Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 3 * Coroner's Hearings Concluded

[Kurve]

Continued from PART 2

Criminal charges:

• Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
• 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
• 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
• Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
• Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty

TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

Please type names out in full for those who are not covered by suppression orders.

For those covered by suppression orders, please use the following to indicate:

FM - Foster Mother
FF - Foster Father
FGM - Foster Grandmother
FD - Foster Daughter
FPs - Foster Parents

Up to you if you wish to refer to them as former fosters but please write it in full, strictly using the above. No deviations.

Other initials posters will use informally but should not are:

BCR - Batar Creek Road
FA - Frank Abbott
MW - Michelle White
SFR - Strike Force Rosann
AMS - Anne Maree Sharpley
CCR - Cobb and Co Road
GO - Geoff Owens
One even reduced bike riding to - BR
COG - Consciousness of guilt. Like WHO KNEW?

 

[passball]

So following on from ARB's posts about seeing things in the windows, I thought I'd give it a go myself. Using my editing program to tweak the highlights, shadows and midtones, etc, I have come up with this image.

Initially, I though the image on the left was a white dog. But now, I realise that it is probably a Polar Bear (see it's white fur, black nose and eyes). The middle image is definitely a Koala, absolutely no doubt. you can see it's two ears, little eyes and his hands crossed in front of him as he squats in the window. Then we have the image on the right. It is clearly a little animal with a narrow face, big black eyes and short nose with black nostrils. It is either a racoon or a possum. In between the racoon/possom and Koala (which is hard to see in this picture) is a male lion peeking out from behind the racoon/possum.

In front of the Polar Bear is a box which looks like a picnic basket. So I conclude that these are not real animals but are stuffed animals and this is a Teddy Bear's Picnic.



View attachment 2261069

SMH. What is happening with people lately? Getting Night at the Museum vibes where the animals and flowering plants come to life and dance under the light filled decorated trees.

There was a picnic basket on the ground on the other side of the kitchen bench. That's about my input.

 

[Angry Red Bull]

I won't go into great detail. Too much else to do..I will make the following comments. There are 5 effects which impact images either from a distance or as reflections.

Pixelation
Glass fibre striations
Darkness and light
Interference from other reflections
Objects interceding

Each creates interference to image of differing nature. The best way to mitigate these is to look at the image without magnification. If the image at that point has human form with noticeable detail it is because it is human. Too much pixelation creates what I refer to as pixelation ghouls. They are strange objects caused by the excessive magnification. When you start to get them, you pull back magnification.. They are easy enough to identify and simply ignore. The glass fibre striations are small usually red or black thin lines which are there but don't damage the image . You ignore them.

Darkness is most problematic because when you change light you will still not get definition..the best you can get is frosty shape which shape is recognisable as human form but with disadvantage of total lack of detail. Caution needed to avoid accepting these. Often times these images are accompanied by lights from camera flash discharge. These effects have only two forms. Where the light is poor the effect will be a white rectangle in shape of a phone.. when light is good it will instead be something held (a phone or camera but not clear ) accompanied by white balls of light either side.....which are artifacts from the flash discharge itself

Interceding objects there are two relating to the two mens across on the high balcony. At midriff is a black solid object diagonally across. That is the high balcony aluminium border between fly screens which are visible on the high balcony. Also there is a somewhat strange interference resembling flowers. This is the sheer curtain pattern also visible from the high balcony view.. you can discern hair ( or bald) arms, body and shape and colour of clothes. Beard..You see general shape of facial features but not the detail.

 

[31550]

I won't go into great detail. Too much else to do..I will make the following comments. There are 5 effects which impact images either from a distance or as reflections.

Pixelation
Glass fibre striations
Darkness and light
Interference from other reflections
Objects interceding

Each creates interference to image of differing nature. The best way to mitigate these is to look at the image without magnification. If the image at that point has human form with noticeable detail it is because it is human. Too much pixelation creates what I refer to as pixelation ghouls. They are strange objects caused by the excessive magnification. When you start to get them, you pull back magnification.. They are easy enough to identify and simply ignore. The glass fibre striations are small usually red or black thin lines which are there but don't damage the image . You ignore them.

Darkness is most problematic because when you change light you will still not get definition..the best you can get is frosty shape which shape is recognisable as human form but with disadvantage of total lack of detail. Caution needed to avoid accepting these. Often times these images are accompanied by lights from camera flash discharge. These effects have only two forms. Where the light is poor the effect will be a white rectangle in shape of a phone.. when light is good it will instead be something held (a phone or camera but not clear ) accompanied by white balls of light either side.....which are artifacts from the flash discharge itself

Interceding objects there are two relating to the two mens across on the high balcony. At midriff is a black solid object diagonally across. That is the high balcony aluminium border between fly screens which are visible on the high balcony. Also there is a somewhat strange interference resembling flowers. This is the sheer curtain pattern also visible from the high balcony view.. you can discern hair ( or bald) arms, body and shape and colour of clothes. Beard..You see general shape of facial features but not the detail.

TLDR - Dunning-Krueger effect.

Dunning–Kruger effect - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Angry Red Bull]

TLDR - Dunning-Krueger effect.

Dunning–Kruger effect - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I have confirmed IQ of 142 which places me in top 1% intellect. I consider my strongest attributes analytical ability that's why I prepared experts reports to court on forensic accounting matters and were always accepted. So thanks but no

 

[31550]

I have confirmed IQ of 142 which places me in top 1% intellect. I consider my strongest attributes analytical ability that's why I prepared experts reports to court on forensic accounting matters and were always accepted. So thanks but no

Bit of an 'own goal' right there.

 

[Angry Red Bull]

Bit of an 'own goal' right there.

Think what you want. I'm very easily able to navigate the effects of which I speak and determine truth. And have.

Ive posted the evidence here that is DEFINITIVE in determining that a photo substituion happened. Still you fail to grasp it. I'll therefore post a series of about 10-11 photographs which are irrefutable to my finding.....beyond reasonable doubt.

A tree causing the cluttering in the sliding door was cut down before the 12th.. that can only exist if the images were substituted.

Ive provided the shortened series in PM for one poster. Will do for the other 5 too.

 

[31550]

Think what you want. I'm very easily able to navigate the effects of which I speak and determine truth. And have.

Ive posted the evidence here that is DEFINITIVE in determining that a photo substituion happened. Still you fail to grasp it. I'll therefore post a series of about 10-11 photographs which are irrefutable to my finding.....beyond reasonable doubt.

A tree causing the cluttering in the sliding door was cut down before the 12th.. that can only exist if the images were substituted.

Ive provided the shortened series in PM for one poster. Will do for the other 5 too.

 

[Underarrest_]

Would be good to know for sure the whole timeline of events at the house that morning. What time who was where. What time FF left the house, the timeline of what happened when that morning.
Unfortunately we might never know.

 

[Angry Red Bull]

TCP was 100% right .the only mistake he made was he thought he must have went missing after McD instead of next morning. Everything else spot on as it turns out.

Take my hat off to you TCP

 

[Angry Red Bull]

Would be good to know for sure the whole timeline of events at the house that morning. What time who was where. What time FF left the house, the timeline of what happened when that morning.
Unfortunately we might never know.

The best you can have around that aspect is a hypothesis. You can refine the hypothesis in ways but it will always remain a hypothesis in afraid

 

[31550]

Would be good to know for sure the whole timeline of events at the house that morning. What time who was where. What time FF left the house, the timeline of what happened when that morning.
Unfortunately we might never know.

Agree the timeline is key. Staggering that after 10 years SFR still don't seem to have an 'official' timeline or at least a shared understanding of the sequence of events.

 

[Angry Red Bull]

Opinion and conjecture

Symmetry between photos

The first 3 photos have FD, WT and FGM all wearing the same clothes..the play items are all in much the same place. These three have same attributes showing they come from same photo set same date..The third one is the one which exhibited the full tree which I can prove was substituted from earlier time. The 3rd also has the two men on high balcony.

The 4th has image of FGM shoes....the same..the articles of play all there but different places marginally. Sane photo array I feel. It has two reflections comprising FM, a child kneeling and an adult taking pictures off the verandah. Same photo array

The 5th doesn't capture FGM but only because of angle. The play items remain identical to the 4th. The suit is a different suit to the others. The stronger black lines. The pattern of the 4th has been edited in an attempt to cover pattern error in comparison thereby creating blurs at strategic points indicative of these edits. At one point the red of the cloth has been edited to beyond the collar. Fatal error. There is a stitch line on the 4th that appears to be on skin at his neck.. I simply don't understand what has been done there. Is it another shirt or just an edit of some form for unknown reason? The 5th has two people in reflections one an adult and the other a child both standing to immediate left of FM as she takes the roar shot.. WT is looking up to them

The third has a major discolouration on his right neck jaw line near the ear...it appears less conspicuous in another of those first 3 too but is there.

I'm unclear of what has happened to the 5th suit WT and why. It appears that W has been cloned with newer version of suit and shows clear view of his neck.. there is very slight discolouration low and to right side of neck, hardly discernible..

My best guess is that a stitch line has been included at his neck front on to hide his neck in the 4th. In the 5th because it has been cloned there was no need to make edits..instead they corrected for obvious pattern errors consistency by blurring the relevant parts of the 4th

The most likely reason I surmise is that they used the 5th with older version of W and no neck issues newer suit so that there was little scrutiny of the 3rd photo neck mark or whatever caused the neckline edits to the 4th.. they created the iconic image to promote the cause. An anomaly is created though. He is looking up to the people. How can that have been replicated in a clone? You would have to have an identical pose.

I'll keep persevering with the 4th to 5th progression anomalies until I find the answer. At present I'm not comfortable with the status

Both the 4th and 5th have two objects on that back brick wall which I suspect was removed by edit..they are 15 seconds apart. Therefore possible...One possibly the FF. The other smaller perhaps a child. It is definitely the location of edits. I'll try and create outline of what I see

 

[Angry Red Bull]

Opinion only
This probably needs a little explanation. Maybe it's a koala or a dog? Nah has to be shadow surely? Slight discolouration of skin when magnified but was noticeable absent magnification. Interesting that the right hand appears discoloured in both too..Hang on so too left.. and ankle. Damn the DKE makes it look swollen

Or the Dunning Kruger effect misplaced beliefs? That trips you up every time

But it's alright. It's come good in photos 4 and 5.. Phew..just distorted images

Hang on..it's back again in the photo 2 I think..Same place too around ankle and right neck. You just can't rely on those photographers to get it right can you..keep making same mistakes

It almost appears that 4 and 5 don't match 1 to 3..but I can't work out 4 at all.....has stitches on his skin!!! Around his neck WTF?

But what would I know I'm suffering Dunning Kruger effect

Importantly he's good in 5 the one they choose to promote. Must have been an ordeal finding that one

 

[31550]

 

[winyhill]

I have confirmed IQ of 142 which places me in top 1% intellect. I consider my strongest attributes analytical ability that's why I prepared experts reports to court on forensic accounting matters and were always accepted. So thanks but no

I look forward to the update from SFR on the case once they have been advised of your evidence. An arrest should be imminent.
You have shared this with Police, haven't you? I hope they are taking this seriously. They do get a lot of crackpot theories so it may take them some time to review your evidence.

 

[Angry Red Bull]

I look forward to the update from SFR on the case once they have been advised of your evidence. An arrest should be imminent.
You have shared this with Police, haven't you? I hope they are taking this seriously. They do get a lot of crackpot theories so it may take them some time to review your evidence.

Lots of ways to skin a cat. I will make sure I'm heard

 

[passball]

Lots of ways to skin a cat. I will make sure I'm heard

Skin a cat or skin a tiger?
Harder to skin a monster.

 

[Angry Red Bull]

There should be consistency between the 5 because they were allegedly taken the same time. There isn't.. that is a hallmark of alleged manipulation and will be one small part of my evidence

 

[Angry Red Bull]

Skin a cat or skin a tiger?
Harder to skin a monster.

Opinion and conjecture

I don't view it as a monster. I adopt a methodology that creates mutually exclusive decision trees if I can. You can here because it is a set day and set number of photos portraying a state at a moment in time..if it's inconsistent within it's terms or to reality it is fake. If it's false then you can conclude why very easily and becomes evidence.

Are photos 2 & 3 wrong?. No because they are consistent. Yet they as a group are inconsistent with the remainder. You can conclude why

In essence you try to prove an intentional lie with manipulation... By so doing you can prove consciousness of guilt..if the subject matter of the COG is so substantive you then prove criminal conduct.

Once you have that assuming you do you then look at propensity evidence to aid WHAT..I have...Propensity evidence isn't a mutually exclusive decision tree event. But at that point it doesn't matter. if COG is proven regarding a substantive issue like the correctness of the photos and timestamps then you won't need more..

 

[Angry Red Bull]

Ive developed and solved now 9.mutually exclusive decision trees. By the time I'm finished I hope to have dozens. They are all working out in favour of one solution.

I chose the photo analysis this time because it is both a mutually exclusive decision tree but also aids propensity evidence. Double whammy

 

[Awakening]

After my hissy fit about bickering, I took a break (I’m currently up to page 81).

What bought me back?

Well I received the Aldi brochure in my inbox and as I’m flicking through, I stop at this page.

And in the words of the great Ozzy Osbourne “I love you guys but you’re f@@$ing nuts!”

If you know, you know

 

[Angry Red Bull]

A good example is whether record was made of the clothes worn by both FD and FGM at the time police arrived..if it's different to what's on the verandah at just after 11 it's persuasive evidence that the photos were substitutes. This will be in my report..I'm told such record was made.

 

[Angry Red Bull]

After my hissy fit about bickering, I took a break (I’m currently up to page 81).

What bought me back?

Well I received the Aldi brochure in my inbox and as I’m flicking through, I stop at this page.

And in the words of the great Ozzy Osbourne “I love you guys but you’re f@@$ing nuts!”

If you know, you know

I need to have thicker skin..I just see no point in trying to pull anyone down trying to solve a case....especially with bullying and ridicule..what point does it serve?

I don't think it was hissy in nature..quite moderate if you want to ask me..

 

[Angry Red Bull]

I'm advised that this is what she was wearing..I can't confirm it. That's not what she was wearing on the verandah.

That's the thing if a substitution occurred then facts which show inconsistency become COG evidence.

 

[Underarrest_]

Lots of ways to skin a cat. I will make sure I'm heard

60 minutes?