that Sante is dead mean the manipulation has failed as there isn’t anyone to vote for? Grand Uncle Horace can you confirm that?
but that’s an intimidation and not a manipulation to me they are different. One you have to follow the rule or be MK’d no matter what the other is dependent on an alive players.Nope. Would be the same as my intimidated vote on D1 where I was compelled to vote for a dead dero, or like last night where we went to a coin flip because the manipulated recipient of hotchilli’s vote was MP.
That’s how we ended up at 4-4 and a coin flip rather than 5-4 and a straightforward lynch.
The point remains though that the target is still available to have their vote taken. There’s nothing to suggest in the role that there has to be a valid destination for it, in the same way that you can’t predict concurrent actions when submitting an intimidation.but that’s an intimidation and not a manipulation to me they are different. One you have to follow the rule or be MK’d no matter what the other is dependent on an alive players.
Other games have seen manipulations fail due to target/s dying in either end of the manipulation either the vote giver or vote taker.The point remains though that the target is still available to have their vote taken. There’s nothing to suggest in the role that there has to be a valid destination for it, in the same way that you can’t predict concurrent actions when submitting an intimidation.
Wouldn’t the fact that Sante is dead mean the manipulation has failed as there isn’t anyone to vote for? Grand Uncle Horace can you confirm that?
I’m interested in what games you’re referring to because I’ve only ever seen it where the vote giver is killed, which is common sense because there’s then no vote to be given.Other games have seen manipulations fail due to target/s dying in either end of the manipulation either the vote giver or vote taker.
Then we call the game here then.tarks interpretation is correct.
This is of course a theoretical debate as I am neither confirming nor denying the wolves in this instance manipulated the vote of any person.
Hahahaha that's classic.On that, you would not believe how frustrated I was that you wouldn’t consider switching to crowy yesterday because hotchilli wasn’t around to change his vote por_please_ya when I knew full well that it didn’t matter what he did with it.
I’d like to find them but how many games have we played? I’m not searching through with no real idea of where I am looking.I’m interested in what games you’re referring to because I’ve only ever seen it where the vote giver is killed, which is common sense because there’s then no vote to be given.
Porps, the village losing to the SK is worse than the village losing to a faction. It is more of a black mark for flogs to lead the village to defeat by the SK.Tarkyn because he's a wolfy campaigner who hoodwinked us all Grand Uncle Horace
hotchilli get in here
We were pretty clear behaviourally that eth dog wasn’t the SK during yesterday’s day phase and that it was between sante and crowy, but by the time we even discussed trying to turn the boat around it was too late in the phase. Plus we had the added inconvenience of losing crowy’s vote on eth dog if we moved to sante.Hahahaha that's classic.
I was actually thinking you or sante were SK at that point. And then it hit me later, esp when I saw the votes laid out. But I still thought sante might be.
How about you adopt some role fluidity and become a second SK and vote porps out?Porps, the village losing to the SK is worse than the village losing to a faction. It is more of a black mark for flogs to lead the village to defeat by the SK.
Go ROLE FLUID, Flip to croweater 41 and become a wolf!
Actually this does sound funHow about you adopt some role fluidity and become a second SK and vote porps out?
This is fun Grand Uncle Horace
Actually this does sound fun