Brad Green

Remove this Banner Ad

whelan=legend said:
Haha. You just proved my point. Every team needs their time at the bottom and you guys have timed your run at the WORST time possible. I honestly do feel for you guys, you will be down the bottom of the ladder with the absence of draft picks (kind of like what happened to Carlton) which will just prolong the situation. Not sure if your club will be able to survive it, but good luck.
Click to expand...

Pot. Kettle. Black.
If you want to start that arguement we can go on about MFC having no money, no home and no supporters.
While you might have some decent young talent is doesn't always relate to future success (just check St.Kilda & Richmond over the years with their high draft picks) it comes down to how well their managed, coached and to an extent, the stability of the club.
 
Teak_Pies said:
are you kidding???
Click to expand...

haha nahh mate

just find it ridiculous how you sit back have a look at other posters and go "yeah shit list"

post something worth reading

unless you want to back up your arguement on why we have "the worst list"?

please explain
 

Log in to remove this ad.

DaVe86 said:
I still have no idea what Collingwood would be offering.

It is definitely not pick 11.

So Pick 29 has to come up with another player.

Given Melbourne's forward line worries...perhaps Rusling is in the deal?


Cant see 29 + Shaw getting the deal across. Dee's would be looking for younger players...and i reckon Simon Buckley is a similar type player with a big future.
Click to expand...

Yeah i think pick 29 & Rusling would get the deal done. Not that it's worth much, but maybe melbourne's pick 51 as well

Don't bother suggesting Shaw, more to do with him being to old, we wouldn't even consider a player of that level over about 24.
 
I haven't read much of this thread, but let me guess that it degenerated into:

1. Melbourne people asking far too much for Green.

2. Other posters being "original" and saying how rubbish we are and how we won't be around as a club much longer.

3. People offering rubbish trades for Green that would never get done.

Either have something decent to say instead of acting like a 7 year old child out in the playground, or post somewhere else.
 
McLean_4_Captain said:
Yeah i think pick 29 & Rusling would get the deal done. Not that it's worth much, but maybe melbourne's pick 51 as well

Don't bother suggesting Shaw, more to do with him being to old, we wouldn't even consider a player of that level over about 24.
Click to expand...

No thanks. If that's what we have to trade then I'd rather keep Rusling and pick up an 18 midfielder.
 
Sean Rusling???
Is this the same Sean Rusling that has played 8 minutes in 3 years. He has the worst shoulders in the history of the game.
No thanks Collingwood, you can keep that list-clogger & Rhyce Shaw. I love watching him streak away from half back then f*ck the bounce & lose his feet.
 
maxfactor33 said:
Pot. Kettle. Black.
If you want to start that arguement we can go on about MFC having no money
Click to expand...
Seriously? I thought no money would mean we were bankrupt, meaning we would no longer exist?
maxfactor33 said:
, no home and
Click to expand...
What is casey feilds?
maxfactor33 said:
no supporters.
Click to expand...
Did our 30,000 members just disappear? Shit the club must be in real trouble now!

The fact is we are now at rock bottom and we wont EVER fold. Never, ever.
 
whelan=legend said:
Seriously? I thought no money would mean we were bankrupt, meaning we would no longer exist?

What is casey feilds?

Did our 30,000 members just disappear? Shit the club must be in real trouble now!

The fact is we are now at rock bottom and we wont EVER fold. Never, ever.
Click to expand...

I think so. I certainly didn't see any of them at the football this season?
 
saj_21 said:
McLean, Bruce, MacDonald, and Miller may not be the best payers in the AFL but they are good leaders, better than collingwoods stocks.
Click to expand...


Such a ridiculous statement. How do you know what kind of leaders anybody are? How can you measure it if you're not a part of the inner sanctum of either club?
 
CowboyFromHell said:
I haven't read much of this thread, but let me guess that it degenerated into:

1. Melbourne people asking far too much for Green.

2. Other posters being "original" and saying how rubbish we are and how we won't be around as a club much longer.

3. People offering rubbish trades for Green that would never get done.

Either have something decent to say instead of acting like a 7 year old child out in the playground, or post somewhere else.
Click to expand...

Yeah it is its preety ****ing pathetic by both supporters

Just the same old bagging of each other clubs
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Well I haven't read much of the thread either. Nevertheless, he would be a great pick-up for Carlton but pick 6 is definitely off limits. There are certainly names that have been mentioned as trade bait for Carlton, so there could be 1 or 2 of those names thrown up and perhaps pick 24.
 
thegreenmachine said:
Well I haven't read much of the thread either. Nevertheless, he would be a great pick-up for Carlton but pick 6 is definitely off limits. There are certainly names that have been mentioned as trade bait for Carlton, so there could be 1 or 2 of those names thrown up and perhaps pick 24.
Click to expand...

Is Walker worth too much to go with Pick 24 if you missed out on Warnock? No real idea how much he is rated down at Carlton. Not sure if we would really want anyone else from your list.
 
CowboyFromHell said:
Is Walker worth too much to go with Pick 24 if you missed out on Warnock? No real idea how much he is rated down at Carlton. Not sure if we would really want anyone else from your list.
Click to expand...
I think you will find the answer will be a big no to that idea from the majority of Carlton supporters, myself included. Don't rule out the possibility though that this scenario will be in the papers in the next few days.
 
Swans would be better off holding on to pick 16 and bringing in some young talent.

Their window is closing. Green would be best moving to a side that's window is opening.
 
Bloods said:
I rate Green but I reckon we're the losers there.
Click to expand...

I would agree. Would be surprised if Sydney didn't end up with at least a 4th rounder (likely 3rd rounder) from us in that deal. While I'd like to keep Brad, if we managed to pull off the deal just for Green I'd be happy.
 
whelan=legend said:
Channel 10:

ROK to Hawks
Green to Sydney
Pick 16 to Melb
Click to expand...

I'd be happy with that. Swan fans may not like it but Green would be a very handy player for the next 5-6 years. Has improved alot in the last 3 years as a player.

IMO that could see us part with Pick 19 for Warnock IF that deal went through.
 
CowboyFromHell said:
I'd be happy with that. Swan fans may not like it but Green would be a very handy player for the next 5-6 years. Has improved alot in the last 3 years as a player.

IMO that could see us part with Pick 19 for Warnock IF that deal went through.
Click to expand...

Instantly. However, like all trade rumours, it could well be a box of shit.
 
CowboyFromHell said:
I'd be happy with that. Swan fans may not like it but Green would be a very handy player for the next 5-6 years. Has improved alot in the last 3 years as a player.
Click to expand...

Green is 28 by the start of next season.

Effectively we replace one 28yo with another (lesser) player of the same age and pay him the same we offered ROK.

Doesn't really sound like a win does it?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Brad Green

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top