Whole thing smells of big office involvement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing to worry about here. Parker is coming!
Now getting back to Rioli. Pick 6 is an absolute joke!
Don’t suns want a F1 tho?Trying to kill 3 birds with 1 stone here...
Richmond (or at least, some of it's fans) wants more than 6
GC will probably want to move pick 13 to avoid it being swallowed up in a Lombard bid.
Richmond fans are suggesting trading up a bunch of their late picks for another 1st in a points swap (Brisbane's has been mentioned).
So Richmond gets 6 & 13
GC gets Rioli, 31,41, & 49 (which add up to being slightly higher value than 13...after a few more picks are added for various reasons, maybe throw in 52 and/or 57 too)
Richmond gets 'more than 6' for Rioli, by trading up it's late picks for a better pick than Brisbane's.
Suns get Rioli and swap 13 for points.
If somehow pick 13 ends up in the mix, firstly I will be shocked, but I reckon we give better picks back than 30's and 40'sTrying to kill 3 birds with 1 stone here...
Richmond (or at least, some of it's fans) wants more than 6
GC will probably want to move pick 13 to avoid it being swallowed up in a Lombard bid.
Richmond fans are suggesting trading up a bunch of their late picks for another 1st in a points swap (Brisbane's has been mentioned).
So Richmond gets 6 & 13
GC gets Rioli, 31,41, & 49 (which add up to being slightly higher value than 13...after a few more picks are added for various reasons, maybe throw in 52 and/or 57 too)
Richmond gets 'more than 6' for Rioli, by trading up it's late picks for a better pick than Brisbane's.
Suns get Rioli and swap 13 for points.
If somehow pick 13 ends up in the mix, firstly I will be shocked, but I reckon we give better picks back than 30's and 40's
6 is already too much for Rioli.
It's insane there's some suggestion of adding more.
We don't need picks this year though? We already have the picks for lombard this year. We need picks for next year's draft. Which is why we will most likely use pick 13 for a future 1st next year. I'd much rather a future first next year then a bunch of junk picks for this yearAm I really adding more?
I'd just be letting Richmond claim a win from being involved in something we're likely to do anyway.
and of course, the real question with the deal is how much salary Richmond will be paying....and if letting them claim a win means we score another 50k/year (on top of what they were already offering), I'll go with that.
I am pretty sure we got enough point this year for Lombard. F1 involved for 13 is way more attractive. Part of Noble deal I suspect.Trying to kill 3 birds with 1 stone here...
Richmond (or at least, some of it's fans) wants more than 6
GC will probably want to move pick 13 to avoid it being swallowed up in a Lombard bid.
Richmond fans are suggesting trading up a bunch of their late picks for another 1st in a points swap (Brisbane's has been mentioned).
So Richmond gets 6 & 13
GC gets Rioli, 31,41, & 49 (which add up to being slightly higher value than 13...after a few more picks are added for various reasons, maybe throw in 52 and/or 57 too)
Richmond gets 'more than 6' for Rioli, by trading up it's late picks for a better pick than Brisbane's.
Suns get Rioli and swap 13 for points.
Am I really adding more?
I'd just be letting Richmond claim a win from being involved in something we're likely to do anyway.
and of course, the real question with the deal is how much salary Richmond will be paying....and if letting them claim a win means we score another 50k/year (on top of what they were already offering), I'll go with that.
6 is about right for a contracted elite half-back in he's prime, if he was out of contract than 12 would be more than fair.6 is already too much for Rioli.
It's insane there's some suggestion of adding more.
Am I really adding more?
I'd just be letting Richmond claim a win from being involved in something we're likely to do anyway.
and of course, the real question with the deal is how much salary Richmond will be paying....and if letting them claim a win means we score another 50k/year (on top of what they were already offering), I'll go with that.
We don't need picks this year though? We already have the picks for lombard this year. We need picks for next year's draft. Which is why we will most likely use pick 13 for a future 1st next year. I'd much rather a future first next year then a bunch of junk picks for this year
I am pretty sure we got enough point this year for Lombard. F1 involved for 13 is way more attractive. Part of Noble deal I suspect.
Pick 13 should bring significant overs for Suns with now upto 8 teams interested.
As for Rioli I suspect pick 6 is basically the deal with some possible minor deals around.
If he goes earlier then expected I assume other deals will be involved in later picks to get more points. But pick 13 has so much value and so many clubs are chasing it. We expect a future 1st will be involved in it at least and nothing lessDon’t think you have enough for Lombard… Assume a bid comes around pick 5-10.
6 is for Rioli, 13 for future 1st, Noble needs to be traded so maybe 23 or 29+something else.
Best case you have 23,41,49 and that’s before more dilution with FA. That’s equivalent to pick 9
Lombard will be 10+ most probably.Don’t think you have enough for Lombard… Assume a bid comes around pick 5-10.
6 is for Rioli, 13 for future 1st, Noble needs to be traded so maybe 23 or 29+something else.
Best case you have 23,41,49 and that’s before more dilution with FA. That’s equivalent to pick 9
Rioli is very good but I'd hardly be calling him elite.6 is about right for a contracted elite half-back in he's prime, if he was out of contract than 12 would be more than fair.
Oh cause AA means the world doesn't it...Rioli is very good but I'd hardly be calling him elite.
Didn't even make the AA squad.
Hope we use pick 6 to bid on him thenLombard will be 10+ most probably.
Noble + F1 for pick 13 likely.
Let's see.
I don't know. I like Rioli offensively but calling him elite? Not for me. Defensively very average. He even struggled to keep up with Flanders in last round.Oh cause AA means the world doesn't it...
He could have easily been AA the last two seasons.
He is around the mark, I don't rate AA at all in fact people say in the media B&F mean more.
I'm not saying AA does mean the world.Oh cause AA means the world doesn't it...
He could have easily been AA the last two seasons.
He is around the mark, I don't rate AA at all in fact people say in the media B&F mean more.
Those stats don't scream "elite" for me.
About the only thing in this crazy world you can be sure of is Richmond not bidding on Lombard if they get pick 6.Hope we use pick 6 to bid on him then