- Mar 10, 2014
- 10,263
- 11,921
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Man Utd, Celtic, Tanunda
To make our community proud.For what purpose do we need ratkins?
And perhaps speed up our transition to carbon neutrality.
On field - go backwards.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To make our community proud.For what purpose do we need ratkins?
We've done well during trade period for a while but this is well and truly our worst ever if this deal goes through.If Houston = Burgoyne, then Ratkins = Lonie.
Tasmania is looking good. Fancy not capitalising on as much as you can before they come in and accepting rubbish like pieces of shit like Atkins and Lukosiois who's done **** all even under Hardwick. Whilst possibly gifting Collingwood a once in a generation player to win them a flag.This legitimately needs to be incorrect reporting..if we broker THAT deal I think i'll be looking for a new club to support or better still say goodbye to AFL.
I don't blame Dan at all because there's nothing wrong with following the money and he'll get a significant pay increase. My beef is with the club. If they accept this deal after the Rat deal we are the laughing stock of the comp and anything that we have done in the past like the Nick Stevens thing is just a story from the past.Who can blame Dan for leaving.
We're only a little club in Adelaide after all..
Why not go to a big club who demands success and cleans out losers to get there rather than staying at one who's just happy to exist.
This place is a joke. Goodluck getting 70k members again next year
I know, the freak-out over Atkins is pathetic.It’s ****ing working!
I don't blame him at all either.I don't blame Dan at all because there's nothing wrong with following the money and he'll get a significant pay increase. My beef is with the club. If they accept this deal after the Rat deal we are the laughing stock of the comp and anything that we have done in the past like the Nick Stevens thing is just a story from the past.
We stand for nothing ...we make up the numbers and are cucks for the big clubs..burn the place down.
Me too.days like today I’m glad I didn’t renew my membership, if this deal goes through this club is a joke
Now the media have a legitimate reason to blame the list again .Don't stress peeps, we will be fine, we only have to make the 8 and we win apparently, finals is a pass mark, we can't lose.
has the deal been done yet? I'm just saying lets hold fire until the deal is lodged.This doesn't mean you have to accept losing star players on long contracts for unders. Why would we not just hold Houston to his deal?
Ratkins has negative value because he's a poor player on a bad contract. Richards has 0 value. If we're giving up that F1, this is a shockingly bad deal that we simply don't have to do at all.
Port. You are ........... the weakest link.Come in peace , Port have not received fair or equitable compensation here for losing a 2 X AA. Heck , Freo gotta a better deal from the Pies for a solid player in Schultz. We paid overs there , albeit that was with Wright doing the dealing. When it comes to dealing all clubs should feel like they have come out winners.
The media with us are like the English media with the English cricket team.Fox Footy - "While the deal is still far from finalised, Port Adelaide would almost certainly emerge as the big winner from the dealing."
WTF
I can't see anywhere that our F1 is mentioned in this deal. I'm presuming it isn't included.Atkins is fine if the whole point of taking him was for GC to dump salary. The fact our F1 is included in two dumps of Atkins and luko is a joke
It's not.. you should bend over it's coming in hotHanging on the " At least" bit before comment.
It could still be genius.