I’d suggest they’d have better offers than that unfortunately.I hope we’re looking to offload our 3x 3rd rounders to Brisbane for their first.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’d suggest they’d have better offers than that unfortunately.I hope we’re looking to offload our 3x 3rd rounders to Brisbane for their first.
Hawthorn want him off the books, wouldn't be surprised if they let him go for around pick 25, especially if we pay all of Mitchels contract for next year.Mitchell is a no brainer. They are dreaming if they think they are getting a 1st for a 29yo though.
What do you think they will want?
And what do you think he will want on financial terms?
He’s 30 next season in May…
He will want 3-4 year deal for sure and nothing short of $700k considering he is a brownlow medallist …
It’s a hard pass for me…
How is Tom Mitchell not a big name midfielder?
I’d love to hope dean can play but he hasn’t played a single game so can’t really just hope. He’s also not a KPD size.
Keeler, KDF, top 15 Mid would be the absolute dreamThat sounds good maybe pick up Keeler later on top?
Yeah if he want that sort of coin we’d be better off with Dunkley.What do you think they will want?
And what do you think he will want on financial terms?
He’s 30 next season in May…
He will want 3-4 year deal for sure and nothing short of $700k considering he is a brownlow medallist …
It’s a hard pass for me…
Hawthorn were looking to offload him a while back, so, despite the Brownlow, that now makes him scratch and dent sale material.
Context matters. Hawks we're trying to offload Mitchell, Bruest, Gunston and JoM. All their senior players who they thought might have some value. They were ruthlessly trying to fast track a rebuild through the draft. It was no reflection of those blokes as footballers.Mitchell can't run, gets no attention because he can't hurt you with his possessions and the Hawks have been trying to dump him for years with no takers, ask yourself why.
In terms of needs, do we need another young kpd if we recruit Frampton. Frampton, Dean, MacMahon and maybe Kelly is a fair few developing ones. You'd take a best available one, but not another speculative one.Keeler, KDF, top 15 Mid would be the absolute dream
Surely get at least 2 of the 3
We lure him on the basis that he moves purely beyond depth once Cox retires, and as Cameron progress to the later part of his career.At the time of his recruitment, we considered him a part of our 22 moving forward, and our pitch to him to move to us was based around that.
He was a developing ruck/forward at the Swans, who moved for more senior opportunity, which is what we offered him. Same situation as when Nankervis left Sydney for the Tigers, and Witts left for the Suns.
I ask again, how do you propose we lure a player like that over if we are intending to only use them as depth?
Once again you’re working on the assumption that Cox will be more than depth next year. It’s unlikely that we play him, Cameron, McStay, Checkers and AJ in the same team. From those players Cox is the likely out, so you’d be basing it solely on replacing Cameron down the road, and it’s unlikely that a player in the cusp moving for more opportunity will want to wait that long to replace the incumbent ruck.We lure him on the basis that he moves beyond depth once Cox retires, and as Cameron progress to the later part of his career.
I don’t look at dean as someone who can play on the big KPF’s atm. Just my opinion.Since when is 195cm and 90kg not KPD size?
He wouldn't get a look into their forward line. Hickey is a better ruck. Cameron a bit better around the ground. Depends on which they value higher.I don't think he would get a game at swans outside of injuries.
Yes, I believe it's called a screaming eagle.Could we pull off Titch and Taranto lol?
Yes, I believe it's called a screaming eagle.
I don’t look at dean as someone who can play on the big KPF’s atm. Just my opinion.
Mitchell can't run, gets no attention because he can't hurt you with his possessions and the Hawks have been trying to dump him for years with no takers, ask yourself why.
Quite possiblyWill the Hawks pay 300k of his salary?
I would prefer Hopper to TarantoIncreased our interest in Hopper
They have loads in their capHawthorn want him off the books, wouldn't be surprised if they let him go for around pick 25, especially if we pay all of Mitchels contract for next year.
I would prefer Hopper to Taranto