Scandal Dayne Zorko - Instagram

Remove this Banner Ad

I find this all rather fanciful.

If a man (or woman) went to the police and said: "I banged someone behind my partner's back, they found out, logged into my phone and posted a picture of me passed out on the couch with some shitty text on instagram" I'd really hope the copper would tell them to **** off and stop wasting everyone's time.
IMO, it's ignorance and attitudes like yours that contributes to the unacceptably high suicide rates in men.
 
If it results in a loss of income , then I wouldn’t blame him for taking legal measures . I doubt he will do so anyway , but there’s a right and wrong way to handle an incident like this.

Using social media which can affect his career wouldn’t be the smartest way to go about it personally.

I don't know whether he'd be successful.
He has to be able to prove it relates to loss of income.

If i was being sued ,i'd argue that his lifestyle in general was responsible for the loss of income.

If the HUN finds out that player X is snorting coke every weekend , and running a prostitution ring, so he gets sacked by his team when they read the paper...does he really have a case against the HUN for making it public?
 
I don't know whether he'd be successful.
He has to be able to prove it relates to loss of income.

If i was being sued ,i'd argue that his lifestyle in general was responsible for the loss of income.

If the HUN finds out that player X is snorting coke every weekend , and running a prostitution ring, so he gets sacked by his team when they read the paper...does he really have a case against the HUN for making it public?
Agree

But it’s his right to take it up legally if it results in any financial repruccussion.

We don’t know the full story and reading her wall of text does indicates that they may have been separated at the time.

I just find it distasteful that it has been aired so publically when there is a child involved.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Spot on Dirty Bird!


Below is my opinion, if Zorko's ex was responsible for the post.

If Zorko is well advised, he needs to make a complaint, in person, at a Police Station & ask for a Domestic Violence Order be applied for to protect himself and their child. QP should then apply for a DV order on his behalf. The Queensland Domestic & Family Violence Act demands she be charged with the relevant criminal offence, so QP should charge her. If Zorko took the above advice, this is how I believe it would play out. The Police would tell him he probably deserved it & he can apply for a DV Order himself. In relation to criminal charges against his ex, the Police would say "It's not in the Public Interest". If he protested to Police, he would be given the directive to "Leave the Station". edit** Imo Zorko would need to take a well respected Solicitor with him to have a chance of being protected by the relevant legislation & being taken seriously by Police.**
If Zorko's ex gets in first & attends a Police Station, she could say "He's calling me and harassing me" "I don't feel safe". Police would be very sympathetic towards her, take a Statement, apply for a DV Order most likely with the child as a Named Person.


Again my opinion, if the roles were reversed.

Zorko's ex would rightfully make a complaint to the Police & QP would rightfully apply for an order on Zorko's ex's behalf (& get one in Court). QP would rightfully charge Zorko with a Criminal offence under the relevant legislation.
Wowee, she really did a number on you, huh?
 
If you read the Queensland Domestic & Family Violence Act you will discover your opinion is not based on the law.However, as it appears you are taking a dismissive stance on men being targeted with Domestic Violence by women, it ought be comforting to you that imo Police routinely take a similarly dismissive position towards men who seek protection from women under the legislation.

Of course domestic violence in all its forms is abhorrent and should not be dismissed.

But can you point out where in the legislation domestic violence is defined as “Using a carrier service to broadcast just claims of your spouse’s infidelity” ?
 
LOL! WTF does height have anything to do with how someone feels for someone else?

Naturally, you're right of course. No short man in the entire history of men has ever married, let alone dated, a woman.
Forfty percent of people know this.

You're being naive if you think it doesn't make a difference. Generally speaking most women won't even give a man a chance if he's shorter than them whether they admit it or not, unless he's famous/cashed up. His options are limited to women under 5ft 6" of whatever he is. Being a footballer/semi-famous with $$$ negates his shortness somewhat and all of a sudden never wearing heels again isn't as problematic for them.
 
I don't know whether he'd be successful.
He has to be able to prove it relates to loss of income.

If i was being sued ,i'd argue that his lifestyle in general was responsible for the loss of income.

If the HUN finds out that player X is snorting coke every weekend , and running a prostitution ring, so he gets sacked by his team when they read the paper...does he really have a case against the HUN for making it public?
Truth is a defence in defamation actions in most states.
 
Almost - The Queensland Domestic & Family Violence Act makes it very clear. If the act of domestic violence is also a criminal offence then criminal charges need to be pursued. For example: In the bad old days, a bloke gives his wife a shove & her shoulder is hurt, this bloke (in the bad old days) would usually only have a Protection Order made against him. This is not an acceptable outcome. The legislation makes it clear that the bloke in this case needs to face criminal charges also. Those charges would not be heard in the Specialist DV Court (presided over by Magistrates) rather it would be a matter for criminal prosecution in the "normal" Magistrates Court.

Your comment on the role reversal aspect is unclear. edit** Maybe you need to re-read what I have written on the reversal of roles?**
that would be assault or battery and criminal charges would be laid under the criminal code. but yes if physical violence is used you can get a civil order as well. the dv act is not criminal in its jurisdiction, it makes civil orders and breaches are criminal acts

all that reversal stuff was cheating cannot be construed as abuse, it is not directed at the individual
 
It's a bit of a shit situation. Zorko's done a shit of a thing to someone he supposedly loved and only just married. He's going to have to deal with this long after the media circus.

I find it more disturbing that half of the Brissy supporters are trying to turn it around to blame the missus. The way some people blindly support celebs/footy players like they are gods that can do no wrong is sick.
 
You're being naive if you think it doesn't make a difference. Generally speaking most women won't even give a man a chance if he's shorter than them whether they admit it or not, unless he's famous/cashed up. His options are limited to women under 5ft 6" of whatever he is. Being a footballer/semi-famous with $$$ negates his shortness somewhat and all of a sudden never wearing heels again isn't as problematic for them.
I get it though, I'm 5'3. Women out there want what they want.
I wouldn't let it worry you though. Women can pick up on things like insecurities.

Confidence is key.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

can someone explain this to me...

so dane beams has a wife and young child

dane beams cheats on her with his mates sister?

how does this relate to zorko and his sister?
This has nothing to do with Dayne BEAMS, it's all about DAYNE ZORKO. Zorko has a girlfriend who he has a son with, and he cheated on her with his sisters friend.
 
This has nothing to do with Dayne BEAMS, it's all about DAYNE ZORKO. Zorko has a girlfriend who he has a son with, and he cheated on her with his sisters friend.

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh now it makes sense!
 
I get it though, I'm 5'3. Women out there want what they want.
I wouldn't let it worry you though. Women can pick up on things like insecurities.

Confidence is key.

It doesn't, I'm 6'2 and have never had to deal with being knocked back (for those reasons at least) but I do remember a short mate who was cool guy and good looking rooster too getting shot down quite a bit when he tried to pick up chicks that were taller than him. He ended up marrying a super hot 5'1 Italian spinner so it all turned out well for him.
 
You're being naive if you think it doesn't make a difference. Generally speaking most women won't even give a man a chance if he's shorter than them whether they admit it or not, unless he's famous/cashed up. His options are limited to women under 5ft 6" of whatever he is. Being a footballer/semi-famous with $$$ negates his shortness somewhat and all of a sudden never wearing heels again isn't as problematic for them.
I'm almost 190cm and played in bands most of my adult life and it did **** all to help me.
 
Just out of curiosity, exactly how boring do you need to be before you give even half a **** about a person of interests' instagram account?

Edit: just kidding :p

He deserves everything.

Why? It has been stated they were breaking up. They were done. So why exactly does he deserve a life time of unhappiness? And by the look of it, she seems a bit unhinged too tbh. She could be a crazy bitch for all we know. We've all been there. Some of the white knights on here need to get a life.

This has nothing to do with Dayne BEAMS, it's all about DAYNE ZORKO. Zorko has a girlfriend who he has a son with, and he cheated on her with his sisters friend.

They were broken up. I'd suggest you don't believe everything you read.
 
Last edited:
If they were broken up as she posted this, then I imagine her anger has come from evidence that his cheating (because she did state he cheated on her) was during the time they were together. I assume this knowledge was from the date of those text messages she discovered.
 

Scandal Dayne Zorko - Instagram

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top