Changes vs Dogs - Round 7

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 14, 2007
34,293
26,171
Melbourne, Victoria
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Chicago Bulls
Very early but I don't want to think about todays game anymore.

Out
Ricky Petterd (Shoulder)
Stefan Martin
Jared Rivers

In
Jack Watts
Paul Johnson (Yeah that's how pathetic I found Martin's efforts today)
Jordie McKenzie

- If Petterd is in fact out then I see this as the perfect opportunity to give Watts some game time, he's had some games with Casey and I believe it's time for him to chuck on the red and blue jumper again. He is our best replacement if Petterd is out for next week.

- Martin is an absolute pansy, for a bloke that is 6'7 (?) he seems to be afraid of contact even if the opponent is half his size. Go back to Casey and don't play for Melbourne again until you grow some testicles, this has forced me to ask for Paul Johnson to be included against the Dogs.

- While Rivers wasn't good at all today, I'm not condemning him after this one game but this is just a player making way for Jordie McKenzie who we desperately missed today.
 
Very early but I don't want to think about todays game anymore.

Out
Ricky Petterd (Shoulder)
Stefan Martin
Jared Rivers

In
Jack Watts
Paul Johnson (Yeah that's how pathetic I found Martin's efforts today)
Jordie McKenzie

- If Petterd is in fact out then I see this as the perfect opportunity to give Watts some game time, he's had some games with Casey and I believe it's time for him to chuck on the red and blue jumper again. He is our best replacement if Petterd is out for next week.

- Martin is an absolute pansy, for a bloke that is 6'7 (?) he seems to be afraid of contact even if the opponent is half his size. Go back to Casey and don't play for Melbourne again until you grow some testicles, this has forced me to ask for Paul Johnson to be included against the Dogs.

- While Rivers wasn't good at all today, I'm not condemning him after this one game but this is just a player making way for Jordie McKenzie who we desperately missed today.

I'd like Bail over Martin.

I'd like anyone other then Martin over Martin.
 
McKenzie will get his spot back, Bail deserves his spot back.

Being friday night football im not so sure that they'd put Watts in - however i really would like to see him play. The sooner we can address our tall-forward issue the better (or at least work out whether or not Watts is any good)
 

Log in to remove this ad.

In: McKenzie, Gysberts

Out: Martin(omit), Petterd (inj)

* Dunn to help Jamar in the ruck for short stints.
 
Out:

Martin, Warnock, Bruce, Petterd (inj)

In:

McKenzie, Bail, Watts, Strauss


Not happy at all right now.

:(
 
In the third quarter Martin crashed a pack and sent two North players off bleeding, and won the free kick.

I don't think hardness is his biggest problem, and I think that his apparent lack of it could be attributed to the whole team's flatness.


However, I reckon he has major problems with reading the play and focusing, and needs a lot of work in this area if he wants to have a real impact anywhere but defence.

It was embarrassing early on when he ran in the wrong direction as the ball was coming his way, and it lead to a Norf goal.



As for the team:

OUT:
Petterd (injured), Rivers

IN:
McKenzie, Bail (both pending injury), Cheney
 
McKenzie will get his spot back, Bail deserves his spot back.

Being friday night football im not so sure that they'd put Watts in - however i really would like to see him play. The sooner we can address our tall-forward issue the better (or at least work out whether or not Watts is any good)

was he drafted to play AFL footy or because he's good looking
 
was he drafted to play AFL footy or because he's good looking

I just dont want a repeat of queens birthday is all, but i guess he has to handle the pressure both in the game and from the media at some stage.

After the Brisbane game, everyone was stoked about how good things were going and how much apparent depth we have. Now that changes need to be made, we can use some of that depth.

http://demonland.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=20587
Says that Watts just had another "okay" game for Casey, although he kicked 1 and missed two apparently easy shots... so maybe if he kicked 3 it would've been more than an "okay" game.

Cheney, Strauss & Gysberts all had solid games too so they'd be pushing selection.
 
Out:
Petterd (Inj)
Martin
Rivers

In:
Bail
Mckenzie
Watts

We don't need Johnson just yet. Jamar is doing fine. Another big man in the side would only limit our fast paced, run through the middle game plan, which has worked so well.
Bail and Mckenzie to add to this run.

Watts to kick 10?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Out
Martin(can't play)
Dunn(endeavours good, but let's face it, makes too many mistakes)
Rivers(another terrible performance. Leave him in the magoos)
Petterd(injured)
Bruce(too slow, game has simply gone past him)

In
MacKenzie(if fit, has to come back in)
Bail(must play)
Cheney(in form, so has 1 up on Bruce)
Wonemmeiri(why not. With Petterd down, who will kick a goal)
Gysberts(give the kid a game)

Terrible performance today. Words can't describe how bad we were(excluding the 20 mins in the 3rd when we decided to actually run and work hard). Only Green, Scully and maybe Grimes can hold there heads up after that performance. Back to being awful...
 
How injured is Petterd?

We dont know. Could be anything from a few weeks, to a reco and a line through the season.

Wonemmeiri(why not. With Petterd down, who will kick a goal)

Wonna isn't fit yet so he wont be getting a game.

Trengove had to deal with his first tag today, at least he got into the game a little bit in the second half. He'll learn from the experience.
 
We don't need Johnson just yet. Jamar is doing fine. Another big man in the side would only limit our fast paced, run through the middle game plan, which has worked so well.

I am worried that we will burn Jamar out through overwork. Then we will be royally stuffed in the ruck.

Need another big body in the ruck to take some punishment as well.
 
Everyone knows we played way below what the guys have shown over the previous 4 weeks, so the blow torch will be applied to the playing group during the week... Petterd was obviously injured going in to the game, & probably won't get up this week, I think he will be the only change this week, possibbly Rivers (depending on match ups)....


IN: McKenzie (if fit) was he injured????
Maybe: Bail or Strauss


Out : Petterd & ????

Forget about dropping Bruce, if he didn't play today, we would of been pumped by 10 goals....
 
OUT: Petterd (inj), Martin, Rivers, Bate

IN: McKenzie, Bail, Cheney, Miller (I know but at least he can take a mark and try to have a shot unlike Martin)

Reasons:
Petterd - Injured
Martin - Useless hack
Rivers - Just didn't do enough plus bulldogs don't have real tall fwd line
Bate - Played terrible and to make it worse his opponent was Hansen. Only got 8 touches to Hansen's 16 or something like that.
 
IN: MCKENZIE, BAIL, WATTS
OUT: PETTERD (NEVER SHOULD HAVE PLAYED), MARTIN (GOING NOWHERE FAST), RIVERS (SHOULD NEVER PLAY IN THE RED AND BLUE AGAIN).

Please Melbourne do not go back to the same failures like Miller and Johnson again. We need Watts in the team now the sooner we can get him used to the tempo of the AFL the better off we will be. He doesn't seem to be getting anything out of playing in the VFL and it is embarrassing that he is still playing at that level.
 
IN: MCKENZIE, BAIL, WATTS
OUT: PETTERD (NEVER SHOULD HAVE PLAYED), MARTIN (GOING NOWHERE FAST), RIVERS (SHOULD NEVER PLAY IN THE RED AND BLUE AGAIN).

Please Melbourne do not go back to the same failures like Miller and Johnson again. We need Watts in the team now the sooner we can get him used to the tempo of the AFL the better off we will be. He doesn't seem to be getting anything out of playing in the VFL and it is embarrassing that he is still playing at that level.

If he can't make it at VFL level at the moment why should he be rewarded with a spot in our starting 22 against the doggies?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top