dogwatch
Premium Platinum
The importance of hitouts - or should I say unimportance of hitouts - is an intriguing subject. Five of the top 8 clubs on the ladder are in the bottom 8 for hitouts, including Port who are second last. See table below.We are 1st in the comp for Centre Clearance averages and 1st for total clearances what more could English do whilst he is also leading rucks in disposals, Marks, tackles, intercept possessions and pressure acts?
Or do we want the Sweet type who will get say 5 more hitouts a game and go unsighted once the ball up is complete?
English himself ranks 9th in the AFL but his ranking might be slightly higher than expected if he doesn't share the tap contests around as much as players do at other clubs. I think the overall club ranking is a truer guide to the issue (unless of course you are analysing individual players).
I raised the issue recently asking what is a ruckman these days but nobody seemed to have any opinion. Or maybe nobody could answer it.
Ruckmen used to be the ones who mainly competed for the taps at centre bounces, ball-ups and throw-ins and hopefully took a few marks around the ground. That emphasis on taps (and HOTAs of course) seems misplaced, certainly in the case of players like English whose main talents are elsewhere. To me he's more of an endurance athlete who is not quick but is nevertheless agile and has good ball skills, marking ability and footy smarts. In other words, an extra midfielder ... who happens to be very tall. Really we could put anybody in for the tap as long as they can neutralise the contest and we can dominate the clearances. Josh Dunkley is exhibit A. Hence no need for a hitout specialist dinosaur like Sweet.
Anyone care to venture their definition of a modern day ruckman?
And to be a little bit provocative ... do we call English a ruckman or a midfielder? The catch-all term "follower" is a bit obsolete but might be the best way to describe him.
Table of Average Hitouts per club after Rd 13. Source: Footywire