Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
View attachment 905822
BREAKING: Collingwood star Jordan De Goey charged with sexual assault
Collingwood star Jordan De Goey has been charged with sexual assault.
Foxfooty.com.au can reveal De Goey and another 24-year-old male have been charged in relation to an incident that is alleged to have taken place in 2015.
Victoria Police delivered the following statement to foxfooty.com.au on Saturday.
“Detectives from the Sexual Crimes Squad have charged two people in relation to a reported sexual assault,” it read.
“Two 24-year-olds, one from Hampton East and one from Clematis, have both been charged with indecent assault and bailed to appear at Melbourne Magistrates‘ Court at a later date.
De Goey had 21 disposals against Essendon on Friday night. Photo: Rob Prezioso/AAP Image.Source: AAP
“The charges are in relation to an incident which is alleged to have occurred in Kew in 2015. As this matter is now before the court, police will not be making any further comment.”
Collingwood is expected to release a statement on Saturday afternoon.
Collingwood star Jordan De Goey charged with sexual assault
Collingwood star Jordan De Goey charged with sexual assaultwww.foxsports.com.au
Id suggest the drug problem that has infiltrated West Coast for 30+ years doesnt place you in a position to speak in such way.
A full club drug problem is worse than two or three individual dickheads
Police investigated on Collingwood’s insistence. Yeah righto Ed.
Go on tell us the full story about these 2. You obviously have different info to the everyone else.
I’m not attacking the media I’m saying if the chargers are proven to not be true that he should get an apology from the media
But if he has done it punish him accordingly be it jail and so on
Not for reporting facts I more mean all the speculation and articles that will attack him before he sees a court roomWhy would they apologise for reporting facts? He has been charged by the police with a serious crime.
I dont understand what Im missing, it says in 2018 it was investigated by VicPol with no charges laid?
Doesn't that mean the matter is dealt with and no criminal charges were laid?
Can someone clarify?
Collingwood statement
Burden of proof is not speculation. That is fact.Are you the victims lawyer??
Maybe some assaults don't result in charges because they weren't assaults??
My speculation about a weak accusation is just as valid as your speculation about the burden of proof and superior legal representation!
Neither of us know sh*t. So get off your horse.
Agree. Awful, tone deaf statement.That’s a very, very poor statement from Collingwood. I’m actually pretty shocked by that.
“Well it was investigated before and he wasn’t charged”
... um, what? He’s been charged now.
“He’ll remain part of the football program”... ie it’s all business as usual here.
These are very serious, sensitive charges. That’s a really ugly boys’ club response.
Whoever ticked that off has had a shocker. You’d hope it wasn’t the AFL or there are real problems.
"At Collingwood's insistence"That’s a very, very poor statement from Collingwood. I’m actually pretty shocked by that.
“Well it was investigated before and he wasn’t charged”
... um, what? He’s been charged now.
“He’ll remain part of the football program”... ie it’s all business as usual here.
These are very serious, sensitive charges. That’s a really ugly boys’ club response.
Whoever ticked that off has had a shocker. You’d hope it wasn’t the AFL or there are real problems.
Up to 5 years but each situation is vastly different.
So you have got nothing to back up your statement.The full story: Collingwood’s culture stinks