Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
And Sydney's alternative is what? They will take the top 5 pick from wce and do an on trade with a 3rd club if needed and none of Sydney's academy bids will be top 5 anyway.
Speculation Chad Warner
- Thread starter Dockeroo
- Start date
- Tagged users None
And Sydney's alternative is what? They will take the top 5 pick from wce and do an on trade with a 3rd club if needed and none of Sydney's academy bids will be top 5 anyway.
Get_The_Gaff
Norm Smith Medallist
- Apr 4, 2021
- 6,103
- 14,284
- AFL Club
- West Coast
That's way overs .
Who has ever demanded 2 x top5 picks ?
Judd
Corey has little trade value
Get_The_Gaff
Norm Smith Medallist
- Apr 4, 2021
- 6,103
- 14,284
- AFL Club
- West Coast
That is pretty comparable to the Bolton trade
Snuffaluphagus
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 10, 2015
- 25,399
- 88,001
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
WC like Freo seem to play too nice for their own good. If it was WC, I can see it being their two first round picks with something minor back then everyone justifies it saying how compromised it all is blah blah blah.
Incorrect. If they are that concerned, they can trade away that pick to someone else to something more desirable.
Again, what better offer will swans get than the eagles’ offer?
art of negotiation is leverage. Above all else.
understanding that your offer is the best that can be given is a crucial component.
But then again, our list manager can’t negotiate. So there’s that.
Why should they have to do that when Eagles have the pick that gets it done
Eagles will just pay the pick and be done with it. as they did with baker
I am sure swans will get a decent bag no matter the outcome. Plus $1.5m free cap to keep their list together. That has value.
Never heard of Chris Voss from Black Swan?
- Oct 14, 2016
- 3,055
- 3,803
- AFL Club
- Sydney
We only free up what he's currently on. We probably free up Sheldrick and a rookie's next contracts
I like this accounting.
I mean in the team, if he is replaced by someone with say 15 poss per game, Sydney only reduce possession count by 7-8.
Hardly worth asking for pick 3 I think and paying $1.2-$1.5m.
I like this game.
- Oct 14, 2016
- 3,055
- 3,803
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Settle down. There are possessions, and there are 'possessions'. Warner's are more damaging than most, he's still worth pick 3 and some.
Settle down - have you read what this is about.
There is salary and then there is “salary”.
Pick 3 and some? Who will give you that or more? He is out of contract.
Hawks pick plus future first is more than reasonable. We keep pick 3 because we are rebuilding.
No one can offer more.
Your dreaming
If Eagles are the club to trade for Warner there is no chance your 1st pick is not involved
Swans wont be accepting a pick #10+ in a compromised draft and a future pick which is cents on a dollar when trading
Will be your 1st pick 3-5 plus a 3rd or future 2nd
Our first pick is getting involved. Just a future one.
Again, who can offer more? Swans can then give him $1.5m per year.
It’s a handy haul. Saying no is simply suicide. This isn’t freo trying to get Bolton who has years left on contract mate.
He is out of contract. Swans can’t afford his salary. Eagles are only ones that have the assets to make the trade happen.
Dangerfield Geelong trade is something closer you need to be thinking about. 9+28. And Dangerfield is significantly better player.
Hawks 10-15 and our future top 8 is more than enough. There may be few 2nd rounders in there. More than enough for Sydney to make a difference for them.
Then they can go and get some defenders and forwards. Players they actually need.
Really not sure what planet you are on with some of your comments
Who is offering more ?
Bolton comparison ?
You compare it to a bolton trade but not the Baker trade
What is the difference as both uncontracted
Yes your 1st will be involved and it will be 2025 if there is a trade
and im more than happy to take a bet on that
Clubs pay up for players they chase - As you should know well
Sydney wont accept a F1 and a pick that will be after #10
Last edited:
- Jul 27, 2023
- 5,527
- 16,161
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Bar some unforeseen club resurgence out of the bottom 4 or Oscar Allen leaving as a free agent we will end up with Warner or Rodriguez but not both. There is no conceivable way I see a trade for Warner happening without our 2025 1R pick.
Dangerfield 9 and 28.
Just saying. And Adelaide were matching. I’d push this line hard because unlike Dangerfield situation, Sydney can’t fork out the cash.
As for baker we all know we got taken to cleaners due to our list manager being still in love with his previous employer. At least that’s best case scenario as other option is that he is incompetent.
In which case we may give everything up.
Just saying. And Adelaide were matching. I’d push this line hard because unlike Dangerfield situation, Sydney can’t fork out the cash.
As for baker we all know we got taken to cleaners due to our list manager being still in love with his previous employer. At least that’s best case scenario as other option is that he is incompetent.
In which case we may give everything up.
Dangerfield 9&28.
Whatever we put out is best deal Sydney will get as freo will be out of picture. And Sydney can’t afford to pay what eagles are putting out.
I am not sure what’s difficult to understand here. There are no options here unless Warner says he will take a $0.5m per year pay cut to stay at Sydney. Something that I’m sure wasn’t an issue in baker situation.
- Jul 27, 2023
- 5,527
- 16,161
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Obviously I’d want whoever steps up into the negotiator role instead of that walking cream puff Clarke to drive as hard of a bargain as possible. I’d love to walk away with Warner and Rodriguez, but I can’t see it happening without letting Allen go via FA.
- Jul 27, 2023
- 5,527
- 16,161
- AFL Club
- West Coast
He’s what every club needs, WCE may need to finish 17th to get him. Can’t see Richmond passing on Sharp despite adding Lalor and Smillie, but that’s for a different thread.
