- Aug 18, 2018
- 32,329
- 55,060
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Then they would be more predictable and are probably don't get shocked in the first.And what if Rozee, and Soldo played tonight?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then they would be more predictable and are probably don't get shocked in the first.And what if Rozee, and Soldo played tonight?
No, the rule is clear on advantage. The team shows an intent to take it and the play is continuous then advantage is called. Too many people, including Chanel 7 commentators, do not know the rules!Only caught the second half of this one so I have rose coloured glasses on.
It wasn't our night and Port threw everything at it. Well done to them. A completely different team (even 2nd half) to what I saw briefly last week v Adelaide.
Positive performances by Zach Guthrie and Kolo down back. Stengle continues to be our only forward in decent form. Glad to see Mullin back in the side too and doing an important job for the team.
Overall though we have too many players not at their best right now. I'm hopeful it can turn around.
Biggest negative from this game was the failure to assess Cameron after the head knock. Some things are bigger than winning a game of football. I thought our club would be better than that.
Also, while it sucks, the no advantage call was fair enough. The ump blew the whistle when he saw where the kick went and once he makes that call it has to come back.
Why not both? Conway and blitz is the immediate futureConway doesn't have the fitness.
Blitz is the only path
Then you drop a midfielder and we lose ground level opportunities. Plus Conway can only play a half at best.Why not both? Conway and blitz is the immediate future
Blitz plays as a mid in the ruck anyway but see your pointThen you drop a midfielder and we lose ground level opportunities. Plus Conway can only play a half at best.
Play him in games we'll win anyway but that's it
One of his better games. He was worse earlier in the year. His inability to kill marking contests is a worry. RatugoleaI'm out of patience with SDK.
Horrible effort, played some of the worst football I've ever seen and only lose by 6 points. Talk about pissing away what should have been a regulation win.
It's why it was important to bank the early wins because performances like this will be inevitable but it is hard for me to accept how poor that first half was and how different we were in the second half. Just don't get it.
Wines plays 100x better when one of the big 3 miss, rather than being a plodder on a wing. So they felt little difference. Their stand in ruckman was good.And what if Rozee, and Soldo played tonight?
The tongue is a bit in cheek with my previous comment. But the main point is that our intercepting backline doesn't work if our midfield doesn't apply enough pressure to the opposition entries to make them bomb it.
If our midfield is going to continue to suck then we need to find a different backline that works best at ground level
Maybe, but feels also like a well oiled machine being fed the wrong parts. If you can't change the parts going in, do you need to change the machine?Tinker with the backline yeah, but don't fix won't aint broke. Our midfield is busted.
The liberal interpretation of throws is probably shortening my over all lifespanI feel like the new umpiring rules are hurting geelong as well around the refusal to pay holding the ball.
We clearly are a side that has focused on turnovers and slingshotting, so when the umpires decide to refuse to pay htb out of the blue after a few months and your strategy is around turnovers… it is frustrating and hurts you
Or just picked Grundy up in the 2012 draft when he came up at pick 17, instead of drafting ruck failures like Orren Stephenson and Hamish McIntosh. haven't had a decent ruck since Ottens.I'd say we've never been successful in recruiting an A grade ruckman, as opposed to never gone after one
We tried to get Goldstein in his prime more than once and tried to get in the race for Grundy when it was clear he was done at Collingwood.
Yeah he plays as a mid, but he's our best ruck option currently.Blitz plays as a mid in the ruck anyway but see your point
Their midfield was already 10/10, I don’t know if replacing x with y regardless of how good would have made any difference for them.And what if Rozee, and Soldo played tonight?
It’s mind boggling with the rules of not being allowed to dump players that they are not paying htb… so what do players do then??The liberal interpretation of throws is probably shortening my over all lifespan
Having a couple out probably balanced then out to be fairWines plays 100x better when one of the big 3 miss, rather than being a plodder on a wing. So they felt little difference. Their stand in ruckman was good.
Yeah.Without doubt the Jeremy Cameron non goal was an incorrect decision. Chris Scott went into the presser knowing the rules and made it known..
That hasn't been the rule for ten years I recon.Also, while it sucks, the no advantage call was fair enough. The ump blew the whistle when he saw where the kick went and once he makes that call it has to come back.
Yeah there's something in this. Way too many ball ups, which sux when you aren't a good rucking and clearance team.I feel like the new umpiring rules are hurting geelong as well around the refusal to pay holding the ball.
We clearly are a side that has focused on turnovers and slingshotting, so when the umpires decide to refuse to pay htb out of the blue after a few months and your strategy is around turnovers… it is frustrating and hurts you.
We thought Mannagh would come in to offer a bit of dash and evasiveness a bit further up the ground didn't we?
It makes sense to me... He has those attributes.
But for some reason unknown to me, we are playing him as an inside 50, forward pocket in the VFL.
I don't get it.
I'd be happy to see both Managh + Mullin pushing midfield minutes in the VFL and then AFL if shown good enough.