Opinion Do we REALLY want Jack Steven from St. Kilda?

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
You love that people put fake information in wikipedia?

It's not fake, it's just pre-emptive.

Nobody was opposed to this deal if the price was right, and at such a bargain price, this is worth the risk every day of the week.

He'll be our second best mid behind Danger next year - guaranteed.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

It's not fake, it's just pre-emptive.

Nobody was opposed to this deal if the price was right, and at such a bargain price, this is worth the risk every day of the week.

He'll be our second best mid behind Danger next year - guaranteed.

Certainly Steven close to his best could bring that sort of output.

Of course there is some risk he won't get back to consistently playing and performing at a high standard. And that's reflected in the late pick that's currently earmarked for him.

But 57 Brownlow votes in the four seasons before 2019 tells you that he's not that far past some pretty compelling football at the top level.

So, if Jack does return to footy with a spring in his step next year, this deal will be a massive win for us.
 
Last edited:
58 is a steal. I still think 37 will be involved ... 37 + 58 and we get Steven plus a future 3rd or something in the 40's this year if other deals are done.
 
58 is a steal. I still think 37 will be involved ... 37 + 58 and we get Steven plus a future 3rd or something in the 40's this year if other deals are done.

Multiple reporters have said #58 straight swap for Steven.

Hope they're right.
 
Not that fun to watch really. Good player though.
Miers is fun to watch! More of that.
Constable firing out bullet handballs is fun to watch.
And you get to see them grow up.
It's all subjective anyway.

True on all parts, poorly phrased on mine.

I meant more if he helps the team be enjoyable to watch - competitiveness is one thing that helps with that imo. I think we'll get to see plenty of Gryan and Chook next year with or without Jack, no reason for it to be either/or.
 
Like who?
perhaps those that say they are never posting again due to the poor efforts from the club..

Cant have been you however.. you dont make outlandish statments and then dont follow thru.

GO Catters
 
Jack is a good player at best imo...some saints supporters think he is an elite midfielder, not me. He more often than not butchers the ball by foot and handballs generally head towards the feet of the target. Won multiple bf's in a very poor team, think Robbie Flower similar thing, loved by their own but not really warranted.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Jack is a good player at best imo...some saints supporters think he is an elite midfielder, not me. He more often than not butchers the ball by foot and handballs generally head towards the feet of the target. Won multiple bf's in a very poor team, think Robbie Flower similar thing, loved by their own but not really warranted.

Sounds like he'll fit right in then....
 
Smith does not suck. Two top 10s in our best and fairest in the only years he was given a decent amount of games.
I agree in part, thought he and Stanley playing together could have been anything as a ruck duo but the MC decided against it.

IMO didn't take his opportunities when he was the lone ruckman but maybe that was because his confidence had already been shot.
 
Jack is a good player at best imo...some saints supporters think he is an elite midfielder, not me. He more often than not butchers the ball by foot and handballs generally head towards the feet of the target. Won multiple bf's in a very poor team, think Robbie Flower similar thing, loved by their own but not really warranted.

Flower was a champion.
 
Flower was a champion.

If Jack Steven is only as good as Robbie Flower, and we get him for Zac Smith....its beyond belief!!!

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that a St Kilda supporter would downplay Steven's ability as a footballer knowing he is leaving....

we both know Steven is quality IF we get him fit and firing...what a steal this could be...
 
If Jack Steven is only as good as Robbie Flower, and we get him for Zac Smith....its beyond belief!!!

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that a St Kilda support would downplay Steven's ability as a footballer knowing he is leaving....

we both know Steven is quality IF we get him fit and firing...what a steal this could be...

To be honest I'm not overly optimistic this will go well but if we only blow pick 58 then little harm done. And as for Flower, he was an absolute champion.
 
Jack is a good player at best imo...some saints supporters think he is an elite midfielder, not me. He more often than not butchers the ball by foot and handballs generally head towards the feet of the target. Won multiple bf's in a very poor team, think Robbie Flower similar thing, loved by their own but not really warranted.

Do you have some miserable Geelong supporting relatives who post on Bigfooty by any chance?
 
To be honest I'm not overly optimistic this will go well but if we only blow pick 58 then little harm done. And as for Flower, he was an absolute champion.


Exactly.......

What I dont get, is the Saints baulked at 37 for Steven, but now take 58? Have we offered another player (to create a list spot), or have we offered 37 as well...or do the Saints need the cap room to facilitate the multiple trades they've made...????

Any ideas?
 
Exactly.......

What I dont get, is the Saints baulked at 37 for Steven, but now take 58? Have we offered another player (to create a list spot), or have we offered 37 as well...or do the Saints need the cap room to facilitate the multiple trades they've made...????

Any ideas?

Think that may be it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top