nobbyiscool
Brownlow Medallist
- Aug 11, 2006
- 23,354
- 25,853
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
- Other Teams
- TasTigers, JJs, MV, CRaiders, PhEagles
Inb4 arakaan invites you to a Super Bowl party
Best
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Inb4 arakaan invites you to a Super Bowl party
HahaInb4 arakaan invites you to a Super Bowl party
I'm about to go see a super hot European chick and get validation of my character in the real world.
I have posted dozens of times in the Packers thread for years... But yeah didn't expect to be met so harshly
Same thing with the Vikings. They have 26 players on offence, which is probably one or two players too many. They've already traded for an OL from the Chargers and I'd guess there's more to come.The aspect of the coverage that does my head in the most is the lack of understanding of NFL rosters.
They are fluid. Every roster will look very different by week 17.
Teams play strategy with roster management as much as they do with X & O's. Look at New Orleans are a prime example of this. They play all sorts of games trying to get players on and off the practice squad. Currently the Saints have only 4WRs & 2TE's in the 53. There is no way they go into week 1 without another receiver. So I would suspect they have more confidence of a cut receiver clearing waivers now than they do another player. If you suspect there's an opposition team ready to pounce then you'll wait out them filling the spot from elsewhere. Or, they are talking to a team about a trade. Either way their 53 will change this week.
A whole OL from the Chargers?Same thing with the Vikings. They have 26 players on offence, which is probably one or two players too many. They've already traded for an OL from the Chargers and I'd guess there's more to come.
As you say, every team is doing this sort of thing on a day by day basis. One of the Move the Sticks podcasts discussed a typical week for a head coach, there's so much more than just game preparation.
Ellington will be the #3 WR and his roster spot was never in doubt. If they planned on using Ellington as the PR again this season, then I don't see why Hayne would be on the 53 man roster. Allowing a roster spot to be used on a backup PR seems unlikely.I don't think he is going to be active in week 1 - Bush was never really the competition for the punt returning spot, it was Bruce Ellington who is still on their list.
I think it's probably going to take a bit of air out of the story... but they aren't going to have 2 active punt returners, and Ellington as a 5th WR is worth more than Hayne as a 4th RB.
Your avatar must smell like shit, there's always a fly there on my screen.Ellington will be the #3 WR and his roster spot was never in doubt. If they planned on using Ellington as the PR again this season, then I don't see why Hayne would be on the 53 man roster. Allowing a roster spot to be used on a backup PR seems unlikely.
I think we'll see Hayne active in week 1 and returning the 1st punt of the season. I'd also be surprised if he isn't given at least one snap on offense.
"I hereby declare today to be Jarryd Hayne Day"
too soon?
What does the size of the organisation have to do with anything (let alone whether the 49ers are a large one)
The 49ers have one of the weakest backfields/return games in the league. They were an ideal team for him.
Your comment makes no sense at all.