Contesting the striking charge...Jack Graham that is.

Remove this Banner Ad

what about hooker cleaning up wingard at 19m mark of 2nd. mix of caddy / jack and does not get media cover nor MRO focus.. bloody outcome and bias.
Thought the same thing. Makes no sense.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I think he will go . The defence with the pressure line is bluff and irrelevant bc in the end it’s the manner of the hit. If they pull this off with that argument then it will make a mockery of the whole system. Good luck for trying , but I would have given $10 k to the Alannah Madeline Foundation.
 
Waste of time IMO, tribunal are gun shy after the AFL stepped in last year in the Houli case and will not overturn any appeal. Graham will not play this week and we are 10k poorer.
Agree will probably get two now
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Contesting the striking charge...Jack Graham that is.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top