Apart from Hille and McVeigh and possibly Lovett, it remains to be seen whether the rest of that mid aged group named above are any better than average.
Ah right, so now we move from there not being any or enuogh, to a lack of quality.
And why do they have to be better than average?
If we have three that are better than average (although Watson and Davey are better than that) and the rest are stock standard, average footballers doesn't that provide a balance?
You don't have to be a star to be able to perform your role, ala Welsh, McPhee, NLM (or in familiar terms O'Bree, Lockyer, Maxwell).
I expect another answered series of questions, it has been quite a trend in this thread.