Traded Brad Hill [traded with future 3rd to St Kilda for Acres, #10, #58, future 2nd and 4th]

Who won this trade?

  • Fremantle

    Votes: 5 100.0%
  • St Kilda

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5

Remove this Banner Ad

Agreed that's why we missed out on Hogan and Lobb last year.

Just quietly, I don't think missing out on Hogan would have been a bad thing.
 
I am not sure we would accept it either to be honest. Just putting it out there. This basis, if St Kilda choose to split pick 6 does Hill stay with us next year?
I doubt the Saints split the pick unless they know they can still get the deal done.

Doesn't seem enough for me.

Depending where Port may think Dylan Stephens goes in the draft they may look at trading 10 up to 6?
 
Geez you are going to sell the farm to get Kelly then !!
Not really.

I'd rate Hill's value to WC as equal to that of Kelly. Sure, WC could use some more contested grunt, but with Rioli gone outside pace and footskills are just as necessary. Onball and wing are the sides weakest areas, which is why I wish WC would consider having a crack at Smith.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I have to say, this thread is a lot more cordial than the Tim Kelly thread. Plenty of salt getting tossed around over there!!

Saints fans, some talk on the TK thread about WCE trading picks 14 & 24 for your pick 6. I imagine you could then use 14 (+ something, Acres?) for Hill and 24 for maybe Jones. Does this seem a palatable option for you guys?

Cheers!

It's revolting for us
 
The Lachie Neale trade was very fair. If anything it was a good deal for Brisbane.

There's a difference between a clubs giving up more than what was first offered and what they feel comfortable with.

We won't see another deal like we did with the desperate Suns. Even the Suns won't do anything like that again.

The threat isn't real. A deal will get done.
your team is offering $900,000 a year for 6 years for Brad Hill. 6 YEARS!
 
For what it's worth I agree. So we all agree if St Kilda decides to split the picks Hill stays? Unless they can work something 2020 in?

Yes and you'd think that was clear to both Hill and St Kilda.

My preference is to keep Hill for the rest of his career which makes things easy
 
I don't understand your point here mate

I guess it shows that the club are very keen to recruit him, the offer is excellent.

If however the pick got split and then the Saints appeared to be low balling Fremantle would that sit ok with Hill?

Maybe he wouldn't care but i'm assuming he's pretty keen to get that coin for the next 6 years and his Mrs is super keen on being back in Melbourne so he wont want St Kilda playing silly buggers.
 
I guess it shows that the club are very keen to recruit him, the offer is excellent.

If however the pick got split and then the Saints appeared to be low balling Fremantle would that sit ok with Hill?

Maybe he wouldn't care but i'm assuming he's pretty keen to get that coin for the next 6 years and his Mrs is super keen on being back in Melbourne so he wont want St Kilda playing silly buggers.
None of that has anything to do with the post he quote me on though

I'm not suggesting the Saints will low ball Freo at all.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I have to say, this thread is a lot more cordial than the Tim Kelly thread. Plenty of salt getting tossed around over there!!

Saints fans, some talk on the TK thread about WCE trading picks 14 & 24 for your pick 6. I imagine you could then use 14 (+ something, Acres?) for Hill and 24 for maybe Jones. Does this seem a palatable option for you guys?

Cheers!

Yes it does.
 
Some of the melts on either side are going to be epic once this trade finally gets done.

You know I really don’t think there will be.

I think we’re all expecting the deal to get done and the price is going to be somewhere in the vicinity of 6.

If they got him for a downgraded say 10 ...I’d be pissed off for an hour and then look at who we were getting and say well played Saints.

If we got 6 and say Bruce compo ...I’d be ecstatic and St K fans pissed off for an hour and then rejoice in getting Hill.

The Tim Kelly thread is where pistols will be drawn.
 
You know I really don’t think there will be.

I think we’re all expecting the deal to get done and the price is going to be somewhere in the vicinity of 6.

If they got him for a downgraded say 10 ...I’d be pi**ed off for an hour and then look at who we were getting and say well played Saints.

If we got 6 and say Bruce compo ...I’d be ecstatic and St K fans pi**ed off for an hour and then rejoice in getting Hill.

The Tim Kelly thread is where pistols will be drawn.
If we trade Bruce and 6 for Hill I'll be angry for at least 2 hours I reckon
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Traded Brad Hill [traded with future 3rd to St Kilda for Acres, #10, #58, future 2nd and 4th]

Back
Top