That's kinda nasty
I probably have a list of other players in front of him just out of, well, nastiness, but He'd be good on that list anyway. Mind the gap!
Because they're so fumbly, the player with the most clangers in the match is the one to grab the old dustbuster and give the cinema room a once over. They're guaranteed to be popcorn spillers.
We are talking about AFL players, not division 3 suburban footballers.
That’s how how football media works. One round gives them their stories until the next round disproves everything they said and they pick new stories to run with, and so it goes. Switch it off until North gives them some better material.
All that'd be well worth of a bit of "boy oh boy, gee whiz, wow wee"
Imagine the narrative had we tanked.......there'd be calls for a Royal Commission.
They’ll keep reminding us until we start winning games and then all will be forgotten.
good joke.
*make finals Goldstein has 2 possessions and Magoo costs them the game with a 10m shank on the full, Logan gets exposed as the Joe the Goose specialist and JHF is on Dr Phil talking mummy issues.
Shades of "it's not racist to boo Adam Goodes".
No doubt losing experience hurts a team, which is why it's always amusing to see the first people listed in the weekly Changes topic 5 seconds after the final siren of another loss to be the likes of Corr and McDonald, with their replacements inevitably debutants.
I’d rather McKercher become a star than cheer some kid doing an ACL.
Nope, never worth wishing ill on another player.
It never ceases to amaze me how often it is that multiple AFL RePorTeRs seem to independently make the same observation or discovery. It appears that they must go through somewhat similar analysis processes to undertake a line of investigation and that they complete their determinations by a remarkable coincidence, on the same day, also with pretty much identical interpretations or opinions.
