Agree - he's clearly a starter in our back 6 - he's not a utility.No way webb is sub
blokes all class down back
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agree - he's clearly a starter in our back 6 - he's not a utility.No way webb is sub
blokes all class down back
Dale or McLean for Jong. Whichever one Bev reckons can implement the zone best. Hrovat into the guts for Jong, Bont to take 3rd man up duties. Let's stick with what's working and Hopefully Jongy is back against Freo.
Saints played 2 rucks last week and Riewoldt due back that's Riewoldt Bruce hickey/longer and membry in their f50 need Roberts this weekIf I was a betting man, I would be counting on Cordy to retain his spot.
Given the injury to Jong, think...
Out: Jong (injured), Smith (rested), Roberts (lack of a match up)
In: Wallis, Grant, Biggs
Emergency: Hunter, Dale
If Wallis doesn't come up, then Hunter for sure.
They might keep Roberts if they think he is quick enough to keep up with one of the Saints mosquitoes. I worry our back line might be too top heavy...God, how many times have I thought that in the past...lmao
Not impressed with using Bont as 3rd man up, Snake. This would be like using a Lamborghini to do the supermarket shopping.
No way webb is sub
blokes all class down back
I just wasn't sure who should be sub, I went with Webby because after 3 full games I reckon he could be a bit sore and a mini rest might be good for him. Also allows the fresh legs of Biggs to get a full game.
This will be Boyds game to shine...
Would still give up about 6-7 centimetres to Boyd though I'd say. Not expecting domination or anything of the sort but I'd be looking for Boyd to have a solid game.Delaney is pretty solid down back these days.
Forecasted rain, means roof should be shut which is good news for us I think.
Yeah think the rule is the same, I agree, there's a roof, use it!Where did everything land with the roof? Are they still going to judge it week to week. Makes no sense, just keep it closed in my eyes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Biggs can really play
They are extremely slow movers of the ball. They focus on winning contests and then work the ball short and attempt to maintain possession. Also use the boundary very, very heavily. Their pressure is inconsistent - they're very capable of forcing repeated contested situations and when intensity is up they can make it difficult for opponents to work the ball out and find space. However, when that effort is not there they lack both talent and experience. In short, if that effort drops off they become quite easy to beat.What kind of footy do the Saints play? I haven't watched much of them.
Do they play a heavy press like us or more one on one?
What is the key to beating them and where can we exploit and score heavily?
ie, what did Collingwood do well against them?
They are extremely slow movers of the ball. They focus on winning contests and then work the ball short and attempt to maintain possession. Also use the boundary very, very heavily. Their pressure is inconsistent - they're very capable of forcing repeated contested situations and when intensity is up they can make it difficult for opponents to work the ball out and find space. However, when that effort is not there they lack both talent and experience. In short, if that effort drops off they become quite easy to beat.
As it stands, there are two major steps to beating the Saints: (1) pressure them heavily, and (2) disallow them short marking options defensively. These two combine to expose their average foot skills, force them into turnovers and take advantage of them on the rebound. They don't defend rebound footy well as a consequence of their game style and it's the most direct method of scoring against them.
Funnily enough we actually moved the ball quite quickly last year. People got sucked into the groupthink, I feel. We were the fifth-fastest side for average defence-to-offence transition time in the competition IIRC and over the course of the year we began to play on from free kicks/marks more. The problem was that we had no real system in transition - we blindly moved the ball quickly, but couldn't convert these transitions into actual opportunity.Sounds a bit like our game plan last year?