Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe Brian Cook is on the record saying Geelong cannot afford to bottom out (can anyone confirm this)? In which case, perhaps Scott is achieving his KPIs by taking Geelong to finals every year and any finals wins are a bonus. Many Geelong fans would be very uncomfortable about this, were it true.
An interesting statistic is Geelong's performance in the first week of the finals since 2012: the Cats are 0-7 in Qualifying / Elimination finals. Geelong's terrible week #1 record goes some way to explaining Geelong's 0-4 record in Preliminary finals, because the Qualifying Final loss has resulted in a tougher Preliminary Final assignment.
We beat hawthorn (just)
Geelong has filled in the gaps quite well. Next year will be harder as some key players get a year older and others need to step up. Sooner or later you have to bottom out as Hawthorn and Norf is quickly discovering. Not sure what the thinking at Norf is but they are setting themselves up for a catastrophic 3-5 years.I believe Brian Cook is on the record saying Geelong cannot afford to bottom out (can anyone confirm this)? In which case, perhaps Scott is achieving his KPIs by taking Geelong to finals every year and any finals wins are a bonus. Many Geelong fans would be very uncomfortable about this, were it true.
An interesting statistic is Geelong's performance in the first week of the finals since 2012: the Cats are 1-7 in Qualifying / Elimination finals. Geelong's terrible week one record goes some way to explaining Geelong's 0-4 record in Preliminary finals, because the Qualifying Final loss has resulted in a tougher Preliminary Final assignment.
As Jose Mourinho would say, tomorrow is squeaky bum time for Geelong.
Its easier during the season during finals the lesser likes wilts
Long or short story?Then why are the Bombers so bad at both?
The point on his 1st season was he walked in to coach an existing premiership list with everything a coach needs to win. He didn't build the list nor greatly influence it in the first 12 months.
After that his record is poor in finals.
Alex Ferguson, not Mourinho.As Jose Mourinho would say, tomorrow is squeaky bum time for Geelong.
All BS aside, I've said before Scott is a seriously good coach. To keep up that track record in spite of dilution of talent (GWS/GC), a once in a generation array of talent coming to an end is impressive.Except that he didn't. They didn't make the grand final the year before, they lost their best player, and we're an aging list. Chris Scott pioneered the strategy of deliberately rotating/resting players each week throughout the season, which was documented by journalists at the time (even questioning the strategy mid season), and it's still used to this day by Geelong and other teams. Here's just one article from 2018 about Richmond following Scott's model...
Tigers strategy? Give it a rest
Richmond find themselves in player-management sweet spot, and can follow the template Geelong pioneered back in 2011 for sustained success.www.theage.com.au
Geelong 2011 also had a statistically better season than 2007 and 2009. In 2011 they only lost 3 games for the season and had a higher percentage than 07 and 09. Why didn't Thompson achieve that with the same players?
For me personally, 2011 was Geelong's best year of the three GFs, and it was largely thanks to Chris Scott.
He's pretty clearly better strategically than Thompson, and i highly doubt Thompson would have made 9 of the last 10 finals series, to even have a shot at losing. Have you seriously looked at some of the team's Scott had to work with during his time? Especially in the middle years - to finish top 4 with some of those team lineups was impressive.
All BS aside, I've said before Scott is a seriously good coach. To keep up that track record in spite of dilution of talent (GWS/GC), a once in a generation array of talent coming to an end is impressive.
Edit: No fans of any club apart from Geelong over the last 15 years or so has been able to start the season genuinely believing (not hoping) they will contend.
He sure is. If he converts a couple of the next 5 seasons into flags he goes down as a great.Thats what I always argue. Geelong do as well as they do largely because of Chris Scott. The majority of the team is composed of picks deep in the draft, mature age players, and aging stars, with a couple of exceptions. The team is practically unrecognisable from 2011, and yet still continues to make Prelims with very few high draft picks. Geelong lost Kelly last year, lost Selwood and Ablett for large chunks of the year, and still finished top 4. Without the homeground advantage that many claimed was the reasons for Geelongs high finishes in previous seasons.
A couple of years ago, I would have thought Geelong were gone without Selwood, and now I think that is no longer the case. A couple of years before that, I thought we were doomed without Bartel and Enright. The list goes on; Geelong find a way to replace this amazing players seemingly with people out of nowhere.
I don't think, I think he is a good coach.
Guess he is pretty ok
Yep. Best midfield ever.He's had the greatest midfield ever assembled at his disposal since Ablett returned, anything less than a grand final win is a fail on his yearly report card.
No current season stats available
Feels like it is all on the line for Chris Scottnow.PLAYERCARDSTARTChris Scott
- Age
- 48
- Ht
- 182cm
- Wt
- 89kg
- Pos.
- Fwd
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 16.6
- 4star
- K
- 11.2
- 4star
- HB
- 5.4
- 4star
- M
- 5.1
- 5star
- T
- 1.6
- 4star
- G
- 0.4
- 3star
No current season stats available
- D
- 13.2
- 4star
- K
- 10.2
- 4star
- HB
- 3.0
- 3star
- M
- 2.2
- 3star
- T
- 2.8
- 5star
- G
- 0.4
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
Ok, you do that.Nah bullshit, won't have a bar of that narrative.
GFs should be considered 50/50 propositions, and unless you're a GWS 2019 or Port 2007, I won't be throwing shade at a losing side or their coaching setup.