Re: Bruce quits club
I'm kind of split down the middle with this one. Bruce, although copping the wrath from most of us all year, still managed to finish just outside the top 5 in our B&F. I feel his professional manner will be sorely missed, especially since our skipper is gone as well.
I congratulate the club in a way, for not caving into a 31 year old's demands. All players who are out of contract and over 30, should only be offered 1 year contracts! Plus, like Biff states, Bailey could not promise Bruce a spot in our side, and i think this, over the money offered, was the decision why Bruce left. Even though, i feel Bruce still has 2 years left in him, he has become slow and vulnerable. With Strauss, Blease, Gysberts and Tapscott looking for gametime, It might be a blessing in disguise. Although, it does mean Grimes will be anchored in defense now. Time for Strauss to step up and take Bruce's spot in the team...
Cormades.
When Brock announced he was going to leave, it really shock me up - and I was not Robinson Crusoe. And at the same time, Davey was out of contract and making noises. But then the old hard-drive light started to flicker and I thought to myself (as did others): how much of a loss is Brock really? You know the rest.
With me at least, I am not at all bothered by Bruce's decision to leave. From what we are now hearing, it was more to do with not being guaranteed a place in the XXII rather than the coin (and he has made enough of that over the years). If so, any club that is prepared to offer that sort of guarantee to a 31 year old who is not overly blessed with skills is actually asking their current coach to don the Shirt of Nessus, much like Terry Wallace and Kent Kingsley at Richmond (KK cost the Tigers little, but that meant bugger all to the Richmond ferals).
I would not be surprised if he was not picked up per se. Dammit he is 31 and no champion,
If this decision evokes any sort of reaction from me it is one of bewilderment: how can one guy be so dumb?
Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain.
I'm kind of split down the middle with this one. Bruce, although copping the wrath from most of us all year, still managed to finish just outside the top 5 in our B&F. I feel his professional manner will be sorely missed, especially since our skipper is gone as well.
I congratulate the club in a way, for not caving into a 31 year old's demands. All players who are out of contract and over 30, should only be offered 1 year contracts! Plus, like Biff states, Bailey could not promise Bruce a spot in our side, and i think this, over the money offered, was the decision why Bruce left. Even though, i feel Bruce still has 2 years left in him, he has become slow and vulnerable. With Strauss, Blease, Gysberts and Tapscott looking for gametime, It might be a blessing in disguise. Although, it does mean Grimes will be anchored in defense now. Time for Strauss to step up and take Bruce's spot in the team...