Toast #BringBackTheBars - Our Heritage, Our History, Our Right! Part 1

Assuming there were no obstacles, would you prefer the PB/Pylon guernsey to be our home colours?


  • Total voters
    531

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Last year the AFL approved them so we wore them and we could sell them.

This year the club has had a whole lot made up. The AFL can't stop us getting Macron to manufacture 46 or 92 of them for internal use. It's a bit like the AFL saying you can't make a cupboard box.

But they can stop us wearing them and then selling them under the licensing agreement. I suspect the 46 or 92 jumpers will have to be put in storage or be scrapped. Probably cant even given them away.
How is it that the AFL seemingly own the PB/WP guernsey anyway? Did they pay to acquire it?

I assume it belonged to either the SANFL or the PAMFC est 1996 as part of the separate entity rubbish eliminated under One Club?

If the AFL don't own it how do they prohibit us selling it or do they prohibit the sale of any non AFL licensed merchandise by AFL clubs?

Frankly I have a mind to start an AFC Wimbledon type breakaway club and line up some merchandise to sell that looks a lot like the guernsey in question.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

How is it that the AFL seemingly own the PB/WP guernsey anyway? Did they pay to acquire it?

I assume it belonged to either the SANFL or the PAMFC est 1996 as part of the separate entity rubbish eliminated under One Club?

If the AFL don't own it how do they prohibit us selling it or do they prohibit the sale of any non AFL licensed merchandise by AFL clubs?

Frankly I have a mind to start an AFC Wimbledon type breakaway club and line up some merchandise to sell that looks a lot like the guernsey in question.

When we signed our original licence agreement one of the terms would have been the surrender of our intellectual property to the AFL. Whether the PB/WP guernsey was included in this surrender, I'm not sure. If it was not surrendered, the AFL hold the IP rights to the new logo and can decide not to licence any merchandise containing same of which it does not approve. If we started selling non-licenced merchandise they would come down on us like a ton of bricks.
 
This only highlights how childish the Collingwood FC and it's former president really are. What we do in games not associated with them is none of their business. The PB guernsey is none of their business. Deals we try to achieve with the AFL are none of their business. They are only another 'co-worker' in the AFL business. Yet they cry like a kiddie in a kindergarten to get their own way
 
When we signed our original licence agreement one of the terms would have been the surrender of our intellectual property to the AFL. Whether the PB/WP guernsey was included in this surrender, I'm not sure. If it was not surrendered, the AFL hold the IP rights to the new logo and can decide not to licence any merchandise containing same of which it does not approve. If we started selling non-licenced merchandise they would come down on us like a ton of bricks.
We already have done this though. There were woollen and lace up pbs in the Port store last year not in anyway connected to AFL merch.
 
If the AFL says no, then it has to add to the fuel on the fire to win the flag and then all the players change in to it for the medals and cup. Such a FU to the AFL would be the stuff of dreams
If we make the GF and are a fair way ahead at 3/4 time, you'd put in on then. No way the AFL lets their showpiece not go to the team that wins. After a win, we can happily take any penalty.
 
How is it that the AFL seemingly own the PB/WP guernsey anyway? Did they pay to acquire it?

I assume it belonged to either the SANFL or the PAMFC est 1996 as part of the separate entity rubbish eliminated under One Club?

If the AFL don't own it how do they prohibit us selling it or do they prohibit the sale of any non AFL licensed merchandise by AFL clubs?

Frankly I have a mind to start an AFC Wimbledon type breakaway club and line up some merchandise to sell that looks a lot like the guernsey in question.

I doubt they control the Prison Bars per se but they would control what items can be made using their registered trademarks (i.e. their logo, and ours incidentally).

I’m pretty sure we are still able to produce “cleanskin” versions though, such as the Fibre of Football woollen guernsey and the logo-less lace-up made by JAX.
 
And what about the second time? And the third?
Second and third what?
They need to punish us for the first wearing and we show it was excessive and caused unnecessary harm and will continue to do so.
Second and third are then fine.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yeah it was these ones I mentioned us selling last year a few posts ago
I doubt they control the Prison Bars per se but they would control what items can be made using their registered trademarks (i.e. their logo, and ours incidentally).

I’m pretty sure we are still able to produce “cleanskin” versions though, such as the Fibre of Football woollen guernsey and the logo-less lace-up made by JAX.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top