Trade Requested Daniel Rioli [UFA 2027] - Wants to join Gold Coast

[mrposhman]

Oh, my bad, so pick 13 then

For a better player than was traded for Pick 8. Right.

 

[Ash1337]

Don't the Suns have multiple academy players available to them in 2025. I thought they were ranked quite highly too, so I can't really see them trading out their F1 in order to get 1 of the guys in the draft this year. Is a player like Murphy Reid that important to potentially impact their drafting of players in 2025?

The trade above I'd have no problem with personally. Essentially 13, 20 F1 for 26, 47 and Rioli, but I just see the Suns trading their current year pick more than next years.

Yes but Suns can trade 2 years ahead next season so it's a non-issue. Also I don't remember the limitations to Academy players still applies next season based on ladder position but Suns will likely be top 8 next season and the limitation is 2 bids currently.

 

[Iva Bigun]

He's good but I'm still not trading pick 6 to get him if there is other assets. If there's a chance to keep 6 and get Rioli they'll find a way.

Posted in the Noble thread.
Noble & Rioli to suns with 47 & 48
Tigers get 13, 20, F1 (Suns)
Pies get 26, 29.

My goodness that is an awful trade Suns give up 13, 20 AND a F1 for Rioli, just Bowes + 7 level awful.

 

[Iva Bigun]

I'm thinking it may lower Gold Coast's priority. They're similar players.

Maybe the Suns have realised Richmond are being unrealistic in what they want for Rioli and have moved on to their number 2 target for that position?

 

[Ash1337]

Maybe the Suns have realised Richmond are being unrealistic in what they want for Rioli and have moved on to their number 2 target for that position?

I hope so. Tigers should be retaining Rioli. Not trading him.

 

[MisterMarcus]

He's good but I'm still not trading pick 6 to get him if there is other assets. If there's a chance to keep 6 and get Rioli they'll find a way.

Posted in the Noble thread.
Noble & Rioli to suns with 47 & 48
Tigers get 13, 20, F1 (Suns)
Pies get 26, 29.

Ah the old "We'll sneak a bunch of extra players and picks in there to try to disguise the fact we're reaming another club" trick....

 

[Gavin Excell]

He's good but I'm still not trading pick 6 to get him if there is other assets. If there's a chance to keep 6 and get Rioli they'll find a way.

Posted in the Noble thread.
Noble & Rioli to suns with 47 & 48
Tigers get 13, 20, F1 (Suns)
Pies get 26, 29.

Yuk

 

[Ash1337]

Ah the old "We'll sneak a bunch of extra players and picks in there to try to disguise the fact we're reaming another club" trick....

We'll see where Dogs pick ends up. Could be 11/12 or 15/16/17.

 

[stallon]

He's good but I'm still not trading pick 6 to get him if there is other assets. If there's a chance to keep 6 and get Rioli they'll find a way.

Posted in the Noble thread.
Noble & Rioli to suns with 47 & 48
Tigers get 13, 20, F1 (Suns)
Pies get 26, 29.

Get rid of the F1 to the Tigers, and get rid of pick 26 to the Pies.
Then its reasonable

 

[Daka]

 

[stallon]

I see GC havent learnt anything.

Just GC doing GC things

 

[Dangerousfield]

I see GC havent learnt anything.

Just GC doing GC things

GC are such an easy touch at the trade table. Always swimming in picks, always throwing them away like confetti. They need to grow up and trade like a real football club and not an immature plastic franchise

 

[stallon]

GC are such an easy touch at the trade table. Always swimming in picks, always throwing them away like confetti. They need to grow up and trade like a real football club and not an immature plastic franchise

If what Cal is suggesting gets done, they have to take away all the bonuses from academies that GC get.

Its basically indirect compo picks to whichever club GC decides each year

 

[Daka]

GC are such an easy touch at the trade table. Always swimming in picks, always throwing them away like confetti. They need to grow up and trade like a real football club and not an immature plastic franchise

I mean drafting more young kids other than Academy aren't really going to help them further they already have core group of talented players they drafted got to have a balanced list.

Also it's not often that a senior quality players wants to go to the Suns also, that's the Dimma factor.

 

[stallon]

I remain hopeful that the GC list managers have anything over single digit iq and wont do pick 6 for Rioli

 

[Scotty_222]

If what Cal is suggesting gets done, they have to take away all the bonuses from academies that GC get.

Its basically indirect compo picks to whichever club GC decides each year

Bonuses lol

 

[Obeanie1]

I hope so. Tigers should be retaining Rioli. Not trading him.

Tigers don't want to trade him.

Rioli wants to move.

 

[Coach_Required]

I remain hopeful that the GC list managers have anything over single digit iq and wont do pick 6 for Rioli

Your post is just sheer jealousy. Hope it happens and you can suck on lemons.

 

[Obeanie1]

I see GC havent learnt anything.

Just GC doing GC things

You have seen the future and what they pay?

Wow.

Any chance you can PM me this week's Power Ball numbers?

If Suns are smart they should chase North's Pick 2 and get ahead of the academy bid for Lombard.

 

[Daka]

Tigers don't want to trade him.

Rioli wants to move.

I hate how player agents & players ask the club for more security from the club re-sign for 5 years than want out a couple years later.
I know things can change but it's one of the big issues imo in the AFL.

 

[Dockeroo]

With Lombard tipped to go around 10, what exactly is the point in giving up pick 6??
In normal situations like this, the buying club gets a pick in BEFORE the academy bid is projected. You might see something like 6 used to draft a quality player, then say for example Lombard is bid on at 11, they would use the pick 17 or even some later picks to match him. Send 13 to Richmond for Rioli.
The net result would be:
IN - pick 6, Rioli, Lombard.

Now they will just get Rioli, Lombard and the later R1 picks will be burned up matching Lombard.

Are these people stupid or what?

 

[Iva Bigun]

I see GC havent learnt anything.

Just GC doing GC things

Keep your powder dry, just because Twomey mentioned pick 6 doesn’t mean that’s the deal, on gettable last week he admitted pick 6 was overs

 

[stallon]

With Lombard tipped to go around 10, what exactly is the point in giving up pick 6??
In normal situations like this, the buying club gets a pick in BEFORE the academy bid is projected. You might see something like 6 used to draft a quality player, then say for example Lombard is bid on at 11, they would use the pick 17 or even some later picks to match him. Send 13 to Richmond for Rioli.
The net result would be:
IN - pick 6, Rioli, Lombard.

Now they will just get Rioli, Lombard and the later R1 picks will be burned up matching Lombard.

Are these people stupid or what?

Lombard could easily be bid on before 6, with the draft being so even in that area

I hope west coast bids on him at 3 tbh

 

[bc27]

Will likely win Richmond’s BnF this year too.

 

[captain cotch 9]

I see GC havent learnt anything.

Just GC doing GC things

They cant keep trying to build through the draft.
When did they come into the AFL?
This year was their best year W/L wise...
Something needs to change.

When a good player nominates them its in their best interest to make it work.