mickeyjuice
Cancelled
how are asada going to ban players when Dank's record keeping was non-existant
Ah, this ignorant POV again. Yay.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
how are asada going to ban players when Dank's record keeping was non-existant
Ah, this ignorant POV again. Yay.
All the Bombers supporters I talk to feel victimised and reckon all the other clubs are jealous.THIS!!!!!!!!!
Sorry to cut your quote short, it's not because I didn't read or think you're right, but I didn't want to requote the whole post.If everything that was written in the charges report was factual then this penalty of only a 12 month suspension for Hird is a joke. Hird should be kicked out of the game for good for his level of involvement in this and how much he knew about what was going on.... where's the player welfare ffs?! Draft picks should be taken as well as points and it damn well should stretch into 2014 and possibly beyond otherwise it's far too lenient and almost makes it worth the risk if the AFL are this easy to push around and make "deals" with.
...
It's time to put a massive detour sign up and block this path for the good of the game.
/rant
If the players get banned he will never coach again.If Hird gets a year and players get two, then that's just wrong.
And Essendon showed they can't be trusted with the health of young men. When the mother of one of them is that angry would anyone want their sons drafted by them?For those thinking Adelaide got gipped compared with Essendon you need to remember that the Crows received draft penalties because they tampered with the draft. It was an eye for an eye.
Essendon's penalties are completely different and can't be compared.
They have consent forms. They can ban the whole team.how are asada going to ban players when Dank's record keeping was non-existant? what players do they place a ban on and what players do they not place a ban on? watch them get away with it because of that....the penalty must surely be on the club not the players. Watson is the only one who has admitted to it
If the penalties being mooted here are accurate it's an absolute joke. It's essentially a one match ban. They were most likely going to get absolutely smashed in week 1, then Thompson (who's a better coach than Hird) coaches for a year plus a fine that will hardly cripple such a big club. Hird should be gone for life. Enough with the "we aren't drug cheats"...why is the AFL giving ground on this?
So that the truth doesn't get out.
no ******* way will that happen
if that happens, many people will just walk away from the game. way too soft
Hird's Supreme Court action would have to be pulled for that to happen. If I was the AFL I would tell them to get flicked; they had there chance to play ball the AFL way and chose not to. Let them see what happens when you pull away from suckling the protective teat of the AFL.
i believe ACC is investigating whether or not fraud occurred due to essendon questioning the numbers on the invoice
so people like dank will be given two options:
1) the numbers on the invoice are correct and were administered to the players, OR
2) fraud occurred, which means jail time.
Hird has gone rogue.
Image if hird with charter and dank told all, how many clubs have those two been tied to. The fallout would be devastating. Hird will withdraw his action, they're taking the weekend to talk him round. He's narcissism is what got to this point and makes him to unpredictable in a court setting, needs to be neutralised.
Sorry to cut your quote short, it's not because I didn't read or think you're right, but I didn't want to requote the whole post.
You are absolutely right that when this is proven, Hird needs to be hit VERY hard for his involvement, however we need to remember that these are strictly for the bringing the game into disrepute charges. I don't believe it is the AFL's job to immediately hit the individuals or clubs with bans relating to the actual drug use or administration. The ASADA process still needs to be completed, and official infractions issued before that happens, and as long as the club is being punished for the poor governance to keep the finals clean for now, that is good enough for me.
Remember, that officials of the club are also covered under the Anti Doping Code, and his involvement will be considered when it comes to the administration and setup of the program, and once the official notices are issued for this, then is the time to hit the hardest.
Is this just stage 1 to make sure Essendon don't play finals and don't get draft picks? Perhaps Little has been told play ball now and when the big penalties come we (AFL) will try to make sure Essendon survive. Don't play ball now and we will simply follow ASADA recommendations at Stage 2.
Great Post !
Personally , i have always had suspicions over the rapid body shape change of the Geelong players at the start of their reign .
AN
ANZAC day game was a Bombers home match this year so should be Collingwood home game next year. NO fuss for me if they let Essendon play next year but not if they give the Bombers this revenue spinner. Would rather play Richmond anyway.
Would take this to another level if Hird or Dank got 'knocked', makes you wonder how deep this Charters character runs.Hird has gone rogue.
Image if hird with charter and dank told all, how many clubs have those two been tied to. The fallout would be devastating. Hird will withdraw his action, they're taking the weekend to talk him round. He's narcissism is what got to this point and makes him to unpredictable in a court setting, needs to be neutralised.