Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 101,009
- 253,795
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #420
Full Presser at the link below.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty sure he said the same when first announced. I'm not sure why anyone keeps questioning what Clarko says. People want to read into things as much as the media feeds this. But still the story hasnt changed. Oh but he will coach th Blues next year.
Clarko wants control of the list decisions. How can you not as senior coach??The way I'm reading this now is this: they are moving into uncharted territory a little now, so there's been a little (completely understandable) tension and a few rocky moments here and there along the way, and there will probably continue to be for a while, it's just that the clickbait-desperate media has blown the tension way, way out of proportion for a 'story' that is probably barely there.
Anyone else reading it the same? Or different?
The hyper overblown stuff goes without saying. The genuine and deliberate attempt to destabilise the club is real.The way I'm reading this now is this: they are moving into uncharted territory a little now, so there's been a little (completely understandable) tension and a few rocky moments here and there along the way, and there will probably continue to be for a while, it's just that the clickbait-desperate media has blown the tension way, way out of proportion for a 'story' that is probably barely there.
Anyone else reading it the same? Or different?
What?Why doubt Clarko? Because he's simultaneously the genius heart of the club and unable to stand-up to the Kennett.
Do you mean, on the part of the media, or from within?The hyper overblown stuff goes without saying. The genuine and deliberate attempt to destabilise the club is real.
What?
not sure I follow your logic here.
my point was that everything that every person representing Hawthorn has said in recent weeks has been the same message. Nothing has changed. Only the flip flopping inaccuracies of media has changed. Tell me how this is inaccurate?
the decision that Clarkson will not be coach is done and dusted. Whether you or I agree with it means little now. It’s about what happens now in the transition.
I understand there was a long term plan, and when Sam moved to Eagles it was understood that it was a part of the experience plan. Now we have all got pretty frustrated by how this last 2 to 3 weeks, the plan has not been executed properly because it appears that the refusal to do the Collingwood interview, (the interview is not the problem, the refusal was the start of the problem publicly)Heard from a club insider that Clarko had a longstanding plan to leave after his current contract. If that’s true it explains a lot. It’s a view that some have shared publicly but hasn’t seemed to have gained any traction. Is that because true or false, it ends the speculation and the clicks?
External. Media.Do you mean, on the part of the media, or from within?
Read my OP, therein lies your answer to that.External. Media.
Some internally may have had indifferences but I simply refuse to believe they would drag the whole club through the mud allowing external parasites to dictate outcomes
are you suggesting there is strong internal self inflicting destabilisation. If so, they won’t be at the club for too long
Where is the Op you are referring to..page#?Read my OP, therein lies your answer to that.
At the Hawks or elsewhere?
Do you mean, on the part of the media, or from within?
All perfectly possible, but the one before you, saying it done its dusted it happening, I say to that= this, the way it has been handled has dropped my opinion of my club right at this point of time. And I am a long long long term follower , Even Schwabby had the then Presidents arm around his shoulders when it was over, I feel Alastair's been sacked! What you may say?? Maybe wrong, thats how it looks! And I'm dumbfounded!I was supporting your point with poorly delivered sarcasm. The media can only be accurate if Clarkson, Mitchell, Kennett and everyone else who has spoken on this says the exact opposite in private to what they say in public. Clarkson because he's a gullible rube. Mitchell because he's an untrustworthy conniver. And Kennett because he's a Machiavellian psychopath.
I would say that sounds about right.The way I'm reading this now is this: they are moving into uncharted territory a little now, so there's been a little (completely understandable) tension and a few rocky moments here and there along the way, and there will probably continue to be for a while, it's just that the clickbait-desperate media has blown the tension way, way out of proportion for a 'story' that is probably barely there.
Anyone else reading it the same? Or different?
Ignoring the media, all the statements, interviews and pressers from the Club, Clarko and Sam have been strong and emphatic.So is everyone feeling more at ease after the Clarko interview today ?