Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * Coroners Inquiry CANCELLED!

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

Please type names out in full for those who are not covered by suppression orders.

For those covered by suppression orders, please use the following to indicate:

FM - Foster Mother
FF - Foster Father
FGM - Foster Grandmother
FD - Foster Daughter
FPs - Foster Parents

Up to you if you wish to refer to them as former fosters but please write it in full, strictly using the above. No deviations.

Other initials posters will use informally but should not are:


BCR - Batar Creek Road
FA - Frank Abbott
MW - Michelle White
SFR - Strike Force Rosann
AMS - Anne Maree Sharpley
CCR - Cobb and Co Road
GO - Geoff Owens
One even reduced bike riding to - BR :rolleyes:
COG - Consciousness of guilt. Like WHO KNEW?
 
Last edited:
Pleased the Inquest has been cancelled.

Court's time should not be be wasted on "poor historians" that cannot recall the truth.

Seems there is no evidence whatsoever, let alone "new evidence" therefore, we are no closer to finding WT than we were at the very start.

And that would be 9.37am?
I think they should start again with a DIFFERENT team.
I don't know why Jubelins handover didn't happen.
Why????
Something there they wanted hidden????
 
There was a bombshell post earlier today on one of the more authentic and reputable sites (after BF of course!) It was quickly and appropriately deleted by the moderators, but not before it was read by many. The poster claimed FM had previously hurt a child in her care. That child was the poster's own son.

I won't quote any of it. This is interesting because the topic has popped up now and then here that FM had previously hurt another child in her care. This poster appeared to be very authentic and her information has been duly passed to LE, if it wasn't already.

IMO.

On SM-A356E using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Last edited:
There was a bombshell post earlier today on one of the more authentic and reputable sites (after BF of course!) It was quickly and appropriately deleted by the moderators, but not before it was read by many. The poster claimed FM had previously hurt a child in her care. That child was her own son.

I won't quote any of it. This is interesting because the topic has popped up now and then here that FM had previously hurt another child in her care. This poster appeared to be very authentic and her information has been duly passed to LE, if it wasn't already.

IMO.

On SM-A356E using BigFooty.com mobile app
That would not surprise me. I’ve heard and read that before a few times.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

FM has a biological son?

It was said to be someone else's son who was being cared for by FM temporarily.

I first saw this allegation about four years ago. Then it was deleted.
 
If it's true, why wasn't it brought up at the inquest?

It might not be true, it's suppressed or as no charges were laid, irrelevant to the Coroner's inquiry.

I don't think we heard WTs biological mother complain at the Coroner's inquiry that William wasn't developing as he should have been, he had bruising, wasn't dressed suitably and was underweight either when she had her access visits.

Yet we heard her say those things through the media.
 
Pleased the Inquest has been cancelled.

Court's time should not be be wasted on "poor historians" that cannot recall the truth.

Seems there is no evidence whatsoever, let alone "new evidence" therefore, we are no closer to finding WT than we were at the very start.
There might be no evidence because the coroner has declined to hear certain people give evidence?
We don't know what the remaining witnesses might have said.
We only have the coroner's word that the evidence was opinion and not fact based.
This is far from being transparent or impartial.
We are paying the coroner to do a job. IMO that job involves hearing ALL the evidence, not just what she feels like listening to. She doesn't have to accept it as fact, but questions should still be asked and answered. What happened to 'leave no stone unturned '?
 
Well you better go tell white king and every other company that makes bleach sprays .. why argue with something as small as this .. I’ve cleaned for over 30 years , what would I know about bleach spray ???
Wow, well there you go. I can't believe they sell it in a spray bottle. They'll be holding up service stations with it!! Such a dangerous chemical to put in a spray

1733819570535.png
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Wow, well there you go. I can't believe they sell it in a spray bottle. They'll be holding up service stations with it!! Such a dangerous chemical to put in a spray

View attachment 2185328
Sorry I sounded so cranky but the minute I looked at the pic I thought of this product as it’s something I use and yes I could be wrong or it could be out there for any reason but I guess on a true crime forum things should not be dismissed so easily because anything is possible 🙂
 
Maybe one shouldn’t be so quick to knock the Coroner who has been the Coroner on William’s case for the past 5 years.
I think we all need to be mindful and respectful, lest we be held in contempt.

This is a very serious legal process and I think it’s best to be circumspect until Her Honour’s findings are handed down.

What we may not realise is that Her Honour is still taking written submissions, so that’s still occurring at the moment.

IMO
 
There might be no evidence because the coroner has declined to hear certain people give evidence?
We don't know what the remaining witnesses might have said.
We only have the coroner's word that the evidence was opinion and not fact based.
This is far from being transparent or impartial.
We are paying the coroner to do a job. IMO that job involves hearing ALL the evidence, not just what she feels like listening to. She doesn't have to accept it as fact, but questions should still be asked and answered. What happened to 'leave no stone unturned '?
I believe they left at least the most part of the inquest for requests made. I don’t think further grilling from FM was going to make her confess if she’s guilty and I think the coroner knows that foxes can remove a human body so she probably didn’t need to hear further from an expert.
I believe Abbott wanted to say something. Unless he was going to confess, I think the coroner would have what she needs in regards to him.
I don’t think the Coroner just listens to what she wants to but wants the facts which she has compiled over several inquests in the past 5 years.
 
Pleased the Inquest has been cancelled.

Court's time should not be be wasted on "poor historians" that cannot recall the truth.

Seems there is no evidence whatsoever, let alone "new evidence" therefore, we are no closer to finding WT than we were at the very start.
Is that your opinion?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top