Conspiracy Theory Coronavirus #2: Lockdowns

Thoughts on COVID-19? (Choose 2 options)

  • It's a naturally occurring virus

    Votes: 15 20.3%

  • It came from a Chinese laboratory

    Votes: 31 41.9%

  • It came from a US/other laboratory

    Votes: 5 6.8%

  • It's dangerous and harsh restrictions are necessary

    Votes: 19 25.7%

  • It's not dangerous enough to warrant harsh restrictions

    Votes: 22 29.7%

  • It's basically another flu, so restrictions are silly

    Votes: 14 18.9%
  • Total voters
    74

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
MrKK said:
The whole lockdown strategy is based on the world believing the CCP when they said it worked in China.
Click to expand...

Except that it's worked everywhere else in the world it's been tried? It's a blunt force approach, but there's no disputing that it's effective.

MrKK said:
We'd have been better off treating them with the usual pile of salt and relying on our tried and tested pandemic plans.
Click to expand...

You mean like the UK initially tried to? Then realised the death toll would be way beyond what the public would be willing to accept.

Joey JoJo Shabad said:
I find it funny how the flu jab is still being recommended as winter approaches, But because the flu has been rebranded as covid, I'm sure the sheep will obey the overlords & get the covid jab as well as the flu jab.
Click to expand...

 
owen87 said:
Have people around the world not been asking to find out how this all began since very early on? Along with having absolutely 0 confidence in the information coming out of the CCP regarding basically everything?
Click to expand...
Many people were asking the question, but they were called conspiracy theorists and racists. Facebook and youtube censored their posts, deleting and "fact checking" them.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

zill said:
Many people were asking the question, but they were called conspiracy theorists and racists. Facebook and youtube censored their posts, deleting and "fact checking" them.
Click to expand...

No, that's not what happened.

People didn't get blocked for asking questions, they got blocked and censored for saying the CCP definitely manufactured and deliberately released the virus in order to execute some form of NWO plan or to deliberately destroy Western economies.
 
The definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over yet expecting different results. Lockdown kicks the can down the road, it works for a couple months until a case pops up then... you guessed it. Lockdown again. Circle work

Jump at shadows again in July once winter kicks in and flu season ramps up, only it isn't the flu as covid cured that
 
40k people go and get tested but only 16k get jabbed.

If you were so petrified of covid wouldn't you go and get jabbed instead of tested.................................

unless most of those getting tested have already been jabbed which just goes to show how mentally messed up they are.
 
owen87 said:
No, that's not what happened.

People didn't get blocked for asking questions, they got blocked and censored for saying the CCP definitely manufactured and deliberately released the virus in order to execute some form of NWO plan or to deliberately destroy Western economies.
Click to expand...
Complete and utter lie. Facebook had a specific policy that you could not assert that the virus was man-made, i.e. that scientists hybridised a bat coronavirus so it would be transmissible between humans.

They also deleted posts claiming that the mortality rate of covid was the same as seasonal flu, despite being backed up by statistical evidence.

Other things that were verbotten were claiming that masks could make the wearer ill, or that vaccines had negative side effects like blood clots.

Facebook and their ilk have lumped legitimate science in with bizarre conspiracy theories to muddy the waters and discredit health information that doesn't suit their narrative. It has obviously worked, you are a prime example of that. The question you need to ask yourself is WHY this happened. It's certainly not for your benefit, so why did it happen.



EDIT: The link doesn't work for some reason, you can search for it by typing - facebook covid-19 policy updates and protections
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

zill said:
Complete and utter lie. Facebook had a specific policy that you could not assert that the virus was man-made, i.e. that scientists hybridised a bat coronavirus so it would be transmissible between humans.

They also deleted posts claiming that the mortality rate of covid was the same as seasonal flu, despite being backed up by statistical evidence.

Other things that were verbotten were claiming that masks could make the wearer ill, or that vaccines had negative side effects like blood clots.

Facebook and their ilk have lumped legitimate science in with bizarre conspiracy theories to muddy the waters and discredit health information that doesn't suit their narrative. It has obviously worked, you are a prime example of that. The question you need to ask yourself is WHY this happened. It's certainly not for your benefit, so why did it happen.

Click to expand...


Pretty much nothing in your post is supported by evidence except the bolded. And the people getting banned for negative side effect claims were not posting about that.

The problem is that so many Pete Evans types were spouting absolute nonsense, to the point that it obscured any genuine information, that people now have absolutely no sense of reality.

If you want to use that as evidence of some kind of far reaching NWO conspiracy then go for it, but anyone with a semblance of reality would know that all the politicians regarded as driving this aren't nearly intelligent enough to pull it off.
 
Tiger Toffee said:
40k people go and get tested but only 16k get jabbed.

If you were so petrified of covid wouldn't you go and get jabbed instead of tested.................................

unless most of those getting tested have already been jabbed which just goes to show how mentally messed up they are.
Click to expand...
If you get tagged as a close contact through work or family member you will go and get tested, not sure that would amount to anything close to 40k people though.
 
owen87 said:
Pretty much nothing in your post is supported by evidence except the bolded. And the people getting banned for negative side effect claims were not posting about that.

The problem is that so many Pete Evans types were spouting absolute nonsense, to the point that it obscured any genuine information, that people now have absolutely no sense of reality.

If you want to use that as evidence of some kind of far reaching NWO conspiracy then go for it, but anyone with a semblance of reality would know that all the politicians regarded as driving this aren't nearly intelligent enough to pull it off.
Click to expand...
I took it all from facebook covid-19 policy page. i couldn't link it but it hasn't been removed, you can search it for yourself.
 
zill said:
I took it all from facebook covid-19 policy page. i couldn't link it but it hasn't been removed, you can search it for yourself.
Click to expand...

I mean the claims you're saying they were censoring.

If you want to get angry about Facebook or Twitter censoring what people can post, then get angry about all the morons who posted absolutely made up drivel like Pete Evans that forced Governments to lean on those private platforms to implement censorship.
 
Tiger Toffee said:
40k people go and get tested but only 16k get jabbed.

If you were so petrified of covid wouldn't you go and get jabbed instead of tested.................................

unless most of those getting tested have already been jabbed which just goes to show how mentally messed up they are.
Click to expand...
Spot on.

They are messed up in the head. I truly don't know how these people get out of bed

A mate here had a runny nose (it was like 6 degrees this morning, how many people get runny noses in winter ffs) when he rocked up to work and his boss wouldn't let him in. Has to go get tested to come back to work. Mental illness. No other way to describe it
 
owen87 said:
I mean the claims you're saying they were censoring.

If you want to get angry about Facebook or Twitter censoring what people can post, then get angry about all the morons who posted absolutely made up drivel like Pete Evans that forced Governments to lean on those private platforms to implement censorship.
Click to expand...
Who knew these governments have no discretion? Like lockdowns, they're forced into doing things they don't want to. :rolleyes:
 
Kurve said:
There's three main tests they can use faik, PCR is one of them and in laymans terms it counts how many times the virus has replicated. How many particles of the virus genetic material is present.

There's a lot of studies been done on the role viral load plays in diganosis and the management of treatment, not as much on covid yet because it's so new.

After an individual is first infected with COVID-19, the virus starts replicating inside cells and then infects more cells. Viral load is a measure of the total number of viral particles inside the individual. The more replications that have occurred, the higher the viral load.

What does a high viral load mean for COVID-19?

“Viral load” and “viral shedding” are popular medical terms lately that have caused many confusions. Some think that a higher viral load makes the infected individual sicker, whilst others think that it makes the individual more infectious. Which one is correct? What is viral load?After an indiv...
www.dralexpolyakov.com.au
.

WHO | Viral load testing

www.who.int www.who.int

www.cuimc.columbia.edu

Viral Load as a Predictor of COVID-19 Patient Outcomes

Viral load, the amount of virus detected in a PCR nasal swab, can be used to predict patient outcomes and guide quarantine decisions, Daniel Griffin says.
www.cuimc.columbia.edu www.cuimc.columbia.edu
Click to expand...

The Conspiracist like BlueE, can’t get their head around the fact that there is no alternative to PCR, for mass screening.
It may have shortcoming but it’s the best we’ve got. Culturing live virus is to expensive and time consuming because it’s is not automated.

There is not such thing as a 100% accurate Lab test - that’s why the term False positive was invented.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

Exe Gesis
Conspiracy Theory Miami Mall 2024
Replies
0
Views
180
Exe Gesis
Exe Gesis
Back
Top