Cotchin v Dangerfield

[Conca Truck]

Who's the better player, Cotchin or Dangerfield?

 

[Kcrack]

Chose Danger. Both players will be elite but Danger's pace, goal kicking and contested work stands more for me than Cotchin.

 

[lamaros]

Cotchin easily. Easily.

 

[Mattrox]

Why split hairs? I have them level at this stage.

I need to watch Cotchin more, but I think Dangerfield has an extra string on his bow but Cotchin's stats.... last time I looked..... indicte he has more efficient delivery. Mind you when Dangerfield is bullocking through packs after the ball he often gives a handball that ends up a clanger.

 

[DG-Man]

Currently same level. Future?

 

[carn tigez]

Why split hairs? I have them level at this stage.

I need to watch Cotchin more, but I think Dangerfield has an extra string on his bow but Cotchin's stats.... last time I looked..... indicte he has more efficient delivery. Mind you when Dangerfield is bullocking through packs after the ball he often gives a handball that ends up a clanger.

Interesting, Cotchin's stats are usually pretty average on their own. Rarely gets more than 30 touches. It's just what he does with the ball is so damn good, and his defensive efforts are some of the best I've seen for an elite midfielder. That kind of stuff doesn't show up in the stats, same as Dangerfield's ability to break the lines.

 

[Engimal]

Dangerfield for me.

 

[OrdinaryJoel]

Pretty even at the moment.

I'd go Dangerfield, due to bias.

However, both have differing traits that result in brilliance, so it's hard to split.

 

[Danger in Texas]

Cotchin on stats, Danger on effect. And boy, do I love effect.

 

[blitzer]

Didn't vote because I rate them about even.

 

[Mattrox]

Interesting, Cotchin's stats are usually pretty average on their own. Rarely gets more than 30 touches. It's just what he does with the ball is so damn good, and his defensive efforts are some of the best I've seen for an elite midfielder. That kind of stuff doesn't show up in the stats, same as Dangerfield's ability to break the lines.

By stats showing Cotchin makes good use of the ball I was talking DE.... getting the ball to a team mate. Certainly looks good when he gets the ball. Classy.

DE is quoted by those who like to troll Crows fans re: Dangerfield. He does kick really well with his left do I don't by that his disposal is crap. I think he picks up an extra clanger per game through his bullocking efforts and sometimes kicks to space for the team mate to run on to the ball.

In 3 years when both hit their prime......

 

[tazhawk]

Would love both at the Hawks.

IMO both about even at this stage.

 

[KissKiss]

I voted Danger but it was really a toss of the coin decision. Both look like they are and will be great players. Would love either at my club

 

[Herne Hill Hammer]

Dunno, too hard, they play in similar positions but have different strengths.

If someome put a gun to my head and said I had to make a choice.

Maybe Dangerfield????????

 

[The full package]

We all love our own players.

 

[NUFC Tiger]

Cotch but I'm biased. Danger would be more than welcome to come to Punt Road if he ever wants a new challenge

 

[OrdinaryJoel]

Cotch but I'm biased. Danger would be more than welcome to come to Punt Road if he ever wants a new challenge

Same applies for Cotch!

 

[ArjenTheGreat]

Dangerfield - exposed form in finals counts.

 

[nicshata]

Dangerfield

 

[The full package]

I love norf supporters

 

[MightyTiger]

Dangerfield - exposed form in finals counts.

2012 EF North v WCE West Coast 24.18 (162) North Melbourne 9.12 (66)

Going by your logic.

 

[Engimal]

Dangerfield for me, comfortably.

 

[Sprout]

Cotchin easily. Easily.

Wouldn't be a proper bigfooty poll without this response on the first page.

"Player X easily. It's not even close."

 

[Sprout]

I chose Danger btw.










It's not even close.

 

[Sanders]

Danger for out n out impact