Can you guys answer one simple question for me ? Where is your list at ? Are you rebuilding or trying to contend
Rebuilding obviously... after many a failed rebuilds though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you guys answer one simple question for me ? Where is your list at ? Are you rebuilding or trying to contend
Can you guys answer one simple question for me ? Where is your list at ? Are you rebuilding or trying to contend
Rebuilding.Can you guys answer one simple question for me ? Where is your list at ? Are you rebuilding or trying to contend
thank you, it just seems odd with the offseason moves that you would be rebuildingRebuilding obviously... after many a failed rebuilds though
Yeah and luckily our recruiter makes the decisions lol so yes we are all laughing, the Jack crisp threads are the most popular on our own boards
thank you, it just seems odd with the offseason moves that you would be rebuilding
Well I know mayes, taylor and cutler. I don't rate Aish but I know he is highly rated. Who else do you guys have ?I knew you guys would like him. Truth is most Pies supporters dont know much about the quality of players on interstate teams list because they are so Vic footy centric. Like you who just said the lions dont have much young talent apart from Mayes
Well I know mayes, taylor and cutler. I don't rate Aish but I know he is highly rated. Who else do you guys have ?
Paine!Well I know mayes, taylor and cutler. I don't rate Aish but I know he is highly rated. Who else do you guys have ?
2-8 you're flying, but alas that was more aimed at the judd trade which I think backfired big time for carlton
Also, they have not been included in the comparison. They only compared "15 of the most high-profile players to switch clubs last year" which does seem to be a little unfair from a Collingwood POV considering Crisp would probably make the top 5 if he was included on that list.
I don't get why you have to twist the words of people you don't like ? To garner likes ? Try and make a point that otherwise wouldn't be relevant ? Not quite sureLol. I can't name any players on the Manchester City squad, so I can logically assume they are crap and don't have any.
We know your real intentions.I don't get why you have to twist the words of people you don't like ? To garner likes ? Try and make a point that otherwise wouldn't be relevant ? Not quite sure
I like Dayne BeamsWe know your real intentions.
That "Beams recruit of the year" article may be the most effective burley I've ever seen. Has brought a lot of fish to the surface.
Value.
I like Dayne Beams
thank you, it just seems odd with the offseason moves that you would be rebuilding
Definitely trying to contend this year.Can you guys answer one simple question for me ? Where is your list at ? Are you rebuilding or trying to contend
It's about as useful as deliberately leaving players out of a comparison because they weren't high profile enough... I don't actually expect them to write an article on the low profile players, just like I didn't expect them to leave those players out of a comparison. Isn't it good that lower profile players like Crisp have performed so well? I know I'd like to see how they rate in comparison to the higher profile guys.Yes, we'll then congratulate you on getting the best no name player, who is still not ranked anywhere near the best players in the league.
What's the point of this? If there was an article on the best blue buttons in a bucket, would you claim that to be unfair to your red button, just because it's a fairly decent button?
At the time I thought you guys had absolutely shafted us in the Beams deal. He was my favorite player and I never expected Crisp to get anywhere near favorite player status. He's already my favorite player though so I'm not so sure I agree with you about you guys winning the trade. Crisp was meant to be the steak knives, people were saying he was of equal value to about a 3rd round pick. He looks more like being equivalent to a 1st round pick now and at this stage is probably worth more than the guy we were asking for (Aish). I dare say if we got Aish it would've only been pick 5 + Aish too, so in hindsight we are lucky you guys weren't willing to part with him last year.The article was about 15 of the biggest names to switch clubs. And even then, if you included Crisp, Brisbane/Beams is the winner. At the end of the day, it all means very little. Collingwood is still further up the ladder, and Brisbane still have Beams (and the 2002 & 2003 Premierships).
It's great that Crisp has done well. But he's left out of comparisons, because that's not what the article was about. It was about 15 big name players.Crisp wasn't one of those 15, so any comparison is moot.It's about as useful as deliberately leaving players out of a comparison because they weren't high profile enough... I don't actually expect them to write an article on the low profile players, just like I didn't expect them to leave those players out of a comparison. Isn't it good that lower profile players like Crisp have performed so well? I know I'd like to see how they rate in comparison to the higher profile guys.
.
I wasn't talking about winning the trade (as a whole), just pointing out that Beams is by far a better/more valuable player than Crisp. Again, if you wanted Crisp factored into comparisons, he still won't present as a better 'get' than Beams. No-one was happy to see the back of Crisp, and we'd have him back in a flash, but we would take Beams first any day.At the time I thought you guys had absolutely shafted us in the Beams deal. He was my favorite player and I never expected Crisp to get anywhere near favorite player status. He's already my favorite player though so I'm not so sure I agree with you about you guys winning the trade. Crisp was meant to be the steak knives, people were saying he was of equal value to about a 3rd round pick. He looks more like being equivalent to a 1st round pick now and at this stage is probably worth more than the guy we were asking for (Aish). I dare say if we got Aish it would've only been pick 5 + Aish too, so in hindsight we are lucky you guys weren't willing to part with him last year.
Exactly, that's my point. The statistics themselves were about the 15 high profile players, but the person who wrote the article decided to take that data and declare Brisbane winners of bragging rights even though no comparison was done.It's great that Crisp has done well. But he's left out of comparisons, because that's not what the article was about. It was about 15 big name players.Crisp wasn't one of those 15, so any comparison is moot.
Yeah, fair enough he is a better player at the moment and probably always will be. With Crisp still only being 21, his potential has me very excited though, I can only dream.I wasn't talking about winning the trade (as a whole), just pointing out that Beams is by far a better/more valuable player than Crisp. Again, if you wanted Crisp factored into comparisons, he still won't present as a better 'get' than Beams. No-one was happy to see the back of Crisp, and we'd have him back in a flash, but we would take Beams first any day.
It's great that Crisp has done well. But he's left out of comparisons, because that's not what the article was about. It was about 15 big name players.Crisp wasn't one of those 15, so any comparison is moot.
I wasn't talking about winning the trade (as a whole), just pointing out that Beams is by far a better/more valuable player than Crisp. Again, if you wanted Crisp factored into comparisons, he still won't present as a better 'get' than Beams. No-one was happy to see the back of Crisp, and we'd have him back in a flash, but we would take Beams first any day.