D1 Division 1 - 2022

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
DIVISION 1 FINALS 2022
2nd SEMIFINAL
PRELIMINARY FINAL
COBURG CITY OVAL 2pm SAT 3/9
GRAND FINAL
TREVOR BARKER OVAL 2:30pm SAT 10/9
PEGS
KewKewPEGS
1st SEMIFINALvsvs
Glen EiraOld CamberwellOld Camberwell
Old Camberwell

DIVISION 1 RESERVES 2022
2nd SEMIFINAL
PRELIMINARY FINAL
COBURG CITY OVAL 11:40am SAT 3/9
GRAND FINAL
TREVOR BARKER OVAL 11:45am SAT 10/9
Kew
Old CamberwellOld CamberwellKew
1st SEMIFINALvsvs
PEGSPEGSPEGS
Glen Eira
 
Last edited:
Still showing PEGS as 7 and 1. Has this been confirmed? Would be a harsher penalty than just losing the points for the game for deliberately playing an unregistered player surely? I know the lag between PlayHQ and GameDay is a big problem for some clubs putting in a clearance request on a Friday. The VAFA are supposed to duplicate it in PlayHQ for the previous club to sign off but that often doesn’t happen until the Monday, even though clubs were promised it wouldn’t be a problem at the start of the season.
I was told this was certain but maybe there is an appeal in process. I agree the penalty should be harsher. Perhaps loss of more game points.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I am not sure anything dodgy or untoward was done by PEGS. In short from what I understand it looks like they played a player who was registered but apparently the registration system is automatic and the club should have seeked a seperate approval from the Vafa before playing him against Glen Eira. They shouldn’t have taken for granted that the auto approval was ok..who was to know a separate approval was required. I understand PEGS finally got approval for the player to play the rest of the year but they took the points off PEGS for the Glen Eira game, which he had been auto approved for and registered but PEGS hadn’t received approval from the board.
It is what it is and hurts to lose 4 points but not sure you can call what happened dishonest. It’s a costly price to pay losing points for someone that played back pocket and pegs won easily on the day. Going into the game he was registered as per the system. What the club hadn’t done was get separate approval from the board which was apparently required. Gotta accept the umpire’s decision. Nothing was mentioned leading into the game. The auto approval wasn’t questioned..pegs play him and win comfortably away, then the board which has a prominent ex Glen Eira figure..Amazing how the world goes round..

To be clear player had played two games in the country he came back to pegs where he will play rest of season out. Club lodged a request for the player to get approved to play on line. Approval was provided on line. He played. Later club is informed it should have got permission outside the system approved permission for him to play. Pegs won, points have been taken away and given to the team it beat.
 
Last edited:
I am not sure anything dodgy or untoward was done by PEGS. In short from what I understand it looks like they played a player who was registered but apparently the registration system is automatic and the club should have seeked a seperate approval from the Vafa before playing him against Glen Eira. They shouldn’t have taken for granted that the auto approval was ok..who was to know a separate approval was required. I understand PEGS finally got approval for the player to play the rest of the year but they took the points off PEGS for the Glen Eira game, which he had been auto approved for and registered but PEGS hadn’t received approval from the board.
It is what it is and hurts to lose 4 points but not sure you can call what happened dishonest. It’s a costly price to pay losing points for someone that played back pocket and pegs won easily on the day. Going into the game he was registered as per the system. What the club hadn’t done was get separate approval from the board which was apparently required. Gotta accept the umpire’s decision. Nothing was mentioned leading into the game. The auto approval wasn’t questioned..pegs play him and win comfortably away, then the board which as a prominent ex Glen Eira member decide that the player shouldn’t have played and they can lose the points. Amazing how the world goes round..
Is it true the club took the option of losing the points ,or the player suspended
 
I am not sure anything dodgy or untoward was done by PEGS. In short from what I understand it looks like they played a player who was registered but apparently the registration system is automatic and the club should have seeked a seperate approval from the Vafa before playing him against Glen Eira. They shouldn’t have taken for granted that the auto approval was ok..who was to know a separate approval was required. I understand PEGS finally got approval for the player to play the rest of the year but they took the points off PEGS for the Glen Eira game, which he had been auto approved for and registered but PEGS hadn’t received approval from the board.
It is what it is and hurts to lose 4 points but not sure you can call what happened dishonest. It’s a costly price to pay losing points for someone that played back pocket and pegs won easily on the day. Going into the game he was registered as per the system. What the club hadn’t done was get separate approval from the board which was apparently required. Gotta accept the umpire’s decision. Nothing was mentioned leading into the game. The auto approval wasn’t questioned..pegs play him and win comfortably away, then the board which has a prominent ex Glen Eira figure decide that the player shouldn’t have played and they can lose the points. Amazing how the world goes round..
Are you suggesting the ex Geln Eira figure who has been on the board for a couple of weeks has influenced the decision to take 4 points off a club that cheated. Wow sounds like sour grapes and borders on a slanderous comment. Look at what PEGS did before assuming the board was influenced.
 
Are you suggesting the ex Geln Eira figure who has been on the board for a couple of weeks has influenced the decision to take 4 points off a club that cheated. Wow sounds like sour grapes and borders on a slanderous comment. Look at what PEGS did before assuming the board was influenced.
I thought it was a lack of a permit , not sure whether that goes to the board . Nothing to do with the new board member who is a breath of fresh air .
 
View attachment 1413912

Unprecedented round of tipping with everyone getting 5. WTP picked a good week to miss... :)
I was in the air flying to Dublin for work and couldn’t get the wifi to work on the plane! Disaster for some comps but it worked out well for me here, kudos to everyone for their good tipping!

I might check out some venues for the next VAFA junket while I’m here 😂
 
I am not sure anything dodgy or untoward was done by PEGS. In short from what I understand it looks like they played a player who was registered but apparently the registration system is automatic and the club should have seeked a seperate approval from the Vafa before playing him against Glen Eira. They shouldn’t have taken for granted that the auto approval was ok..who was to know a separate approval was required. I understand PEGS finally got approval for the player to play the rest of the year but they took the points off PEGS for the Glen Eira game, which he had been auto approved for and registered but PEGS hadn’t received approval from the board.
It is what it is and hurts to lose 4 points but not sure you can call what happened dishonest. It’s a costly price to pay losing points for someone that played back pocket and pegs won easily on the day. Going into the game he was registered as per the system. What the club hadn’t done was get separate approval from the board which was apparently required. Gotta accept the umpire’s decision. Nothing was mentioned leading into the game. The auto approval wasn’t questioned..pegs play him and win comfortably away, then the board which has a prominent ex Glen Eira figure..Amazing how the world goes round..

To be clear player had played two games in the country he came back to pegs where he will play rest of season out. Club lodged a request for the player to get approved to play on line. Approval was provided on line. He played. Later club is informed it should have got permission outside the system approved permission for him to play. Pegs won, points have been taken away and given to the team it beat.
If the clearance was approved online, surely PEGS are fighting this? The VAFA would have had to have input into the clearance going through PlayHQ and back to GameDay. If they didn’t pick it up before the game, should be play on. Clubs shouldn’t be punished for the sh!t show that is the current registration double system.
There must be more to it for the VAFA to strip points.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Could the player be added to the teamsheet? If yes, then he can play. If no, then he can't (unless given prior approval from the VAFA). Is that too simplistic?
May be more a case of the Integrity Committee hadn’t yet given its approval as he had come from a paying country league. One of our guys couldn’t play against OM’s Rnd 1 for that reason.
 
I am not sure anything dodgy or untoward was done by PEGS. In short from what I understand it looks like they played a player who was registered but apparently the registration system is automatic and the club should have seeked a seperate approval from the Vafa before playing him against Glen Eira. They shouldn’t have taken for granted that the auto approval was ok..who was to know a separate approval was required. I understand PEGS finally got approval for the player to play the rest of the year but they took the points off PEGS for the Glen Eira game, which he had been auto approved for and registered but PEGS hadn’t received approval from the board.
It is what it is and hurts to lose 4 points but not sure you can call what happened dishonest. It’s a costly price to pay losing points for someone that played back pocket and pegs won easily on the day. Going into the game he was registered as per the system. What the club hadn’t done was get separate approval from the board which was apparently required. Gotta accept the umpire’s decision. Nothing was mentioned leading into the game. The auto approval wasn’t questioned..pegs play him and win comfortably away, then the board which has a prominent ex Glen Eira figure..Amazing how the world goes round..

To be clear player had played two games in the country he came back to pegs where he will play rest of season out. Club lodged a request for the player to get approved to play on line. Approval was provided on line. He played. Later club is informed it should have got permission outside the system approved permission for him to play. Pegs won, points have been taken away and given to the team it beat.
Was he the difference in the result? From score line (VAFA have removed), it seems not! A convincing win. Might make my way to 2nd round clash, be very interesting. Supercoach's head must be nearly ready to explode that they have had 4 points awarded on a technicality (he wont admit it though)
 
Was he the difference in the result? From score line (VAFA have removed), it seems not! A convincing win. Might make my way to 2nd round clash, be very interesting. Supercoach's head must be nearly ready to explode that they have had 4 points awarded on a technicality (he wont admit it though)

See that Kew are hosting supercoach this week. Wonder who has a bigger ego out of him and Aitken! From my knowledge of them, Ill go with Aitken as the more acclaimed coach. Kew to win with their turf mud heap!
 
See that Kew are hosting supercoach this week. Wonder who has a bigger ego out of him and Aitken! From my knowledge of them, Ill go with Aitken as the more acclaimed coach. Kew to win with their turf mud heap!
Edgars record where he's been is better and he's a better bloke , but that's not hard against that imbecile who should be banned anyway !
 
Points to GE LADDER showing
I am not sure anything dodgy or untoward was done by PEGS. In short from what I understand it looks like they played a player who was registered but apparently the registration system is automatic and the club should have seeked seperate approval from the Vafa before playing him against Glen Eira. Not assuming the auto approval was ok..who was to know separate approval is required. As it’s not an amateur competition the VAFA rejected him being able to come back and play with PEGS for the rest of the year. I understand PEGS finally got approval for the player to play the rest of the year but they took the points off PEGS for the Glen Eira game, which he had been auto approved for and registered but PEGS hadn’t received approval from the board.
Is what it is and hurts to lose 4 points but not sure you can call what happened dishonest. It’s a costly price to pay losing points for someone that played back pocket and pegs won easily on the day. Going into the game he was registered as per the system. What the club hadn’t done was get separate approval from the board which was apparently required. Gotta accept the umpire’s decision. Nothing was mentioned leading into the game. Or the auto approval questioned..pegs play him. Win comfortably then the board decide nope he shouldn’t have played and they can lose the points. Amazin
Was he the difference in the result? From score line (VAFA have removed), it seems not! A convincing win. Might make my way to 2nd round clash, be very interesting. Supercoach's head must be nearly ready to explode that they have had 4 points awarded on a technicality (he wont admit it though)
Here he goes again. Ranting about the super coach. Nothing to do with what happened hater.
 
See that Kew are hosting supercoach this week. Wonder who has a bigger ego out of him and Aitken! From my knowledge of them, Ill go with Aitken as the more acclaimed coach. Kew to win with their turf mud heap!

Anonymous and continual cracks as a bloke who is making a great contribution to local footy reveals more about yourself than it does J Edgar.

Get a grip, or perhaps loosen it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top