Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Most outlets reported the same thing, but no video that I’m aware of.I heard sky news say he shook his head slightly on the first verdict.is the video up to check?
I agree. I also hope that anyone who was in denial about him is launched out of that and starts wracking their brains to think of anything that may be useful. Anything, no matter how small, may be the key.been away from this thread for long time, just wanted to add a plea here to anyone connected to BRE.
Once the sentencing and appeals are done, and he knows he is in for life, please, please appeal to him to man-up and disclose everything he can re. Sarah.
Can you please elaborate.A quick shoutout to the crack detective team who not only got the verdict they mostly wanted, but solved another outstanding CSK trial mystery today.
Though they took 10 months to do so.
A quick shoutout to the crack detective team who not only got the verdict they mostly wanted, but solved another outstanding CSK trial mystery today.
Though they took 10 months to do so.
You are referring to us BF detectives are you not?
https://thewest.com.au/ has a 28:44 long video of the judgement being made by Justice Hall on the front page of its website now.is the video up to check?
https://thewest.com.au/ has the video of the judgement being made by Justice Hall on the front page of its website now
View attachment 969566
It's already up on the WASC website if you register to watch it.There is a copy going up on the supreme court website but it will be remoeved fairly soon
It's paywalled though.
These were the parts I thought interesting as well.In the official 28 minute video of Justice Hall I've nearly finished watching, Justice Hall says that he is busy up until the 23rd December 2020, hence his request for the sentencing to be on the 23rd or 24th.
But the 24th appears to have been put aside if necessary for the sentencing, as well as the 23rd it was now been listed as.
Hall also said that "a psychological report would not necessarily be of any benefit".
He only asked for a psychiatric report and that psychiatric reports can take some time to be done at the moment and taking longer than usual at present.
On the video, the last working day of October (Friday 30th) is the deadline for the victim impact statements.
Pre-trial evidence excluded from the trial might be relied on for sentencing.
This evidence is going to be revisited now to see if it is of relevance and notice will be given to all parties if it is deemed of relevance.
(Prosecution that said that in the video off camera)
These were the parts I thought interesting as well.
So they are after the medical diagnostic side psychologically, rather than any insight into Edwards’ feelings about the situation. Makes sense - there is not a lot of scope for variation in sentencing based on his perspective on things.
Will be interesting if some of the previously inadmissible evidence can now be looked at, as that will offer further revelations.
This relates to requests that the offender never be released. It is actually S 90(1)(b). It is confusing because it used to be S91, but was amended in 2008 to be under S90.In the trial video today, the State says that they be seeking an order under Section 91B of the sentencing Act
What is that section for?
Which court did you make it into this morning Jezza?I can't remember the exact wording but I think Carmel suggested some of the inadmissible evidence woud be used.
Yeah well done. “Hello Jezza” famoooouuusA quick shoutout to the crack detective team who not only got the verdict they mostly wanted, but solved another outstanding CSK trial mystery today.
Though they took 10 months to do so.
I speculate that the 10 months Jezza refers to, is the just under 10 months he has been a member of BF and posting on here about the CSKCan you please elaborate.