- Jan 7, 2010
- 12,617
- 37,160
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Strikers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Win/win trade for both clubs...
Win/win trade for both clubs.
Wish Lids all the best.
Gave us a lot for someone who grew up as a Carlton supporter.
Good foresight by Dimma to suggest GWS, knowing full well they had more to offer us.
yeah a masterstroke of genius, I mean no one in their right mind would ever have thought that GWS has more to offer us..
yeah a masterstroke of genius, I mean no one in their right mind would ever have thought that GWS has more to offer us..
The article missed the bit where Deledio approached Geelong while the 2016 season was still live, asking to be traded in, as confirmed by both Stephen Wells and Dan Richardson. That happened before Deledio went on radio to say that trade talk "was just noise", so I conclude that "Our Lids" was bullshitting us all for months.
The Age also reported that Deledio cleaned out his locker before the Geelong trade evaporated, but who knows if that is true or not.
I don't know what happened "inside our four walls", but I don't believe for a second that it involved everyone working harmoniously together for a win / win, as suggested.
Lol. That's hilarious.First time I've seen him in GWS' colours and I've gotta say that he looks like a winner.
First time I've seen him in GWS' colours and I've gotta say that he looks like a winner.
Nailed it.The thing about the Lids trade that stands out like dog's balls - we're paying part of his contract to play for GWS! WTF?! Rationalise it all you like, but we're paying for the most accomplished and skilled player to play in our colours in the last ten years to play for another club. That is a fail. Who is at fault here? Lids or the club?
PS. If you've followed my posts, you know I love Lids. Trading Lids is one thing, trading Lids and paying part of his contract makes no sense unless there is a real problem here and the trade is the solution.
The thing about the Lids trade that stands out like dog's balls - we're paying part of his contract to play for GWS! WTF?! Rationalise it all you like, but we're paying for the most accomplished and skilled player to play in our colours in the last ten years to play for another club. That is a fail. Who is at fault here? Lids or the club?
PS. If you've followed my posts, you know I love Lids. Trading Lids is one thing. Trading Lids and paying part of his contract makes no sense unless there is a real problem here and the trade is the solution.
Just what I've read in the link...GWS are paying $500,000 a year and RFC are making up the difference.How much are we paying?
Actually it makes perfect sense. No team is going to give a first rounder for an injury prone 29 year old other then gws. GWS have cap issues if we didn't pay some of his salary we say goodbye to that 1st rounderThe thing about the Lids trade that stands out like dog's balls - we're paying part of his contract to play for GWS! WTF?! Rationalise it all you like, but we're paying for the most accomplished and skilled player to play in our colours in the last ten years to play for another club. That is a fail. Who is at fault here? Lids or the club?
PS. If you've followed my posts, you know I love Lids. Trading Lids is one thing. Trading Lids and paying part of his contract makes no sense unless there is a real problem here and the trade is the solution.