Would be one more list spot for that Richmond trade.
Traded Collingwood trade F2, F3, F4 to Gold Coast for #22, 46, 58, 79 & F4
- Thread starter Taylor
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
79 is because if you use 6 say 6 picks to match daicos and dib you still have to fill the 4 vacant senior list spots on the night (or elevate 2 rookies and do a 2-2 split) so this giving you picks in the 60s (thats where 79 will end up) to do that.
Free pre-listing of academy players this year.
RobJD
Club Legend
- Oct 1, 2021
- 1,685
- 3,172
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Just like the Terminator, we'll be back
96 and 114 will do that just as easily!
Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
True although you might use all 3 of those picks.
- Nov 14, 2013
- 1,557
- 5,923
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Colts, Raptors, Milan, FU Crabs
Smart trade by the Pies and GC.
I was fully on board with North picking Daicos at #1, purely because a deficit next year could potentially benefit us by improving our first rounder.
Now that Collingwood have enough points, there's no reason for us to bid on him 1st, other than to piss of Collingwood, which would be a dumb bridge to burn for no benefit.
Plus GC get to shuffle all of there draft capital into 2022, where they should have cap flexibility and plenty of picks to bundle up into the 1st round.
Another thing to note is De Goey, Maynard and Moore all hitting FA next year. If Collingwood have another bad year, letting 2x of those guys go could net some extra top 5 picks anyway.
I was fully on board with North picking Daicos at #1, purely because a deficit next year could potentially benefit us by improving our first rounder.
Now that Collingwood have enough points, there's no reason for us to bid on him 1st, other than to piss of Collingwood, which would be a dumb bridge to burn for no benefit.
Plus GC get to shuffle all of there draft capital into 2022, where they should have cap flexibility and plenty of picks to bundle up into the 1st round.
Another thing to note is De Goey, Maynard and Moore all hitting FA next year. If Collingwood have another bad year, letting 2x of those guys go could net some extra top 5 picks anyway.
WinstonWolfe
Cancelled
- Sep 23, 2021
- 245
- 265
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
I think the experts forget the Pies netted 5 top 30 (actually 31) draft picks in 2020. And another at pick 44.
They'll grab Daicos, Lipinski and Kreuger (both young and fill a need), as well as our NGA prospect in Dib who will likely be matched after pick 20.
As of now, we have 2 picks in 2022, one of which is likely to be top 4 or 5. I'm sure we can add another to that, even if it's a 3rd rounder.
They'll grab Daicos, Lipinski and Kreuger (both young and fill a need), as well as our NGA prospect in Dib who will likely be matched after pick 20.
As of now, we have 2 picks in 2022, one of which is likely to be top 4 or 5. I'm sure we can add another to that, even if it's a 3rd rounder.
- Apr 23, 2016
- 35,640
- 51,355
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Have a look at WBD this year with Darcy.
You may have missed the hysteria, (oh there wasn’t any).
You mean the team that just played off in a GF, took JUH at #1 last year, and getting Darcy inside the Top 5 this year isn't getting as much criticism as a team that finished bottom 4 after trading Treloar & Stephenson out for peanuts last year, and are having to trade out of most of the 2022 draft because they sold their 2021 first rounder last year also for peanuts?
Yeah it's weird why they're not getting as much commentary.
Anzacday
Moderator
Is the rule that each club has to make 3 selections at the national draft?
- Apr 23, 2016
- 35,640
- 51,355
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Yes, he fixed it. In the sense that Collingwood has traded out of the 2022 draft to do so. Which is the flow-on effect of the disaster that Ned Guy oversaw.
With a few guys coming in on the cheap like Lipinski and Krueger it might work out OK yet, but Daicos would want to be exceptional.
Traded out of 22 draft?
We have kept our 1st next year and we are a year away from 22 draft.
And with a high chance Moore or De goey leaves you will have two first rounders after compensation
- Apr 23, 2016
- 35,640
- 51,355
- AFL Club
- Essendon
So, one player for 2022 at this point. Strong draft hand.
Maybe trading out of the 2023 draft can fix that.
Last edited:
- Jun 19, 2016
- 21,297
- 41,340
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
What else do you propose they do? Pass on Daicos? It’s either that or trade 2022 picks to pay for him like they have done.
- Apr 23, 2016
- 35,640
- 51,355
- AFL Club
- Essendon
There's nothing they can do after the 2020 period. The poster I was replying to was asking why the Dogs aren't getting criticised. Because they didn't mishandle the 2020 period causing a flow-on effect in 2021 and 2022, and that they just played off in a GF so aren't in the midst of trying to restock their list.
Yes. Promotions from rookie to senior list count too.
- Jun 19, 2016
- 21,297
- 41,340
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
No you’re making claims that they don’t have a strong 2022 draft hand 12 months out ignoring the fact they drafted a load of kids last year, get a potential number 1 rated pick this year, have protected their first next year with plenty of opportunity to trade back in next year anyway.
Yep, high chance.
Would be better for Collingwood that one of the departs as well. Still in a massive hole draft pick wise which is slowing down the rebuild.
- Sep 30, 2009
- 5,337
- 7,966
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Plus there is next to zero chance we just let a low pick (22) basically get consumed for no reason.
It’s pretty obvious that it will be used for something else.
Personally I think we just simply split this pick across this and next years draft. Or alternatively trade it out during the matching process and back in for a top 30 selection afterwards (with the required 2 seperate clubs)
